Why Should Jesus Love Me?

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

Comments (Page 23,169)

Showing posts 463,361 - 463,380 of596,815
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Pepsi is better than coke”

Since: Mar 11

and better with rum

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481444
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, it wasn't hard to find them and there were a whole litter to choose from... but I kind I felt like it would be fruitless to send as someone would have to at least care about the facts.
They aren't facts. They are fraudulent attempts by creationists to fool people like you. First, the lists hold mostly people who have no background and are not working in biological science. Second, any random list of biological scientists who are not evolution (science) deniers is larger - the Steve list is larger.
<quoted text>I guess the simple response to that would be... "that's not true". I'm not bold enough to say that none have been discredited... but then again, I'm not that bold enough to imply that "they've all been discredited." You see, in materialists, naturalists, evolutionary scientists (whatever you want to call them)... they also discredit each other... one may come up with an idea that may be close to discovery but then someone comes along and says something entirely different but on the same trajectory. So a scientist, whether evolutionary or creationary being discredited is simply normal business throughout the decades. Also, what may interest you is I've seen that sometimes a scientist would be discredited only later to find out that he/she had been right all along.
Evolution has never been disproved, not once.

Scientists do not discredit each other, they disagree with each other about the details of evolution. I'm sorry that you have been duped by the fraudulent creationist misrepresentations of science. The scientists so misquoted and misrepresented themselves often clarify the creationist falsehoods.

More importantly, why are you basing your knowledge on other people's ignorance? The whole "scientists discredit each other" myth that creationists push rests on your ignorance and your inability to seek real answers.

You automatically think "ha! If they don't know, then I am right!" That's trash. You cannot base your knowledge on someone else's ignorance. If you do so, you don't have knowledge, you have empty, untested belief.

But we both know that you don't actually know that much about science. Your arguments so far have been based in ignorance and personal incredulity. Don't write to me "you people don't know, so I am right" or "you people argue about science, so I am right (even though I don't understand the arguments)."

Write to me "creationism declares X and X is what we observe in nature. In fact, we use X to predict Y and produce treatment Z. That's how powerful X is." What creationist observations do we have? None. What creationist predictions do we have about nature? None. What creationist technology or solutions do we have about nature? None.

The thing is, you creationists scream and rant all you like, but you never produce new knowledge or technology. You are incapable of solving real world problems like malaria or tuberculosis - let's not forget the creationist "disease as sin" model. You are incapable of explaining why pathogens exist, how to treat them, how to eradicate them, why they affect us as they do.

Or something like sperm competition. Why do most types of human sperm not fertilize, but instead act to destroy other sperm or to block other sperm?

Evolution answers these questions with ease. It produces all kinds of medical technology and medical knowledge.

Creationism doesn't. It's a religious belief - a fiction, an imagined reality that for you is real because you are utterly ignorant with regards to biology and biological science. And your masters want - need - you ignorant, because they like your money.

“Paul is a confessed liar”

Since: Jul 11

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481445
Jan 29, 2013
 
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
....In science, there are no competing theories.....
I certainly hope there is competing theories or its no more than a religion and I have been doing it wrong all these years.

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481446
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Juicylu wrote:
<quoted text>
Awww thanx <3 LOL! I love it, may I use it? Cheers :)
.. morning diamonds ..

.. my, you're collecting negative judgeits. Did you steal someone's God ??..

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481447
Jan 29, 2013
 
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Evolution answers these questions with ease. It produces all kinds of medical technology and medical knowledge.
.. morning sweetness ..

.. you forgot to say, "All biology is based on evolutionary theory." ..

.. always liked that one ..

.. Tide promises to return you to the trunk shortly ..

“Paul is a confessed liar”

Since: Jul 11

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481448
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
...
Write to me "creationism declares X and X is what we observe in nature.....
Creationism declares that nothing on Earth changes and species can not change.

Since we can observe the planet changing and the differentiation wihtin species, that disproves Creationism.

Only someone who is so insane as to believe that words in a book are facts and the reality around them is false can accept the Static Model of Life and the Cosmos as described in Genesis.

