General Sherman

Saint Louis, MO

#76779 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
OBAMA ON GUN BAN:” ABSOLUTELY… THERE WILL BE RESISTANCE,”
I GUARANTEE IT.
Any attempt by this administration and an inept and disconnected congress to limit firearms rights of the vast 100 million owners will result in the fragmentation of our Republic.
Obama is quoted saying,”It is not enough for us to say,`This is too hard so we’re not going to try,’” Obama said.“So what I intend to do is I will call all the stakeholders together. I will meet with Republicans. I will meet with Democrats. I will talk to anybody.”
Noticeably, he left out “We The People”.
As for his statement that,“I will talk to anybody”, I’d like to know exactly how our ephemeral dictator intends to hear from the vast number of “Stakeholders” and lawful gun owners who disagree with his position. The congress has not represented them for decades, so exactly how, Mr. President, do you expect to get their input?
“I am not going to prejudge the recommendations that are given to me. I am skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in schools. And I think the vast majority of the American people are skeptical that that somehow is going to solve our problem,” said the president.
Obama said that he expected even firearm owners to understand the need for new regulations in the wake of the Connecticut shooting.
“I think there are a vast majority of responsible gun owners out there who recognize that we can’t have a situation in which somebody with severe psychological problems is able to get the kind of high capacity weapons that this individual in Newtown obtained and gun down our kids,” said Obama.
Well Mr. President I strongly suggest that you look at mental health first. Second, you might want to review your, and past administrations policies on family, societal values, religious freedoms and the overall damage that has been done to the ‘fabric’ of the American society by a small minority of ideologues.
Then, perhaps before the ‘kettle’ calls the ‘pot’ black, you may want to investigate the Fast & Furious debacle in your own administration.
MORE: http://americasvoicenow.org/obama-on-gun-ban-...
Big talk from a loser hillbilly that uses a corncob for toilet paper...your a loser...youv'e always been a loser...your people where losers(they did lose the Civil War) and now your Conservative agenda is in flames like teh Confederacy was...I can't tos ee drones blow the hell out of West Plains

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76780 Feb 17, 2013
good grief wrote:
<quoted text>
Dawg plagiarism shows you know nothing. Here is the link you got the dental crown information from. LOL. What a joke you are.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-289680004...
ROLF ONCE MORE! I just looked at your link. You can't even Google correctly, it turns out! I should not have given you the benefit of the doubt. What a joke YOU are! Can't you do ANYTHING right?

This link is where I got the dental crown information:

http://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/Dental-Crown....

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76781 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
MEET ARGUS: THE WORLD’S HIGHEST RESOLUTION VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PLATFORM
The most interesting this about this creepy camera brought to you by the kind folks at the Defense Advance d Research Projects Agency (DARPA), is the fact that just like in George Orwell’s classic dystopic novel 1984, the government wants you to know they have this technology. From ExtremeTech:
DARPA and the US Army have taken the wraps off ARGUS-IS, a 1.8-gigapixel video surveillance platform that can resolve details as small as six inches from an altitude of 20,000 feet (6km). ARGUS is by far the highest-resolution surveillance platform in the world, and probably the highest-resolution camera in the world, period.
ARGUS, which would be attached to some kind of unmanned UAV (such as the Predator) and flown at an altitude of around 20,000 feet, can observe an area of 25 square kilometers (10sqmi) at any one time. If ARGUS was hovering over New York City, it could observe half of Manhattan. Two ARGUS-equipped drones, and the US could keep an eye on the entirety of Manhattan, 24/7....
Yeah. With two ARGUS-equipped drones, the news channels could really keep an eye on automobile traffic in Manhattan 24/7! WOW! Mayor Bloomberg should run right out and buy two (or four) of these drones right away! Speeders beware!_8-)

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76782 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
OBAMA ON GUN BAN:” ABSOLUTELY… THERE WILL BE RESISTANCE,”
I GUARANTEE IT.
Any attempt by this administration and an inept and disconnected congress to limit firearms rights of the vast 100 million owners will result in the fragmentation of our Republic.
Obama is quoted saying,”It is not enough for us to say,`This is too hard so we’re not going to try,’” Obama said.“So what I intend to do is I will call all the stakeholders together. I will meet with Republicans. I will meet with Democrats. I will talk to anybody.”
Noticeably, he left out “We The People”....
So you are saying that Republicans and Democrats are not "We The People"?
good grief

