Comments
463,481 - 463,500 of 599,964 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#481679 Jan 29, 2013
Brother Lee Love wrote:
<quoted text>You've encountered some confused believers, then.
Most are.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#481680 Jan 29, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
The Christian theory does every time. It is an excuse to play God and tell others you are right and they are wrong.
Ruach Ha'Kodesh is in every living creature, unless Genesis is a pack of lies.
Perhaps you should ask a Jew to explain their language to you.
You keep using the Christian theory.Not everyone holds with what mankind theory is.I do not need a excuse to read scriptures.
You delight in piting one belief against another belief.But if that is what rolls your wheels so be it.
fogn

Rochester, PA

#481681 Jan 29, 2013
youtube.com/watch...
Hope? theres no Jesus

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#481683 Jan 29, 2013
Counter_Strike wrote:
<quoted text>
Indeed, you are very sorry.
CS.
Nah.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#481684 Jan 29, 2013
Counter_Strike wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmm....interesting.
Very interesting indeed.
This is like your first not negative post to me. You have a negative, holier than thou attitude.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#481685 Jan 29, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
The rabbits are not evidence of anything exept variation WITHIN A SPECIES, just like skin color in humans.
False. The rabbits have since evolved into 4 species. They aren't like skin color variation in humans - not even close. Skin color variation, as you appear not to know, is due to 7 genes that are under environmental selection pressure. They aren't connected to any other genes and certainly don't make for separate species.

I find it amusing, though, that you claim we cannot understand speciation by observing its underlying genetic processes. It is exactly like you are claiming that we cannot know the Big Bang happened because of background microwave radiation - after all, no one was around then. All we have are the results of the Big Bang.

Evolution is an ongoing process. And we directly observe the processes in the lab, in nature. Add that to our ability to compare the DNA from ancient bones to extant organisms, morphological comparisons between fossils and extant species, development of fossils and, more importantly, extant species

You are ignorantly claiming that none of that is good enough. It's laughable that you then mock my scientific background while demonstrating an almost entire lack of scientific knowledge.
Try again without sounding like a creationist.
I will pass on your opinion of my anthropological training to Penn State.
As it suits your self-confidence, be my guest. You weren't able to handle my explanation of why your critique of the mtDNA observation was incorrect, just like you aren't able to understand how species work, what a framework theory is, or what the theory of evolution is and how it underlies all biological sciences, provides an explanatory framework for all biological pheonomena.

Based on your ignorance of the above, I cannot believe you have a BSc in Anth. Very likely a BA.

And when you present weak minded attacks that rely on misrepresentation and quote mining, I'll correct you regardless. Just like I'll correct any creationist.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#481686 Jan 29, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
"Definition: The term species can be defined as a group of individual organisms that are capable of interbreeding to produce fertile offspring in nature. A species is, according to this definition, the largest gene pool that exists under natural conditions. Thus, if a pair of organisms are capable of producing offspring in nature, they must belong to the same species.
Unfortunately, in practice, this definition is plagued by ambiguities. To begin, this definition is not relevant to organisms (such as many types of bacteria) that are capable of asexual reproduction. If the definition of a species requires that two individuals are capable of interbreeding, then an organism that does not interbreed is outside of that definition.
Another difficulty that arises when defining the term species is that some species are capable of forming hybrids. For example, many of the large cat species are capable of hybridizing. A cross between a female lions and a male tiger produces a liger. A cross between a male jaguar and a female lion produces a jaglion. There are a number of other crosses possible among the panther species, but they are not considered to be all members of a single species as such crosses are very rare or do not occur at all in nature.
Species form through a process called speciation. Speciation takes place when the lineage of a single splits into two or more separate species. New species can form in this manner as a result of several potential causes such as geographic isoloation or a reduction in gene flow among members of the population.
When considered in the context of classification, the term species refers to the most refined level within the hierarchy of major taxonomic ranks (though it should be noted that in some cases species are further divided into subspecies, but that term lacks clear and consistent definition)."
http://animals.about.com/od/s/g/species.htm
No kidding.

Now add in the more sophisticated description of "species" that I provided you several pages back and you'll understand more about evolution.

Also, please note that speciation differs from evolution. You made mistakes in previous pages by conflating the two.

But I'm glad you're reading more. It's possible you'll soon understand what I wrote and apologize for your attacks on my character.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481687 Jan 30, 2013
Counter_Strike wrote:
Who was Jesus?
Do you mean the famous one?
Counter_Strike wrote:
And who did those priests or somebody's learn it from?
A previous generation of priests.
Counter_Strike wrote:
when you and your kind have your way in degrading society, plunging it into the cesspool of lawlessness and perverted morals then will it be the end of the age of gentiles
I think you have that backwards. I'm thinking it will be more like flushing a cesspool. Your church demeans and degrades mankind. It opposes learning and science. It creates untold fear and guilt. If that's the age of the gentiles, then it's overstayed its welcome already. I'm certain that we can do a better job generating good and happy citizens than your church did.