BTW, According to Genesis, the moon does not exist nor do any planets. Don't see them jumping on THAT particular bandwagon of lunacy.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481449
Jan 29, 2013
 
Qu_innocence wrote:
why would anyone believe that creation itself is only around 6000 years old is beyond me.
They think it because they believe that their bible tells them so. Nothing else is necessary. They also believe that a snake talked, and that the sky could hold enough rain to cover the tallest peaks, deposit it in only forty days, then have it evaporate and disappear from earth. Reason isn't part of the formula. Faith is.
Qu_innocence wrote:
The "days" in Genesis is a word that would describe "era's" or "eons".
Do eras and eons have a morning and an evening? The days of creation do. What's the problem with 24 hour days? The contradictory evidence?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481450
Jan 29, 2013
 
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to encourage him - he's welcome to stop :)
Well...

I DID say two.

Maybe he'll forget that they're free.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481451
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
They aren't facts. They are fraudulent attempts by creationists to fool people like you. First, the lists hold mostly people who have no background and are not working in biological science. Second, any random list of biological scientists who are not evolution (science) deniers is larger - the Steve list is larger.
<quoted text>
Evolution has never been disproved, not once.
Scientists do not discredit each other, they disagree with each other about the details of evolution. I'm sorry that you have been duped by the fraudulent creationist misrepresentations of science. The scientists so misquoted and misrepresented themselves often clarify the creationist falsehoods.
More importantly, why are you basing your knowledge on other people's ignorance? The whole "scientists discredit each other" myth that creationists push rests on your ignorance and your inability to seek real answers.
You automatically think "ha! If they don't know, then I am right!" That's trash. You cannot base your knowledge on someone else's ignorance. If you do so, you don't have knowledge, you have empty, untested belief.
But we both know that you don't actually know that much about science. Your arguments so far have been based in ignorance and personal incredulity. Don't write to me "you people don't know, so I am right" or "you people argue about science, so I am right (even though I don't understand the arguments)."
Write to me "creationism declares X and X is what we observe in nature. In fact, we use X to predict Y and produce treatment Z. That's how powerful X is." What creationist observations do we have? None. What creationist predictions do we have about nature? None. What creationist technology or solutions do we have about nature? None.
The thing is, you creationists scream and rant all you like, but you never produce new knowledge or technology. You are incapable of solving real world problems like malaria or tuberculosis - let's not forget the creationist "disease as sin" model. You are incapable of explaining why pathogens exist, how to treat them, how to eradicate them, why they affect us as they do.
Or something like sperm competition. Why do most types of human sperm not fertilize, but instead act to destroy other sperm or to block other sperm?
Evolution answers these questions with ease. It produces all kinds of medical technology and medical knowledge.
Creationism doesn't. It's a religious belief - a fiction, an imagined reality that for you is real because you are utterly ignorant with regards to biology and biological science. And your masters want - need - you ignorant, because they like your money.
Well said would be an understatement.

Bravo!

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481452
Jan 29, 2013
 
Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>Amen... Britain currently has the most accurate from what I understand... but what is even more accurate than those are the revolution of the planets in our Solar System. It was perfectly, methodically engineered by an Intelligence...
So then while the intelligent design people say that complexity is a sign of intelligence, you say that mechanical simplicity is.

It sounds like you might be seeing god in everything the way somebody wearing blue shades sees blue in everything.

And you're not alone. Millions or billions of people see the same thing you do. But millions or billions of us just scratch our heads and wonder why you see a god in what we see as godless. How can we decide who is seeing reality and who isn't? Is it important to do so?

“Which ~*god*~?”

Since: Dec 12

Hell, Norway

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481453
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
How ethnocentric of you.
Not surprising in the least.
How so? How presumptuous of you. I do find that surprising.

“Which ~*god*~?”

Since: Dec 12

Hell, Norway

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481454
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. morning diamonds ..
.. my, you're collecting negative judgeits. Did you steal someone's God ??..
Lol...it has always been that way, I don't presume to know why but I do have stalkers.

