Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19771 Jul 15, 2013
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
What isn't funny is your ignorance and your obsession with tea bagging. Like I said before, too bad you don't have a set of balls so that you could teabag.
Your party came up with the term "teabagging" not us, not our fault your party was behind "teabagging" until you found out the double meaning of the word, that is the fault of the idiots you listen to, whine at them not us.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19772 Jul 15, 2013
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
These losers don't have an area of expertise, unless you count ignorance and being a dumb ass as expertise.
This being said by one of the biggest idiots on this thread. You got no room to talk, tard.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19773 Jul 15, 2013
InSummary wrote:
Scumdog and Creepy, your talents are needed on the Peter Puffer thread. Might as well move along to your areas of expertise.
Ok you are muttering about a Welch thread, I am not on the Welch board I am lurking in Beckley and other places for the time being, grow a pair and deal with it yourself, I am busy.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19775 Jul 15, 2013
Say it aint so wrote:
<quoted text>
LIAR, EFFING LIAR.
The teabag movement, as your people invented, was created on tax day 2009 in response to a newly elected president who happens to be black. Google this goofball on fox named Griff Jenkins and his "teabag the white house" schtick before it embarrassed the GOP. It brought a bunch of dumb toothless hicks together espousing stupidity, that is for sure.
bb

Belle, WV

#19776 Jul 15, 2013
I support Joe!!!!

“Our founders”

Since: May 13

NEVER COMPLIED

#19777 Jul 15, 2013
Say it aint so wrote:
<quoted text>
LIAR, EFFING LIAR.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_move...

Under "symbols and terms" it describes how these dumbasses called themselves tea baggers. More facts to get in the way of their hilarious manufactured reality. They are funny though.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19778 Jul 15, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_move...
Under "symbols and terms" it describes how these dumbasses called themselves tea baggers. More facts to get in the way of their hilarious manufactured reality. They are funny though.
Sounds like the teabaggers adopted Zimmerman as their mascot to drool over.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Melbourne, Australia

#19779 Jul 15, 2013
Why, do you need a new one to puff on?
InSummary wrote:
Scumdog and Creepy, your talents are needed on the Peter Puffer thread. Might as well move along to your areas of expertise.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Melbourne, Australia

#19780 Jul 15, 2013
He has a set of them. Problem is, they are on your chin most of the time.
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
What isn't funny is your ignorance and your obsession with tea bagging. Like I said before, too bad you don't have a set of balls so that you could teabag.

“Our founders”

Since: May 13

NEVER COMPLIED

#19781 Jul 15, 2013
Weepy wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like the teabaggers adopted Zimmerman as their mascot to drool over.
Too bad they didn't actually watch any of the trial or they would've realized they portrayed him as he is - the biggest p_ssy ever. Just like all the other gunnuts. P_ssies scared of EVERYTHING.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Melbourne, Australia

#19782 Jul 15, 2013
Oh that's deep.

How long did it take you to come up with that one...or does talent like that just come natural in Fairymont?
Say it aint so wrote:
<quoted text>
LIAR, EFFING LIAR.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Melbourne, Australia

#19783 Jul 15, 2013
Because if she does, that makes you the expert, Squirt.
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
These losers don't have an area of expertise, unless you count ignorance and being a dumb ass as expertise.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Melbourne, Australia

#19784 Jul 15, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad they didn't actually watch any of the trial or they would've realized they portrayed him as he is - the biggest p_ssy ever. Just like all the other gunnuts. P_ssies scared of EVERYTHING.
You know, that's funny. I didn't watch much of the trial because I really wasn't that interested, but I do have to admit that I did find it odd that Zimmerman had a gun and was getting beat up by a kid for Christ sakes. LOL. He's not going to fair all that well out in the real world now that the trial is over, that's for sure.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#19785 Jul 15, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad they didn't actually watch any of the trial or they would've realized they portrayed him as he is - the biggest p_ssy ever. Just like all the other gunnuts. P_ssies scared of EVERYTHING.
Someone just told me one of the jurors was on CNN and claimed it took 3 votes to come up with a not guilty verdict as the first two were deadlocked and took awhile to convince the others to vote guilty, half of them was certain he was guilty. the lady on CNN did not come off as too bright.
Arthur

United States

#19787 Jul 15, 2013
The jury initially had three votes for not guilty, two votes for manslaughter and one vote for second-degree murder when deliberations began, juror B-37 told CNN on Monday.