Houston, MO

#76783 Feb 17, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
ROLF ONCE MORE! I just looked at your link. You can't even Google correctly, it turns out! I should not have given you the benefit of the doubt. What a joke YOU are! Can't you do ANYTHING right?
This link is where I got the dental crown information:
http://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/Dental-Crown....
I guess you didn't read the last few sentences in that first paragraph. Oh I forgot you can't read well nor spell without spell check. And like you google is a joke, "Bing" it.
zack

Mountain Home, AR

#76784 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
OBAMA ON GUN BAN:” ABSOLUTELY… THERE WILL BE RESISTANCE,”

I GUARANTEE IT.

Any attempt by this administration and an inept and disconnected congress to limit firearms rights of the vast 100 million owners will result in the fragmentation of our Republic.

Obama is quoted saying,”It is not enough for us to say,`This is too hard so we’re not going to try,’” Obama said.“So what I intend to do is I will call all the stakeholders together. I will meet with Republicans. I will meet with Democrats. I will talk to anybody.”

Noticeably, he left out “We The People”.

As for his statement that,“I will talk to anybody”, I’d like to know exactly how our ephemeral dictator intends to hear from the vast number of “Stakeholders” and lawful gun owners who disagree with his position. The congress has not represented them for decades, so exactly how, Mr. President, do you expect to get their input?

“I am not going to prejudge the recommendations that are given to me. I am skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in schools. And I think the vast majority of the American people are skeptical that that somehow is going to solve our problem,” said the president.

Obama said that he expected even firearm owners to understand the need for new regulations in the wake of the Connecticut shooting.

“I think there are a vast majority of responsible gun owners out there who recognize that we can’t have a situation in which somebody with severe psychological problems is able to get the kind of high capacity weapons that this individual in Newtown obtained and gun down our kids,” said Obama.

Well Mr. President I strongly suggest that you look at mental health first. Second, you might want to review your, and past administrations policies on family, societal values, religious freedoms and the overall damage that has been done to the ‘fabric’ of the American society by a small minority of ideologues.

Then, perhaps before the ‘kettle’ calls the ‘pot’ black, you may want to investigate the Fast & Furious debacle in your own administration.

MORE: http://americasvoicenow.org/obama-on-gun-ban-...
There will also be jail cells for you
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#76785 Feb 17, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"Norton," I was just beginning to believe that you had been "Raptured" by that meteorite which hit Russia Thursday. Did you see all the destruction?
It has been proved that the biblical cities of Sodom and Gomorrah (and other nearby cities) were destroyed by a similar, but more powerful, meteorite which struck the earth in 3121 BC. You have to believe this -- it was reported by your favorite source of information: "Fox News."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,343674,00...
Yeah, I believe God was in control of Sodom and Gomorrah just like he is now. So you better watch out or you may find a meteorite falling down on your head.

Fox News is certainly my favorite source of information because they search for the truth!

Been off here for a while but it's just like a soap opera.......same old BS.........and a few people that have some common sense, but that doesn't include you.

You're stuck on stupid!

President going to Israel! Big deal! I suspect he is not going for the right reasons.

Hey Dawg, FYI there will be a lot of those meteorites during the Trib!

CHEERS!
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76787 Feb 18, 2013
zack wrote:
<quoted text>
There will also be jail cells for you
GREAT Post ...Game Point
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76788 Feb 18, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I believe God was in control of Sodom and Gomorrah just like he is now. So you better watch out or you may find a meteorite falling down on your head.
Fox News is certainly my favorite source of information because they search for the truth!
Been off here for a while but it's just like a soap opera.......same old BS.........and a few people that have some common sense, but that doesn't include you.
You're stuck on stupid!
President going to Israel! Big deal! I suspect he is not going for the right reasons.
Hey Dawg, FYI there will be a lot of those meteorites during the Trib!
CHEERS!
WE Knew that you hadn't been RAPTURED...that will never happen...

most likely you hadn't paid your internet provider
CHEERS
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76789 Feb 18, 2013
good grief wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess you didn't read the last few sentences in that first paragraph. Oh I forgot you can't read well nor spell without spell check. And like you google is a joke, "Bing" it.
Funny name where you post from...hahahahaha
Instead of "Licking" you should be posting from "Sucking"...
because you do!

