“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15366 May 22, 2013
No, that's bullshyt and you know it. You absolutely know it. South Carolina REPUBLICANS voted him back in. The key word is REPUBLICANS. They voted him in to represent them in Washington. The RNC didn't pull the plug on him UNTIL he was charged with trespassing on his ex-wife's property. But REPUBLICANS in South Carolina STILL elected him. That's the height of hypocrisy.
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
The party did not vote Mark Sanford back in. The idiots from S. Carolina did. The great citizens from NY are getting ready to vote whiner Wiener back in office. So there is idiots on both sides of the aisle.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15367 May 22, 2013
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
The party did not vote Mark Sanford back in. The idiots from S. Carolina did. The great citizens from NY are getting ready to vote whiner Wiener back in office. So there is idiots on both sides of the aisle.
Well hell yes, why wouldn't Wiener run for office? I mean if your party can elect an adulterer who used state tax money to finance a trip to Argentina, why can't someone who took pictures of his Crowley and sent it to someone run for mayor of NYC?

By the way, the "liberal media" is trashing Wiener even as we speak.
bacon hater

Pittsburgh, PA

#15368 May 22, 2013
Ha ha. Took pictures of his "Crowley." Classic. What an idiot.
bushman

Charleston, WV

#15369 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>Ahhhh....so because YOU didn't see them, they don't exist. Is that what you are saying?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the...

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But, using your "logic" (LOLOLOLOL) I guess we can all let Clinton off the hook for his Lewenski scandal since none of us ever saw her playing tonsil hockey with Bill's....ummmm...stick.
No but we saw the dress. Lolololplol.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15370 May 22, 2013
Who cares? Yeah, the president got a BJ. Big deal. More power to him.

But your party made a big deal out of it and then they turned around and elected an adulterer who lied about his whereabouts, spent state money to finance his trip to Argentina, committed adultery, trespassed on his wife's party and then....your party elected him..LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Now, come on. Lecture us on morals again, will you?
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
No but we saw the dress. Lolololplol.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15371 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Ha ha. Took pictures of his "Crowley." Classic. What an idiot.
It would have been better if Wiener had been a woman and taken a picture of his "Crowley" because that would have been much more fitting of the name.

;)
bacon hater

Pittsburgh, PA

#15372 May 22, 2013
Yeah but that's just proof that women WANT to blow our leaders. Yours tap their feet in bathrooms.

What's up with the scandals? Still not a single link to Obama? Nothing to tie in Clinton? Not even an accuser? This is what you get when you let tea baggers speak. You look like idiots. I just hope they don't fall into obscurity. We need to watch these losers choke on this shit. Demand apologies. Publicize the tea baggers who pretended they saw emails. But just like WMDs in Iraq, most tea baggers will think it's real. Just like most think Noah's Ark ACTUALLY F_CKING HAPPENED. It'd be depressing if it wasn't so hysterical.
bushman

Charleston, WV

#15373 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>No, that's bullshyt and you know it. You absolutely know it. South Carolina REPUBLICANS voted him back in. The key word is REPUBLICANS. They voted him in to represent them in Washington. The RNC didn't pull the plug on him UNTIL he was charged with trespassing on his ex-wife's property. But REPUBLICANS in South Carolina STILL elected him. That's the height of hypocrisy.
What about whiny Wiener?

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15374 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Yeah but that's just proof that women WANT to blow our leaders. Yours tap their feet in bathrooms.
What's up with the scandals? Still not a single link to Obama? Nothing to tie in Clinton? Not even an accuser? This is what you get when you let tea baggers speak. You look like idiots. I just hope they don't fall into obscurity. We need to watch these losers choke on this shit. Demand apologies. Publicize the tea baggers who pretended they saw emails. But just like WMDs in Iraq, most tea baggers will think it's real. Just like most think Noah's Ark ACTUALLY F_CKING HAPPENED. It'd be depressing if it wasn't so hysterical.
Poor republicans. If they weren't so worthless, I would feel sorry for them.

Fact is, despite all of their best efforts, they

a.) can't connect any of this to Obama.
b.) can't deny their own involvement in similar scandals during previous administrations (I would have said Bush, but that makes them shyt themselves).
c.) can't deny the fact that throughout all of this, the net result has been that Obama's approval has gone up.
d.)can't deny that the approval of their own party has gone down.

They just can't learn that this tactic is not working. 5 years of the same mindless bullshyt and the end result is that O gets re-elected and his popularity goes up.

