Why Should Jesus Love Me?

“Romans 8:1.”

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#474221 Jan 2, 2013
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah..You are still hammering nails into His hands with your non-beleif in Him. You claim to believe Him and then turn around and say it is still up to YOU to finish the job that Jesus already finished.
Crazy isn't it?

God's Word clearly says Jesus Christ is the author and finisher of our faith.

Hebrews 12:2.

2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Sadly Lawest has more than proven he doesn't believe that. Lawest thinks he's the finisher his faith. And that he can save himself with his own works if he loses the salvation that he had nothing to do with attaining in the first place.

Talk about some crazy thinking. It just proves how badly he's been deceived by satan.

Sad, truly sad.

“Messenger w/ a Message”

Since: Sep 07

planet earth, for now

#474222 Jan 2, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> True, do you care to join us?
She's already there, Scott. And remarks like this one ^^ are truly not the work of Christ.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#474223 Jan 2, 2013
"While virtually all scholars maintain that all of the gospels were written in the first century, within liberal scholarship it is conventionally thought that all four gospels were written post-70AD"

http://www.crossexamined.org/blog/...
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474224 Jan 2, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
Hold it I'm confused..........
That's old news.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#474225 Jan 2, 2013
"Luke – Most scholars argue 80–90 AD; some scholars 60-65 AD; a minority 37–41 AD

Matthew – Most scholars argue 70–100 AD; a minority argue for dates as early as 63 AD

Because Mark’s gospel is generally believed to have been written earlier than both of these gospels, scholars are generally agreed on a dating of Mark as between 65 AD – 72 AD."

http://www.whitedovebooks.co.uk/blog/2011/01/...
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474226 Jan 2, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> And again..........stop LYING on people, crook.
First there was Jimmy Swaggert,then there was Jim Bakker,then there was....Bible Thumper...and now it's YOU. You've lost your respect here,Lawless. So you need to either LEAVE,or hide behind a changed moniker like a coward.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#474227 Jan 2, 2013
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>
I just dont believe that we can be obedient to earn salvation and keep it.thats all.
It is not like salvation is acheived at 1000 points and every good deed we do is worth a point. Something like that would be earning our salvation imo. Do you think repenting or faith is earning your way to salvation? Then why should obedience be any different? God has not hidden from us who He will save and why. And while none of us deserve to be saved he says those that repent, believe, and obey he will save. I am all for focusing on the positive. Just trying to get the point across there is a reason everyone isnt saved. And just like we must repent and have faith, we must obey. We cant earn something we r not worthy of but God says do these things and He will save us despite not being worthy. sinning is disobeying. So why would it be the devil that makes us feel bad 4 disobeying God? Can we agree a believer ought to repent when he disobeys even if it doesnt affect salvation?

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#474228 Jan 2, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> And again..........stop LYING on people, crook.
Easy Lawest, Thats the good Lord god working through her, jus trying to get you to see the error of your ways.........

I got it on good authority (Red) that God works through sarcasm and mockery..........

All hail God!!!!!!!!!!
God is Good!!!!!!!!!!

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#474229 Jan 2, 2013
Doctor REALITY wrote:
<quoted text>That's old news.
Just for anyone who wasnt paying attention..........

“Romans 8:1.”

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#474230 Jan 2, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> As a sunday school teacher you try to preach on this thread which as a woman is not your place to do at all.
Wow, there it is. The real Lawest exposed for all to see.

What's next, are you going to tell her she should be wearing a burqa and that she doesn't have the right to vote.

You're right back to where you were when you told Judy that she was living in sin because she was married to her second husband.

You're a real piece of work Lawest. I guess we all knew it was just a matter of time till the real you would surface again.