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#76790 Feb 18, 2013
Have you noticed these dullards on this thread, when they run out of Valley Girl insults, they instead abuse us with their 'emoticon voting' for 'racy, clueless, and off topic'. It's akin to masturbating with a condom.

Cute, sad, and pedestrian.

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#76791 Feb 18, 2013
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny name where you post from...hahahahaha
Instead of "Licking" you should be posting from "Sucking"...
because you do!
I most often read your responses and think: This guy actually thinks that his childish third grade insults are witty.

Just go back to giving out cootie shots ad infinitum, making armpit noises, and generally laughing at yourself when you pass gas in a very animated and auditory tone.

I already told you that you're a simpleton, and you need not traverse the path to complexity beyond your obvious limitations. To do so would be akin to feeding a dog sirloin medium rare, with a side-dish of boiled mushrooms. Neither of you could ever appreciate the subtleties of the portions presented.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76792 Feb 18, 2013
good grief wrote:
<quoted text>I guess you didn't read the last few sentences in that first paragraph. Oh I forgot you can't read well nor spell without spell check. And like you google is a joke, "Bing" it.
So let me get this straight, sweetheart! If I get background information from any Internet source, you think that I must provide that source or a link?

You may not realize it, but Topix is not an academic forum, nor is there any law which requires everyone to cite sources for every sentence.

You are pedantic, but, since these days you have no authority, it makes no difference. Except to those with whom you make contact and viciously attack for no good reason except because of your own hatred.

I have figured it out. Over the years, you and "good grief" have grown apart and now you dislike if not actually hate each other. Since it is counterproductive to attack each other, you two have to go out looking for other places to vent that hatred. Maybe you two should:

1. Go to a marriage counselor?
2. Just declare the marriage a long-term failure and separate or get divorced?

I am just trying to be helpful here. These are my own thoughts, so do not expect a link to them (other than the address to this comment).

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76793 Feb 18, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I believe God was in control of Sodom and Gomorrah just like he is now. So you better watch out or you may find a meteorite falling down on your head.
Fox News is certainly my favorite source of information because they search for the truth!
Been off here for a while but it's just like a soap opera....... same old BS......... and a few people that have some common sense, but that doesn't include you.
You're stuck on stupid!
President going to Israel! Big deal! I suspect he is not going for the right reasons.
Hey Dawg, FYI there will be a lot of those meteorites during the Trib!...
1. God still controls Sodom and Gomorrah? Do tell!
2. "Fox News" doesn't do a very good job of "searching for the truth." They are biased to "search" for news which they can spin to appeal to their conservative watchers. That's just business for them.
3. "Norton," you are not cleared to know the reasons that President Obama is going to Israel. You get upset when President Obama does not go to Israel. You get upset when President Obama does go to Israel. Do we see a pattern here?
4. I predict there will be meteorites and earthquakes and tornadoes and tsunamis and snow and rain and wars and rumors of wars regardless of "the Trib." If you were to take off your black opaque glasses, you would be more aware of what is really going on. Of course, you might have a sensory overload when faced with reality, so perhaps you should remain just as you are.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76794 Feb 18, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
Have you noticed these dullards on this thread, when they run out of Valley Girl insults, they instead abuse us with their 'emoticon voting' for 'racy, clueless, and off topic'. It's akin to masturbating with a condom.
Cute, sad, and pedestrian.
Hey, we can't help it that you are clueless, nuts, and spamming.

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#76795 Feb 18, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
So let me get this straight, sweetheart! If I get background information from any Internet source, you think that I must provide that source or a link?
You may not realize it, but Topix is not an academic forum, nor is there any law which requires everyone to cite sources for every sentence.
You are pedantic, but, since these days you have no authority, it makes no difference. Except to those with whom you make contact and viciously attack for no good reason except because of your own hatred.
I have figured it out. Over the years, you and "good grief" have grown apart and now you dislike if not actually hate each other. Since it is counterproductive to attack each other, you two have to go out looking for other places to vent that hatred. Maybe you two should:
1. Go to a marriage counselor?
2. Just declare the marriage a long-term failure and separate or get divorced?
I am just trying to be helpful here. These are my own thoughts, so do not expect a link to them (other than the address to this comment).
The fact that you use my screen name amongst the subterfuge of yours shows your obsessive nature, if not the psychotic portion of your personality. When everyone here uses my screen name in the same manner, my job will be complete. Thanks!

