Why Should Jesus Love Me?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478329 Jan 18, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>hi skom?
where is conveor behind you,did you sell on flohmart,or stole from your boss?

stick more pipe of manitou,not your two left wolf teeths will be black,but also a...

pfuj how ugly you are
are you living in the cave?
Skom? What?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478330 Jan 18, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Oh yeah, there's hot Indian models & lawyers al over Topix.....
Lol

“Painters Find Beauty in Life ”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#478333 Jan 18, 2013
Bonsoir,

The incident with the Serbian lady was the most touching and heartfelt thing I have seen Sora do. We have met many like her, people who go through crises and tragedies are meant to be consoled not spit upon. There is more than enough evil and cruelty in this world what we need is love and compassion and I believe it starts with one person at a time. Now I can see that Sora and myself live not in vain.*Sobs*

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#478334 Jan 18, 2013
Here For Now wrote:
<quoted text>
Matthew 15:11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.


Hi HFN.

I keep forgetting that this thread has become a pulpit for some
of topix's most rabid wanna be christian preachers..
Everytime I look in here, I wonder how we could ever take
it back? I know we never will though..

Has been a long time, my friend..Miss you and hope you are well.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478335 Jan 18, 2013
Red Apples wrote:
<quoted text>Annie the post you left in here a couple weeks ago was you complaining about the actions of a certain poster claiming to be a Christian that was posting in the WINLAC thread. You left 2 links to that thread that you wanted people to look at.

So I made the comment back to you that what that poster was saying in that thread (that you felt the need to drag in here to complain about) was no worse than the things Kaitlin was saying in that thread. And that they both should be equally dealt with in that thread and not dragged in here like you did.

But of course we all know that would never happen in that thread now don't we Annie? Because there's a double standard when it comes to who can act how in that thread now isn't there Annie?

You dragged what was going on in that thread in here trying to stir things up in here. It wasn't dragged in here by me or anyone else Annie. It was dragged in here by you!!!

So I didn't deflect anything. You're the one that brought the dirty laundry from that thread in here. And when you got back what you gave out you didn't like it. And of course per your usual pattern you're now back claiming to be a victim as you try to fly your "I'm a martyr" flag.

It won't fly in here Annie. Perhaps you should try flying it back in the WINLAC thread Annie. I mean think about it Annie. They love to jump on and complain about any bad acting Christian while turning their backs on the actions of those of yours and their ilk. So it will probably fly in there and garner you the sympathy you're seeking.

Have a nice night and a great day tomorrow Annie.
Wow.... I agree with a lot of that RA but didn't see the link you're referring to.
<3

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478336 Jan 18, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>Most Lawyers, I wouldnt think, would spend day after day on topix. But I will say this, its just like a lawyer to spend day after day on topix and screw his clientelle.

Maybe he is lawyer after all..........

Clementia is a model?

I doubt thats really her in the pic. she wouldn't be the first to post a fake pic. And wont be the last......... In fact why would a model post her pic on topix? Big risk if you ask me..........
Even if one is not a model :( you were right.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478338 Jan 18, 2013
Clementia wrote:
<quoted text>I've said 100 times, that is a pic of an Indian actress, who my family and friends and my mirror tell me i look like.

I'll be posting my real pic later on!!
Don't do it Clementia....

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478339 Jan 18, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>Your gonna have to excuse me for not reading your posts..........
Lol... There goes my fairy dust...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478340 Jan 18, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need those books.

Ethical is my middle name.
Lol @ both of you.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478341 Jan 18, 2013
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>Hi RA,
Yes, we are definitly a work in progress.:)
I wasn't even aware of any of those things. We all say things and do things that we shouldn't. We all get angry and forget why we are on here. Its all good!! Forgive and forget is my motto<smile> Have a blessed night my friend. I love reading your post. Just posting about Gods love for people should be our focus. I may need you to remind me of that from time to time also.
Amen <3