God, this must be frustrating the shyt out of them.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15375 May 22, 2013
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
What about whiny Wiener?
So wait a minute here.

Your party elects Sanford but YOU have a problem with Wiener?

LOLOLOLOLOL...this is rich. Absoeffinglutely rich.

By the way, Wiener hasn't been elected yet. He's just running.

Sanford has been elected.

“Tears of a Clown”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#15376 May 22, 2013
The type of comedy that GOP likes is the types that are discriminatory or an element of hate and is ALWAYS unfunny to a normal thinking human, they also like lame jokes from their leaders such as "hyuk hyuk, nope no WMD's under there, huh huh".

But they give US tons of material.
bushman

Charleston, WV

#15377 May 22, 2013
Sundog512, like I said I am an Independent. I said corruption is on both sides. I denounce both sides of corruption and dirty politics. What I think is upsetting is, where each side sits back and runs there mouth about Clinton done this, Bush done this, Reagan done this, George Washington done this. Who cares what Bush, Clinton, and George Washington done. It is 2013. We can't go back and change what has already happened, but we should be smart enough to prevent present and future screw ups by either party's administration. Why do we keep making the same mistakes over and over by both parties. You complain about Mark Sanford then take up for Wiener. I think Sanford was wrong what he done and Wiener too, but I guess it wasn't enough to disqualify them for running. But the people should be smart enough not to vote for them. It is nobody's fault but the citizens that vote for them. I am consistent in saying that both sides are corrupt and point out what I don't like about either side of the isle. That is why there needs to be new rules in place to prevent corrupt people from even qualifying for office. That would allow for a better quality individuals to choose from when voting. This crap of voting for the less of two evils is just wrong.

“Gods Curse On Lazy Hillbillies”

Since: Jun 12

Dale City, VA

#15378 May 22, 2013
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
And Butt Crack, I would say that the greatest republican accomplishment ever is blocking as much of the socialist agenda of the Chicago crook, liar and gangster, as possible.
Let Me Make Sure That I'm Understanding You Correctly.....

According To {You}....The Republicans {Greatest Accomplishments} Have Been {Blocking} Agendas....From The Liberal Side When The Liberals Are In charge and running The White House???.....Are You Saying That The Republicans Only {Impressive Achievements} Have Occurred When They're {NOT} In The White House???....

Over The Last 30 Years....We've Had 20 Of Those Years Of Being Under Republican Leadership.....And In {Those 20 Years} Of Republican Leadership....You're Telling Us That You Can't Think Of {one Thing The Republicans Have Done}...That You Can Hang Your Pride On???....

If What {You} Say Is True....Then The Republicans Don't {Need} To Be The Leaders....Because Based On What {You} Say.....Republicans Preform Better In The Back Ground as {Blockers}....

So What The Hell Are You Bitching About?!?!....Your Side Is In The Position That It Excels At....Blockers!!!!....

Do You Agree???...Or Not Agree???....
bacon hater

Pittsburgh, PA

#15379 May 22, 2013
Wiener will win easy. New York is populated by educated voters. They know that your genitals and skin color don't have any impact on intelligence or ability to lead. The red state voters disagree with this obvious fact, and that's why they lead the country in poverty, teenage pregnancy rates and the number of millionaire religious leaders. By the way, goddamn his wife is hot! Wiener is a firey leader. His congressional speeches where he spanks tea baggers are hilarious. O'Reilly, Hannity and the What The Fox news people won't have him on anymore because they end up over his knee too. What he did to pornstar Megyn Kelly was downright brutal. "Gotta go, Congressman." Ouch.
bushman

Charleston, WV

#15380 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>So wait a minute here.

Your party elects Sanford but YOU have a problem with Wiener?

LOLOLOLOLOL...this is rich. Absoeffinglutely rich.

By the way, Wiener hasn't been elected yet. He's just running.

Sanford has been elected.
It's not my party. I'm not a republican. I said if you would have read my comments. The idiot republicans from SC voted him in. But so did idiot democrats. I party can't elect anyone. But the republicans shouldn't have nominated him in the first place. Then the democrats helped to elect that moron. Now how much do you want to bet that those idiots in NY won't vote foe Wiener.