"There was a couple of them in there that wanted to find him guilty of something. And after hours and hours and hours of deliberating over the law, and reading it over and over and over again, we just decided there's no other way or place to go," she told CNN.

Now we got the Attorney General who of all people should be defending the legal system and promoting respect forthe juries verdict running his piehole trying to start riots. But I guess respecting the law isnt this administrations strong suit, is it. LOL
Well Duh

Ashburn, VA

#19788 Jul 15, 2013
You better write you represenatives and tell them they better stop the nutty Harry Ried. He is opening up pandoras box by wanting a nuclear vote. He feels he will not be in long enough to feel the effects when there will be a time when the other party will hold the senete. Then the democrats will be doing the crying. I really do not think this is a road we as a country want to go down. Just like the Patriot Act, there is too much potential for abuse by either side.
Well Duh

Ashburn, VA

#19789 Jul 15, 2013
Eric Holder is a poor excuse for attorney general. He now wants to possibly bring new charges and investigation on Zimmerman. This is the same man who did not investigate the two black panthers who brought clubs to a voters poll as intimidation. He did not do anything for the agent who was killed by his fast and furious program. He went after two boarder agents that was fired on by illegal aliens and they defended themselves and was put in jail. Another idiot incharge. Holder has to prove intent. Zimmerman took a black girl to his senior prom, he was a mentor to black kids in his community and when the funds ran out he still mentored the kids. He was raiswd and took care of underprivledged black kids. These are facts, so look that up. So where is his racial intent? I am sorry a 17 year old died. But Trayvon was in trouble with a record of having stolen merchandise and was suspended for having burglary tools in his locker. Plus the toxicology showed he was on drugs when this occurred. These are also facts that the prosecutor stalled and did not want to hand over the evidence and is going to be up on charges. There are no winners here and people are going crazy over this.
Petro

Nitro, WV

#19790 Jul 15, 2013
Amen too your topix Well Duh.
Arthur

United States

#19791 Jul 15, 2013
Well Duh wrote:
You better write you represenatives and tell them they better stop the nutty Harry Ried. He is opening up pandoras box by wanting a nuclear vote. He feels he will not be in long enough to feel the effects when there will be a time when the other party will hold the senete. Then the democrats will be doing the crying. I really do not think this is a road we as a country want to go down. Just like the Patriot Act, there is too much potential for abuse by either side.
Not sure he has a choice. The Republicans are basically demanding they get to pick the nominees. I guess they dont understand they lost the election and the mighty Obama gets to pick, not them. More Republican obstructionism to the point of forcing the nuke option. Obama won and he gets to pick.
Arthur

United States

#19792 Jul 15, 2013
He won and He gets to pick, and also He dont need no stinkin waiver, he is the mighty Obama! LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 1 hr Serendipity412 126,547
Election Who's got your vote for Congress in Missouri's ... (Oct '14) 17 hr SadLife 16
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York ... (Oct '10) Sat danl17 6,332
Election Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) Jun 13 Trump 35,555
Election Who are you voting for in the Michigan Governor... (Oct '14) Jun 12 DEVOSTERRORISM 31
Election Paul vs Conway: The Nastiest Debate Of 2010 | T... (Oct '10) Jun 12 Humberto Pinedo M... 16,229
Election Who's got your vote for Congress in Tennessee's... (Nov '14) Jun 11 Guest 53