“Paul is a confessed liar”

Since: Jul 11

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481455
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.... "All biology is based on evolutionary theory." .....
You have that backwards.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481456
Jan 29, 2013
 
Juicylu wrote:
Awww thanx <3 LOL! I love it, may I use it?
Cheers :)
I'm glad you liked it.

It's not mine to give, but I'm pretty sure that Al would be good with it.

“Pepsi is better than coke”

Since: Mar 11

and better with rum

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481457
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>No, I actually believe the earth is possibly billions and billions of years old... there are young-earth theorists and old-earth theoristist... both groups are Creationists but differ it not only the age of the earth but of creation itself. I mean, it can take millions to billions of years of starlight to get to us so why would anyone believe that creation itself is only around 6000 years old is beyond me. The "days" in Genesis is a word that would describe "era's" or "eons". Now I used to believe in young-earth creationism... that is before I asked any questions.
<quoted text>No.. HFY.. actually you are partly correct. I was christened in the RCC, was born of Catholic parents... but I've left the RCC for around 24 years now. Now, I remember when G_O_D and I were going back and forth on Darwin... but as I was sending out certain studies... I had come to learn that evolution... at least the concept did not "originally" start with Darwin or his father or his grandfather... but it is a very old concept way before the Darwins were a twinkle in ol' Pappy's eye... it just that, that old concept wasn't called evolution. Makes me want to go and find it again.
Uhm...you may have to disregard my previous post :)

Ok, so you are not using the standard definition of creationism and instead using a "long earth" version - a sort of hands off version. Your premise is that God Created the universe, with a Plan, and we are the result.

Yes, lots of scientists believe the very same. Although I daresay they don't reflect very deeply on their beliefs, nor question them as vigorously as they do their science.

First, believing that your deity created the universe is not scientifically supportable. It's an inference. Atheism is also an inference. However, I argue that atheism - or, at least - non-belief in any human-imagined deity - has the backing of the social sciences, if not the hard sciences.

But I only have evidence on my side, not testable, disprovable hypotheses, so I'll concede that atheism, like theism, is an inference.

Second, there are 2 problems with the Christian belief that their God Created the universe.

1. Why your deity and not any other from any other religion? Neither you nor any believer has empirical evidence that supports personal belief in your deities. Of course you all have personal experiences that prove your religion to you - but these are encultured experiences; your brain is the product of your culture and religion and so you have culture and religious specific experiences.

2. The world around us is not as your mythological texts describe. Further, the deity described in those texts does not fit the deity believed and worshiped by people. Take disease, for example. Unless you are going to concede that God does not share human morality, you're going to have a tough time explaining the high mortality rates of impoverished children to disease. And, once you concede that God could not share human morality, if He existed, then you've lost Omnibenevolence. And we can continue from here.

To sum: while scientists may also be believers, and therefore believe the universe was Created, they are doing so by not overly scrutinizing their beliefs. Nor are they suggesting that humans were specially created by your deity, that we didn't evolve.

“Pepsi is better than coke”

Since: Mar 11

and better with rum

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481458
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Qu_innocence wrote:
@ HFY... now, it is crazy distance from the earth to the moon (not looking it up but it's many, many thousands of miles)... and 93 million miles away from the sun (I do remember that from elemetary).
Now concerning our own Solar System, if we could figure it out in miles... could you imagine what the square miles of our own solar system would be? It would be insurmountable. And as you know there are billions upon billions of systems and constellations out there.
So on this little planet of ours within our solar system... it is literally "teeming" with all sorts of life, so much so that it is mind-blowing. Whether animate or inanimate... and all sorts of life and species still yet to be discovered on our own little planet. So you mean to tell me that out of the whole, vast solar system of ours we just happen to be the only one that is "naturally selected" out-of-the-blue to be teeming with life? No dear... I don't think so. It was planned, it was designed and it was intentional.
1. Yes, the solar system is big.

2. No, it's not teeming with life. The earth is, that's true.

3. You don't know that other solar systems don't have life.

4. Just because the solar system and universe are large, and that ours houses life, does not prove that they were intelligently designed.