I am pleased that your grammar improved, yet there's one inherent difficulty when you switch from the simpleton constructs you have used to date, and the grammatically correct version you try so hard to emulate—your errors show up far more easily.

"You are pedantic, but, since these days you have no authority, it makes no difference. Except to those with whom you make contact and viciously attack for no good reason except because of your own hatred."

The latter portion is not a complete sentence, and had you kept posting without making it a separate sentence, you would have abused the run-on sentence rule.

It is rather cute to see you try so hard, though. I am pleased to have made you notice and attempt to improve upon your obvious limitations. Eventually, grammar will come naturally—or you will return to the former 'simpleton constructs'. My money is on the latter.

Even should you correct your grammar disabilities, you will always have difficulty with your reasoning skills. This is why you believe that I live in St. Louis.

'He who assumes is the enemy of exactitude.' It remains true. ;)

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#76796 Feb 18, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, we can't help it that you are clueless, nuts, and spamming.
The fact that you did not bother to read the post shows your very nature far beyond your knock-knock jokes and play-period insults. Keep it up.

I am pleased that you have addressed your most obvious weakness—grammar. When you perfect reasoning, and abolish your obsessive nature with your screen name abuse, then you might be ready for freedom beyond your straight-jacket persona.

Nice work!
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#76797 Feb 18, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
1. God still controls Sodom and Gomorrah? Do tell!
2. "Fox News" doesn't do a very good job of "searching for the truth." They are biased to "search" for news which they can spin to appeal to their conservative watchers. That's just business for them.
3. "Norton," you are not cleared to know the reasons that President Obama is going to Israel. You get upset when President Obama does not go to Israel. You get upset when President Obama does go to Israel. Do we see a pattern here?
4. I predict there will be meteorites and earthquakes and tornadoes and tsunamis and snow and rain and wars and rumors of wars regardless of "the Trib." If you were to take off your black opaque glasses, you would be more aware of what is really going on. Of course, you might have a sensory overload when faced with reality, so perhaps you should remain just as you are.
I will continue to believe the same! I think Fox is the best in news coverage. I don't trust Obama! I believe God is in control! I guarantee you there will be more meteorites, earthquakes, etc.....because the Bible says so. One more thing....most of the other news media are LIBERALS. Now who is really biased? They don't report a lot of things that they think will hurt their cause. You know that is true but you won't admit it for anything.

CHEERS!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76798 Feb 18, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text> ... "You are pedantic, but, since these days you have no authority, it makes no difference. Except to those with whom you make contact and viciously attack for no good reason except because of your own hatred."
The latter portion is not a complete sentence, and had you kept posting without making it a separate sentence, you would have abused the run-on sentence rule....
Oh, I do so dislike abusing the "run-on sentence rule." Keep displaying your pedantic self. And if you think that anyone cares -- we don't!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76799 Feb 18, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that you did not bother to read the post shows your very nature far beyond your knock-knock jokes and play-period insults. Keep it up.
I am pleased that you have addressed your most obvious weakness—grammar. When you perfect reasoning, and abolish your obsessive nature with your screen name abuse, then you might be ready for freedom beyond your straight-jacket persona.
Nice work!
ROFL! "straight-jacket" Ah, hahahahahahaha! Personally, I always try to keep my jacket straight!_8-)

You do not have much of a command of the language, do you?

Your post merely shows that I am really getting to you -- which is my goal. Good to see that I am succeeding superbly!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 6 min Le Duped 168,564
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 6 min Yes it is me 68,849
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana... (Oct '10) 9 min Not Landrieu 4,551
OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 2 hr You big dummy 80,887
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 3 hr Old Guy 34,730
Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... 4 hr Julia 3,374
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 5 hr Cbutt 59,863
More from around the web