You're doing your father of lies satan proud Lawest.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#474231 Jan 2, 2013
There are two options short of an alternate interpretation that nobody who believes OSAS has offered. Jesus said to have eternal life we must obey the commandments. Somewhere along the line it was decided we dont have to do that. The only two options are the teachings of Jesus dont apply to the Gentiles despite the fact Jesus told us the Father will send us the Holy Spirit to remind us what He (Jesus) taught which would not be the case if his teachings dont apply today or they do apply and we have to do what Jesus taught us. Does someone have another interpretation for all the verses where Jesus says we must obey him to remain in his love and to have eternal life? How can man just decide they dont have to do what Jesus specifically told us we have to do? I am willing to listen to other interpretations with an open mind if someone has any. But if ppl dont have other interpretations, how do they justify not following what Jesus said we must do? I am asking sincerely
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474232 Jan 2, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
hi be beloved dr Reality chief of indians apache names klap pue stinking wing
how are you
dr shrink just now land on the ground of not country 9called usa with a lot of stupid residents)
his visit was far wast areas of orion planets, assembling farts for all those stupid residents,
sine you are good and smart boy, dr Shrink in new year 2013 brought for you nice free gift,
small sugar ball look like bird male ball,but sweet like pampolou moon shine made from havaian root
have good day,of course if this day is good for you anyway
You too,my Doctor Jekyl-Mr, Hyde brother.

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#474233 Jan 2, 2013
Drew H wrote:
<quoted text>
She's already there, Scott. And remarks like this one ^^ are truly not the work of Christ.
Just out of curiosity Drew, are remarks like the following the works of Christ? I'm trying to understand how this works..........
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>
(y)
LOL..There he goes again..Self wont get out of his way so Jesus can come in..ALL he focuses on is HISSELF..Self-righteous pharisee. I guess Jesus just isnt enough for the poor religious nut.
Red Apples wrote:
<quoted text>
<<<Rolls eyes
Wow, can you be anymore lost?

_______
Now wonder you're so lost Lawest.
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474234 Jan 2, 2013
Dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
nibulo
what did you drink today?
it look like post is written be very badly drank poor creature

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#474235 Jan 2, 2013
The use of the destruction of the Temple as an indicarot od date of quthorship is only useful by its presence not absence.

For example using the absense of mention criteria one must believe that Abraham Lincoln wrote before the American Revolution because he never mentions the destruction of the White House by the British in the War of 1812.

Now the presense of the destruction of the Temple proves that the documents were written after 70 AD.

The inclusion of alleged prophecies concerning the "future destruction of the Temple" in the view of rational and unbiased historians is more likely to be proof os ex postfacto "prophecies" and that there inclusion shows that they were were written AFTER 70 AD. Until said "prophecies" are proven to be a fact they are useless for dating purposes.

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#474236 Jan 2, 2013
Drew H wrote:
<quoted text>
She's already there, Scott. And remarks like this one ^^ are truly not the work of Christ.
By the way drew.......Check out that fancy 'y' surounded by parenthesis that Grace is dawning in that post..........

What do you suppose that is?

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#474237 Jan 2, 2013
Red Apples wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, there it is. The real Lawest exposed for all to see.
What's next, are you going to tell her she should be wearing a burqa and that she doesn't have the right to vote.
You're right back to where you were when you told Judy that she was living in sin because she was married to her second husband.
You're a real piece of work Lawest. I guess we all knew it was just a matter of time till the real you would surface again.
You're doing your father of lies satan proud Lawest.
Said one mysoginist to the next..........
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474238 Jan 2, 2013
Grace Walker wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah..You are still hammering nails into His hands with your non-beleif in Him. You claim to believe Him and then turn around and say it is still up to YOU to finish the job that Jesus already finished.
Hello,Mrs.Grace. You doin' o.k. today??
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

#474239 Jan 2, 2013
I LIKE talkin' to 'invisible mutes'!:)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#474240 Jan 2, 2013
Edit Grace...responding here for space. I dont know where you get the warped idea that maintaining that we must follow the teachings of Christ and that we have to obey Christ is putting the focus on myself? And how is someone who claims the teachings of Christ dont apply to us putting the focus on Christ? Jesus said we have to obey him. You think he was talking to someone else and that doesnt apply to you. I will leave it at that if you answer one question. I know you ignore scripture and respond with commentaries but I want YOUR answer on this. If the teachings of Christ dont apply to us then why did Jesus say the Holy Spirit is given to us in part to remind us what he taught? Quite frankly imo you are proving why the reminder is necessary but please answer that one question. Why remind us of teachings that never applied to us and no longer apply at all?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min River Tam 974,883
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min Neville Thompson 658,996
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 14 min River Tam 71,217
Israel End is Near (Feb '15) 21 min Neville Thompson 787
Lido Theater, Dallas (Mar '12) 29 min Whatever88 432
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 35 min Aussie Kev 3,054
News Reason to cringe: Female voters react to Trump 1 hr Fit2Serve 299
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 3 hr Johnny 5,102
More from around the web