5. In fact, it demonstrates the opposite. Why don't other planets in our solar system have life? How could a designer be so poor at designing?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481459
Jan 29, 2013
 
Epiphany2 wrote:
Encouraging Words....
The earnest prayer of a righteous person has great power and produces wonderful results.
James 5:16
K-Love
With all due respect, what do these words encourage apart from prayer? To an unbeliever, they're not encouraging words. To a believer, they are an affirmation that he or she can make difference by praying.

Does it matter to you whether the words are true or not? What if the claim could be tested? Would you want to know the results, even if they contradicted the claim? If you love truth, I think that your answer has to be "yes." Do you disagree?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481460
Jan 29, 2013
 
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
I watched it on Netflix.
I'd love to hear your and hiding's thoughts on it.
Looking up the title now. For some reason, it sometimes takes a while to connect. I think I need a better wireless router.
Aha. That took a while.
It's The Human Family Tree.
You can watch it here, too:
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/human-family-t...
Wow! Thanks. Today's a full day, but I'll be looking at that ASAP.

“Pepsi is better than coke”

Since: Mar 11

and better with rum

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481461
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>I saw a chart about the RCC and their own evolution... it was somewhere in that timeline where they were more open to evolution.
Believers believe in evolution because that is what they were taught in school... they had no choice. I can get in the whole spill about how it started to get taught in the classrooms but that is for another day unless someone would like to do due diligence on their own and look for it for themselves which would be plus. Nevertheless, Evolution wasn't always taught in schools but when it did arrive on the scene it didn't come without racism (survival of the fittest)... and I understand Darwin used animals to make this point but the powers that believe politically-corrected it for their own prejudices. Not just the fittest of whites against blacks but even whites against whites in Europe. Scientific racism actually...
Evolution and Eugenics are intertwined... Survival of the fittest.
Only someone who doesn't understand evolution could write what you wrote. All of us evolutionary theorists have moved on beyond the early 20th century. That was, what, a hundred years ago?

Science isn't stagnant like dogma.

And...all evidence demonstrates evolution. Francis Crick, Christian, quoted on this thread by Serah, wrote that "if you don't accept evolution, you aren't educated." The evidence for evolution is overwhelming. It has never been disproved, not once.

And you creationists have never, not once, put up a theoretical framework for your story. The very best you can do is rest your belief on your inability to understand science. You never rest your belief on evidence. Nor on application - creationism is incapable of producing new knowledge and technology.

So the very best you have is deception, misdirection and ignorance.

Well done.

When you come up with a theoretical framework or a medicine, let me know.

“Pepsi is better than coke”

Since: Mar 11

and better with rum

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481462
Jan 29, 2013
 
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess I would have to make a distinction between Natural Eugenics and Gov't enforced Eugenics. However, both are evolutionary forces.
I'd have to disagree with you here - mostly over your use of language.

Calling natural selection eugenics is misusing the term eugenics. If we do that, then we fail to understand how human enforced breeding programs differ from death because of environmental forces.

Second, gov't enforced eugenics leads to evolutionary change in the short term in that gene frequencies in gene pools change. However, it cannot lead to long term evolution unless the society strictly carries out the eugenics schemes for a very long time - longer than any society has yet existed.

If they could, though, you'd have powerful, directed evolution.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#481463
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
hahaha!
How many religions are there? Every single believer of every single religion "knows" that they are "correct" - just like you do.
So...forgive me for not believing in your evil deity. Why should I take yours over any other religion's?
Honestly do not know how many religions there are.No wrong not all believers think in this way.No is only one of me and they do not think like me.You could not have what I have you have to go and seek your own.

Tis nothing to forgive cause I never ask you to believe.I do not have a regilion for you to take or join.What I do have is a personal walk with God and in doin that walk I share.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 463,361 - 463,380 of596,815
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

550 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Divinity Surgeon 682,983
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 12 min Dang It 110,381
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 35 min scaritual 218,172
4 word game (use same Letter) (Mar '13) 37 min andet1987 791
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 39 min Gods R Delusions x Mine 513,521
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 39 min andet1987 3,995
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 39 min RADEKT 250,743
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr EdmondWA 89,782
•••
•••
•••