Your arguement was based on the ABSENCE of mentioning the Temple destruction:<quoted text>
See Senecus' post in reference to the above. It is impossible to measure what is not there.
"One of the main evidences for this is that the destruction is not mentioned or alluded to in Revelation."
Your arguement was faulty, Senecus' was not.
You were in error. I pointed it out and you are unable to admit. Such a fragile ego you have.