Why Should Jesus Love Me?

Grace Walker wrote:

<quoted text>
Romans 2:14..
So, when "Gentiles", who do NOT have the LAW, instinctively do what the law demands, they are a law to themselves even though they DO NOT have the LAW.
CAN YOU READ SKOM????
anyone who is NOT a Jew..is a Gentile..How are you going to argue this one

Counter_Strike wrote:

The red teddy bear is an appropriate icon, seems to scream rebellion.

LAWEST100 wrote:

<quoted text> That is a joke "doctor", and you constantly display your ignorance. Let me ask you something.......... how much wine or how many beers do you drink randomly or regular, do you play the lottery or numbers, do you frequent strip clubs or bars? It wouldn't surprise me if you do any of the above.

Skombolis wrote:

Simply Put....you are a hypocrite. every post you have made to me has been argumentative and condenscending. And since you kept repeating this verse and saying there is no other way to understand it then of course I have to question how you harmonize the other verses because if we went just by that verse then repenting, being born-again, the Holy Spirit, etc wouldnt matter. So yes there is more than one way to understand that verse. One way would be to see it as part of a whole and simply one requirement needed for salvation. You emphatically stated salvation is not conditional yet I showed you all the verses with "if" which denotes conditional and you still have not addressed them. But I am moving on. you have not given me any reason to think you want an honest discussion since you have made at least 20 negative posts about me and i never even replied to a post of yours until this last one because of that and that is why I wont continue now

Skombolis wrote:

<quoted text>Yes I can read. I also can see. One of the things I see is a pattern. and you use this inflamatory, arrogant tactic regardless of what verse you are discussing. Whether I agree with your interpretation of this verse is irrelevant. What is the problem is you regualarly tell anyone who disagrees with you on any verse that they are blind, are calling God a liar, are a pharisee, are of the devil, dont trust in Christ, dont trust in the sacrifice, dont have faith, etc. You are a cancer to honest, truth-seeking Christians wishing to engage in productive scriptual debate or discussion

LAWEST100 wrote:

<quoted text> That is a joke "doctor", and you constantly display your ignorance. Let me ask you something.......... how much wine or how many beers do you drink randomly or regular, do you play the lottery or numbers, do you frequent strip clubs or bars? It wouldn't surprise me if you do any of the above.

LAWEST100 wrote:

<quoted text> That is a joke "doctor", and you constantly display your ignorance. Let me ask you something.......... how much wine or how many beers do you drink randomly or regular, do you play the lottery or numbers, do you frequent strip clubs or bars? It wouldn't surprise me if you do any of the above.

LAWEST100 wrote:

<quoted text> Exactly, and combining what. I said with what you just said is all in one nutshell pretty much with me.

Skombolis wrote:

<quoted text>And a perfect example in one sentece why this room is often a joke. and from someone who says all of Christ's teachings apply to her until you show her the post she made claiming the opposite. And from a person who sayys the gospels were for the Jews then takes verses from them for why she believes OSAS. it would still be a joke even if she was knowledgable and honest. That she isnt just makes it that much more baffling. But this is how many topix Christians think the proper way to debate scripture is. Sad that

Black Thunder 42 wrote:

<quoted text> There are no free passes in life. Be it a believer or a non believer. Be there a god or no god. Everything one does in one's life is scaled. Either you affect your environment positively or negatively, and that effect is then returned to you as well as spread as effect throughout that entire environment...So it is to everyone's advantage to do one's best to maintain a positive asset to all there is.

simplyput wrote:

<quoted text>
It really irritates you for someone to show you the truth, then you start calling them names. The truth does hurt, skom .
You are wrong, I have always said You MUST BELIEVE in the Lord Jesus Christ---that is the condition! You MUST go through JESUS.
You are a very negative person to even have a good discussion with.
Everything anyone says to you is WRONG and you want PROOF, No one wants to give just their opinion to you because you either can't read their post right or you take it the wrong way. Grow up!

LAWEST100 wrote:

<quoted text> Who is this Christian that is "standing up for righteousness in the sight"..........Doc Reality with all his nasty accusatory posts aimed at others?.........is thst whom you are defending Simple, eh?
The whole OSAS doctrine is ignorant Simple because it is unbiblical and you are just as ignorant to believe in it.

Skombolis wrote:

The reason myself and others argue against OSAS doctrine it is espouses after literally as little as perhaps a minutes of belief one could technically spend the rest of their life murdering and rapikng and they would still be saved.

Skombolis wrote:

We remain responsible for our actions.

Grace Walker wrote:

Its a little hypocritical of you, and you have been doing this since you came on here. ost. Its quite simple.

Grace Walker wrote:

<quoted text>
DID he just call you NAMES?? OH NO!! Not the great Skumballs. He just contradicted himself AGAIN!! But dont call him names, He will whine about it for days..

Black Thunder 42 wrote:

<quoted text> Both and all. This thread is a perfect example of the mountain of conflict involved. Why, is there an "expert" believer? Even that would not suffice. I would prefer to talk to the horse's mouth, rather than the other end.
In lieu of that option, one can only read the item(s) and apply knowledge and common sense...something I have noticed is often supplanted by willful ignorance and narcissistic arrogance.

Skombolis wrote:

<quoted text>
My attitude is worse than someone not having the same take of a verse than me?
Please give me an example Debra
As of today I still have never attacks a single person's beliefs first. And the people I have been arguing with are people who have been telling others that people who don't believe as them are of the devil, blinded from God, don't trust Christ, don't have faith, etc.
Are you serious?
No offense my friend but you have always sided with friends first and since these are all your Facebook buddies I think either you haven't read the beginnings of the conversations or don't care. And I don't owe anybody an apology over JohnJaws. I ignored at least 20 of his posts for every one I responded to. I am not going to be a permanent punching bag because otherwise some of the more sensitive posters may not like me.
Do what you have to do and post where you have to post. But your problem with how i respond to people telling me I am of the devil and blind and don't Christ is quite frankly your problem

trifecta1 wrote:

<quoted text>iyai! you is on quite a high horse, you writing is almost as arrogant and haughty as the freethinkers on here.
How we know you is not a thief or hate you neighbor? because you happen to write it on a billboard? you seem very determined to undermine the jesus follower because he say he is a jesus follower and you no like what he write. I never know Jesus gave up his throne to you. That news to me.