We're going to find out, aren't we? I'm sure that you wish us godspeed.
Counter_Strike wrote:
Take care of your own house, wake up out of your drunken stupor and watch for the thief so that your house not be broken up and your party ends in ruins. For if you had watched your house, then a thief would not take you by surprise because you were expecting him...seeing him from afar off. Yet you fail to see the thief, and if you continue to be blinded by your hedonistic, irresponsible behavior then you may have your very own soul stolen too.
Your schizophrenia is flaring, Fisher King.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481688 Jan 30, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
Unfortunately for you Catcher its that 98% of the crooked lawyers that make the honest 2% of you look bad..........
Now you're calling the lawyers 98% dishonest? "Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481689 Jan 30, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
you have no idea how ignorant I am
That's incorrect. You've left quite a few clues, like that comment.

“Ungood doubleplus duckspeak.”

Since: Dec 12

Earth

#481690 Jan 30, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
I find it strange that so many will defend Paul more than Jesus Himself.

If someone says "Paul was a pagan" they get more flack than if they say "Jesus was just a Jew on a stick."
Thunder bolt.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481691 Jan 30, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
Forward, my Sancho Panza! Pick up your heels, Rocinante!
No kidding. Good call.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481692 Jan 30, 2013
lil whispers wrote:
First of you posted me I did not post you.
Perhaps. Is that relevant? Did you have a point with that?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
As a human being, I find your description offensive. If you made a comment like that about Jews or gays, you would be rightly and harshly castigated for it. You speak only for your own family, not the entire human race. You're not really one of us any more, are you?
lil whispers wrote:
I never been one of you to start with.
Yes you were. You just can't remember any more.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481693 Jan 30, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
.. lil whispers may want to re-think his/her position ..
I'm guessing that Lil Whiskas didn't think it through the first time, that his opinions were given to him, and he absorbed them uncritically.

“Ungood doubleplus duckspeak.”

Since: Dec 12

Earth

#481694 Jan 30, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>That's incorrect. You've left quite a few clues, like that comment.
Lol @ both of you :)

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481695 Jan 30, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
Lill whisper is female name,elder person,verysweet believer only Bible not any worldwide church
but you f....idiot not having idea who this person is,
you just asusse her,insult her.
Whiskas is a she? OK. Sorry, ma'am.

Her age is not a factor. It's the misanthropic garbage that flows from here that is relevant here. If she's willing to spew it in a mixed forum, she needs to be strong enough to deal with the blow back.

As I said, just substitute any group you'd like into her comment to see if she is offensive or not:

Blacks are greedy, jealous, selfish, foolish, ignorant
Jews are greedy, jealous, selfish, foolish, ignorant
Mankind is greedy, jealous, selfish, foolish, ignorant

Sorry, but I take offense at that. What's the difference between those three? And what is sweet about a person that writes like that?

As I have already noted, Christian misanthropy is a deep pessimism for mankind which, as a human being, I resent. If it were not other human beings saying these things about us - if a second intellectual and verbal species evolved on earth, or colonized earth from elsewhere, and spoke about humanity like that - they would be just as despised, and there would probably eventually be war. Every human being should reject and resent such a depiction of our species.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481696 Jan 30, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
there is not you f...atheistic business you mother f....sick pervert to complain about someone own free choice to worship God
I didn't. Please feel free to worship however you like - in private. Free to nail a chicken to a stick, anoint it with sheep blood, affix jingly bells to it, and shake it over your head at the full moon if that's what gives your life meaning, moral grounding, and a framework for understanding the universe. Go for it!

But if you want to take it public and share the chicken's vile opinions with polite society, be prepared to defend yourself. You don't get to pull out the sweet little old lady card after you post such provocative language.
Dr Shrink wrote:
WHAT A HECK ALLOW YOU TO VIOLATE 2 AMENDMENT OF CONSTITUTION OF FREE SPEACHES AND FREE OWN CHOSEN RELIGION OR WORSHIP
That's one amendment, Braindeath.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481697 Jan 30, 2013
lil whispers wrote:
you do not like my God who moves in mysterious ways.
There's nothing mysterious about any of this.

And you don't get to hide behind your god. You chose to post those words. They're yours now.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481698 Jan 30, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
Do you read Bible at all

ON YOUR SWEET MOUTH FULL OF COW MANURE AND RATS URINES
I don't need to. It seems that you read it enough for both of us. And look at how much it has done for you.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#481699 Jan 30, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
lil whispers may want to re-think his/her position ..
lil whispers wrote:
No position to rethink.
She forgot that. I already told her.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
tÉlÉcharger coeur de pirate mistral gagnant mp3 2 min Alizee 1
tÉlÉcharger enrique iglesias bailando mp3 2 min Alizee 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min Buck Crick 733,122
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min June VanDerMark 539,034
tÉlÉcharger deorro five hours mp3 3 min Alizee 1
tÉlÉcharger shakira dare mp3 4 min Alizee 1
tÉlÉcharger pitbull, jennifer lopez & cludia le... 4 min Alizee 1
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Charlie Sheen 258,035
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Anon 226,368
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 4 hr Falcon 751
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••