.. double oppppsss ..
.. you are justifying, defending and protecting ..
.. you don't get to do that for the next 10 days ..
.. why tell someone they're completely wrong then apologize? Makes no sense ..
.. say what you mean and mean what you say ..
.. fighting and stating your position is entirely acceptable but you cannot tell someone they are wrong because they may, in fact, be correct ..
.. you cannot tell people who they are because you might be wrong ..
.. if you want to respond, state your position. You can choose not to respond to any post. You're in charge, not the other way around ..
.. last, no apologies for what you believe in .. "
Again where did i violate this?
And what is wrong with apologizing? I am not happy that stating my position may hurt someone and ma sorry for that. But unfortunately that may be a consequence of protecting my integrity. I have no problem with apologize for a consequence even if the consequence is necessary
Let's say you have to fire someone for doing a poor job or missing work. But you like the person and you know other factors have contributed to why they have not been able to work up to potential but you still have to let them go. Just because the firing is justified means you can't feel bad about the result such as someone being out of a job?
Empathy is always a good thing HL, even with someone you may be in conflict with