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#478342 Jan 18, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
You're certainly doing your part.
Thanks. I don't figure you're perfect either.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
And what does that mean specifically? What are you suggesting that I should do differently to accept responsibility for my shortcomings? Submit and beg forgiveness for being human?
No. Nothing wrong with being human, and being human is no excuse to commit atrocities and destroy the earth. Our apologies are to be for be for the way we treat each other and the way we treat creation in general.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
That's secular humanism's agenda,not the church's. It's philosophy is divisive, pessimistic, misanthropic, obstructionist, and sterile. What has it produced of value that couldn't be done as well or better without it?
Has nothing to do with either being secular or the church's agenda, it's everyone's agenda and in everyone's interest to get right or be in big trouble on a planet we call home. Everything doesn't have to seem so divisive to you. Not because the church wants to draw clear lines means you also have to do the same. that wouldn't make you look any better. You would just be replacing theocratic tyranny with a secular autocracy. Indeed, the church has brought much flak upon itself and well deserved, but what makes you think you or secular rule would be any better? It would probably end up being quite a beastly abomination of the worse type of tyrannical rule, much worse that the church could ever birth upon humanity.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
The planet has become better every time authoritarian, faith based thought has been replaced by reason and evidence based thought,as when theocracies became secular democracies, and revelation and superstition became science.
Really? Give me an example then. I'm sure you won't say The United States. Dubai and Qatar U.A.E. are Islamic countries and they seem to do quite well for themselves. Do you disagree?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
This is the legacy of Judeo-Christianity:
”Reason must be deluded, blinded, and destroyed. Faith must trample underfoot all reason, sense, and understanding, and whatever it sees must be put out of sight and ... know nothing but the word of God." - Martin Lutherm, father of Protestantism.
Excellent example. All from a racist that was excommunicated by his church and Germanic Luther bible, banned. Surely you can do much better than this.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Here's is one of your most prominent intellectuals today -a philosopher, no less - on reason
"...And my view here is, that the way in which I know Christianity is true is first and foremost on the basis of the witness of the Holy Spirit. In my heart. And that this gives me a self-authenticating means of knowing that Christianity is true wholly apart from the evidence. And therefore, if in some historically contingent circumstances, the evidence that I have available to me should turn against Christianity, I don't think that that contraverts the witness of the Holy Spirit. >>>snipped for space<<<< He said that if reason contradicts his faith, he would ignore reason and wait for his faith to seem reasonable again to him.
Interesting. Prominent intellectual you say. An intellectual that doesn't know that the Savior never started Christianity, it was a Roman concoction of stolen Hebraic ideas that were perverted and names changed and rearranged. An intellectual that may appear to understand history but ends up accepting everything he was told rather than study enough for himself, just like most other people. I have no issue with William Lane Craig, but if he really wrote this stuff, then I believe you better find better examples. I'm sure he must have had better examples of faith and reason (I would hope for his sake). I understand where you may want to go with this, but I'll observe a bit more.

Andrew (CS).

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478343 Jan 18, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>Unlike you, I have no need for sock puppets, Dave.

Dave Nelson. If it isn't him, then he's got a clone running loose.
I thought his name was Duane, I don't know who Dave Nelson is. I see you're feeling better :D

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478344 Jan 18, 2013
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>Amen Peace Warrior.
I agree. We should take our focus OFF our differences and put our focus back where it belongs..On Jesus Christ. Jesus made it easy for us to be reconciled back to God but then we humans turn around and try to make it hard again. I cant wrap my mind around this sometime. God Bless
Amen <3

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#478345 Jan 18, 2013
Peace_Warrior wrote:
<quoted text>That is why we should only have good news to share for old things are passed away, Ja? No evil, no devil, only bathed in God's Love and walk in His Light. It is sad to witness all confusion...

True... nothing more between such needs to be said, but a greeting in His Love never went astray.
Take Care dr shrink, and I trust your ducks are still happy!
Have a good night and Blessings always.
Beautifully said <3

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#478346 Jan 18, 2013
Drew H wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi, Le le.
Yes we always have to be careful and keep our guards up. You never know when someone will accuse and set traps. We are cautioned in the Bible about that. It is the work of the devil, and he is seeking those that he can destroy.
I'm glad you responded. I needed my ego fix this morning. I think I can make it through the rest of the day now LOL.
Yeah, thinking of cribbage brings back memories of my brother as we enjoyed the game many, many times. And a 7 would make the best hand.
Thanks for the Friday wishes and I hope you have a great day and an even better weekend.
I pulled back quite a bit a few years ago, when I realized
that we shouldn't trust others online.

Hahaha! Anytime..
Hope your day was a good one.
Mine was nice, so happy it's Friday..

My dad had a stroke a couple years ago and doesn;t want to play cribbage anymore..
I miss playing cards w him..

Wishing you and your family the best, as always..

Go Pat's!!
LOL!

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#478347 Jan 18, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
In this post, you ask if I mean 'submit'. You repeat yourself here:
(1) http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...
(2) http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...
(3) http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...
(4) http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR... #

Yes, your line hasn't changed, but I can tell you're trying to drain the conversation of life by not being original. I await your originality.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Do you ever support your claims, as I just did above, or simply make them? What question are you referring to.Please show me a link of my question, a link with your reply, and then a subsequent link with me asking the question again. I doubt that you can.
I just did. what else would you like to see?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Is that a fancy way of saying, "people that won't submit"? That seems to be what you are most frustrated about with me.
Nope. If I do have any frustrations about you is that you're trying to annoy me. Why? Beats me. Of course, because you're secular means you know way more than I do. I wonder where the real you is hiding.