“Tears of a Clown”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#15381 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Wiener will win easy. New York is populated by educated voters. They know that your genitals and skin color don't have any impact on intelligence or ability to lead. The red state voters disagree with this obvious fact, and that's why they lead the country in poverty, teenage pregnancy rates and the number of millionaire religious leaders. By the way, goddamn his wife is hot! Wiener is a firey leader. His congressional speeches where he spanks tea baggers are hilarious. O'Reilly, Hannity and the What The Fox news people won't have him on anymore because they end up over his knee too. What he did to pornstar Megyn Kelly was downright brutal. "Gotta go, Congressman." Ouch.
An he will get TV time, this is why the low level guys who stalked him wantsd off the set, dunno how many times I seen Weiner humiliate fox anchors and hacks like Bachmann and Peter King on air by just speaking the truth. He can win arguments and is used to be shouted down by fox's waterhead commentators before he could finish his sentence and works around it. He would be excellent.
bushman

Charleston, WV

#15382 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Wiener will win easy. New York is populated by educated voters. They know that your genitals and skin color don't have any impact on intelligence or ability to lead. The red state voters disagree with this obvious fact, and that's why they lead the country in poverty, teenage pregnancy rates and the number of millionaire religious leaders. By the way, goddamn his wife is hot! Wiener is a firey leader. His congressional speeches where he spanks tea baggers are hilarious. O'Reilly, Hannity and the What The Fox news people won't have him on anymore because they end up over his knee too. What he did to pornstar Megyn Kelly was downright brutal. "Gotta go, Congressman." Ouch.
Pornstar, Megyn Kelly! What the hell are you talking about?

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15384 May 22, 2013
After all this discussion about Weiner, I went and looked the guy up.

Now I see what the problem is....

Republicans fear the Weiner:

Crowley

Ashburn, VA

#15385 May 22, 2013
--Crack Rabbit-- wrote:
<quoted text>
Let Me Make Sure That I'm Understanding You Correctly.....
According To {You}....The Republicans {Greatest Accomplishments} Have Been {Blocking} Agendas....From The Liberal Side When The Liberals Are In charge and running The White House???.....Are You Saying That The Republicans Only {Impressive Achievements} Have Occurred When They're {NOT} In The White House???....
Over The Last 30 Years....We've Had 20 Of Those Years Of Being Under Republican Leadership.....And In {Those 20 Years} Of Republican Leadership....You're Telling Us That You Can't Think Of {one Thing The Republicans Have Done}...That You Can Hang Your Pride On???....
If What {You} Say Is True....Then The Republicans Don't {Need} To Be The Leaders....Because Based On What {You} Say.....Republicans Preform Better In The Back Ground as {Blockers}....
So What The Hell Are You Bitching About?!?!....Your Side Is In The Position That It Excels At....Blockers!!!!....
Do You Agree???...Or Not Agree???....
I actually agree with you Butt Crack, the country works better when the dumbocrats think they are in charge and republicans actually do the heavy lifting. The only problem is that you stinking, ignorant dumbocrats are so corrupt that it is sometimes hard to keep you under control, i.e. disasters like Obama Care, the current IRS fiasco, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, targeting James Rosen of Fox News, the list goes on.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Corsicana, TX

#15386 May 22, 2013
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not my party. I'm not a republican.
Whether you admit it or not is of little concern to me. Your comments say otherwise.
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>I said if you would have read my comments. The idiot republicans from SC voted him in.
And what special test do you use do distinguish an idiot republican from SC from the rest of the idiot republicans?
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>But so did idiot democrats. I party can't elect anyone.
So now it is democrats fault that Sanford got elected? Please, tell us more.
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>But the republicans shouldn't have nominated him in the first place. Then the democrats helped to elect that moron.
Oh for the love of Jesus Effing Christ on a rubber cross, that is what you are saying. What is it about you ignorant republicans that make it impossible for you to own up to your mistakes. Your party elected Sanford. You own the SOB. Stop trying to blame democrats for that too.
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>Now how much do you want to bet that those idiots in NY won't vote foe Wiener.
Let's be specific. Weiner is running for mayor of NYC. He is not running for the ability to represent the American people in Washington.

Do you even understand the difference?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 11 min -The Artist- 79,561
Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in... (Oct '10) 42 min 123pictures 164,796
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 46 min American Lady 165,510
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 1 hr Yellow Dawg Democrat 99,415
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Car... (Oct '10) 2 hr Cyrus5590 61,556
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana... (Oct '10) 3 hr Not Landrieu 4,413
Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... 3 hr Mechanic_45 1,603
More from around the web