1. They took it out of context, didn't know the Jewish meaning of them and used a poor Greek translation instead of the Hebrew.<quoted text>In my post, I mentioned how that the authors of some of our "New Testament" texts quoted from Genesis 15.
Additionally, the accounts by these authors are, indeed, accurate and profitable.
The above account wouldn't serve to prove the point I was making. Genesis 22, on the other hand, would.
Why such a general accusation?.....
2. They are innacurate, flawed and of limited use.
3. Genesis 22 was include in in my comment.
4. Because it is true. Most don;t even read the Bible for inspired illumination. They simply accept Paul's opinion as truth, even when it contradicts Jesus or the Hebrew Scriptures.