:)
It aint necessarily so wrote:
But you're not a Christian, right?
"Follow" ... does that also mean submit?
Sorry, I but am a bipedal ape, one of a magnificent species. I was born to stand upright, not to grovel.
I can't say I'm wholly and solely thrilled to be having a conversation with an ape, but if I give you a cyber banana, would you promise to say something original and not read out of a book?

LOL x 20

Ok my magnificent Ape friend; would you like to go shake hands and hug your cousin, a 500lb silverback Gorilla in the San Diego zoo? I suppose not. I hope you wouldn't do something so foolish even though you would be greeting your relative.

Andrew (CS).

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#478348 Jan 18, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
You're wrong.
Yup. True to form.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Are we back to submission again? Didn't you just accuse me of repeating myself? You're a one note tune.
Indeed, and you're the other crooked note on the key. You can choose to respond properly, unless you can't, but if you won't, then that's not contributing to a discussion now is it.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
How are those mutually exclusive? If you are right about the latter, then you did both.
I call it the way I see it. If they turn out not to be mutually exclusive from each other then so be it. Moving along.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Are we back to the embroidered throw pillows again? You and I should consider going into business together selling demotivational slogans.
Running out of answers so soon?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Because we're rebellious and won't submit, right?
You said it, I didn't. Since you keep repeating it, then that may well be your honest feeling. So don't wait for me to queue you in, submit if you want to. I don't need to hold your hand for you to submit to His will. You don't need my approval to do so.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
It's about time. His behavior thus far has been indistinguishable from nonexistence.
I wouldn't be too anxious if I were you. Your opinion of Him won't make Him go away...you may eventually wish He did.
simplyput

Aurora, CO

#478350 Jan 18, 2013
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
I pulled back quite a bit a few years ago, when I realized
that we shouldn't trust others online.
Hahaha! Anytime..
Hope your day was a good one.
Mine was nice, so happy it's Friday..
My dad had a stroke a couple years ago and doesn;t want to play cribbage anymore..
I miss playing cards w him..
Wishing you and your family the best, as always..
Go Pat's!!
LOL!
Oh, I love cribbage , it is my pasttime. I play all the time.
I got a 29 the other night. I was thrilled! that rarely happens.
Going to try some tournaments.

my post number is 1269
I could use a 7 or a 4, LOL

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#478351 Jan 18, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
So, if I will just submit now, I will get the pie in the sky later? This is a slave philosophy complete with a slave ethic. The Sermon on the Mount is a set of instructions from the ruling class to the peasant class on how to think and behave as they are being exploited and discriminated against.
What pie in the sky? You think the understanding is that human beings will dwell in heaven forever and ever? You didn't read the bible did you. Also,matters not where the rules came from as long as the rules are moral and just,and certainly the 10 Commandments are moral and just. People generally tend to hate rules. they feel restricted by them and they see rules as impeding freedom. Well, you should obey the speed limit whether you like it or not. The rule is not debatable. Break the rule, get a ticket. It's very simple. You don't need to approve of it.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Let's look:
Blessed, supposedly, are the poor in spirit, those who mourn, the meek, those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, the merciful, the pure in heart and the peacemakers. I find nothing wise or comforting in admonitions to be poor of spirit or meek. Be robust of spirit and as assertive as the situation requires. Meekness is not a virtue. Humility, perhaps, but not meekness. That's just a poverty of spirit.
Because it doesn't seem that you understand. Poor in spirit are those who are humble. Those that mourn are those who suffer from injustices and heartbreak and betrayal. Nothing wrong with being merciful. Nothing wrong with hungering and thirsting for righteousness. Also nothing wrong with being pure in heart and being a peacemaker. Meekness is: enduring injury with patience and without resentment, slow to anger, non violent in nature. Poverty of spirit would be extreme but one usually must suffer something and exhibit patience and resilience in order to show meekness. So the spirit is afflicted and suffers but not impoverished.

Continued....
Here For Now

Lenoir City, TN

#478352 Jan 18, 2013
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi HFN.
I keep forgetting that this thread has become a pulpit for some
of topix's most rabid wanna be christian preachers..
Everytime I look in here, I wonder how we could ever take
it back? I know we never will though..
Has been a long time, my friend..Miss you and hope you are well.
Hey Le Le,
It has been a long time. I miss reading your posts. I’m good and hope the same for you. I’m not here as much either. Too much nonsense, fighting and disrespect goes on in here. Plus too many sock puppets. I do a lot of scrolling. Oh well, God knew about it before we did.

It is good to see you when we are both in here at the same time! Yes, friends for quite awhile now.:)
HFN

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Fort Hood Anti-Muslim Backlash Immediate (Nov '09) 2 min falsefaiths 11,286
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min PadMark 679,398
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 11 min Aura Mytha 119,383
Satin is my god (Mar '08) 26 min Trump Worshiper 2,228
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 53 min Tm Cln 2,902
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Born Again past JW 46,226
How To UNBRAINWASH A Liberal 2 hr Stiggy 1
More from around the web