Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
daisy

Lenoir, NC

#39683 Apr 30, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
Where is everybody?Why doesn't anyone answer me?How come no one talks to me?Do I have to make fake monikers again to answer me and talk to?Where are you emlu?Where are you Spoon?Where are you Arnold?Where are you Jeff?Where are you Allen?Where are you Boy George?Where are you waco?HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ....I'm waco!Who am I?Where am I?What am I?I CONTROL THIS POST AND NO ONE WILL GET IN MY WAY NOT EVEN EMLU'S BIG FAT ASS...I AM THE MASTURBATER OF THIS POST... THIS IS MY POST!!!
Maybe if you had something to say worth a crap, someone would talk to you. I didn't think the mentally ill were allowed electronics. I guess since you are familiar with electricity, they deem it OK. Frankly, after skimming your posts, they should shove your PC or "hand held device" up yourass. You would like that too much though.
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39684 Apr 30, 2013
Pelosi's top 10 contributors:
Top 10 Organizations Funding
Contributions
Occidental Petroleum $35,000
Mackenzie Patterson Fuller$14,800
Susman Godfrey Llp $10,500
Wells Fargo $10,250
National Association of Real Estate InvestmentTrusts $10,000,Alza Corporation $10,00United Parcel Service $10,000

Pelosi's "contributors" are small potatoes compaired to Goivernor Pat's gambling "contributors" They are all corrupting influences which should be outlawed with a death penalty.
United Steelworkers

$10,000


Google Incorporated

$10,000


American Association of Nurse Anesthetists

$10,000
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39685 Apr 30, 2013
Now that Charlotte's mayor is being appointed transportation secretary, will Governor McCory and his republikan henchmen have to eat some humble pie on the airport question?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#39686 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Now that Charlotte's mayor is being appointed transportation secretary, will Governor McCory and his republikan henchmen have to eat some humble pie on the airport question?
Not likely, considering it is a state issue, not federal.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39687 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Now that Charlotte's mayor is being appointed transportation secretary, will Governor McCory and his republikan henchmen have to eat some humble pie on the airport question?
If Charlotte appeals to the FAA, which will be controlled by their ersrwhile mayor, the decision will be in Charlottes' favor.
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39688 Apr 30, 2013
Does the transportation secretary not control funds to airports, railroads,automobile roads and ports? An accountant should be able to figure that one out.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Not likely, considering it is a state issue, not federal.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39689 Apr 30, 2013
daisy wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe if you had something to say worth a crap, someone would talk to you. I didn't think the mentally ill were allowed electronics. I guess since you are familiar with electricity, they deem it OK. Frankly, after skimming your posts, they should shove your PC or "hand held device" up yourass. You would like that too much though.
DAISY old girl, you don't have sense enough to tell a fake poster from a real poster? My avatar is there, plain for all to see. No avatar? Not me.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39690 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Does the transportation secretary not control funds to airports, railroads,automobile roads and ports? An accountant should be able to figure that one out.
<quoted text>
In this case, you appear to be correct.An appeal to the FAA will result in a favorable decision for Charlotte, as their former mayor, who is opposed to taking control of the airport from Charlotte, will be the person making the final decision.
Allen

Lenoir, NC

#39691 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Does the transportation secretary not control funds to airports, railroads,automobile roads and ports? An accountant should be able to figure that one out.
<quoted text>
http://www.tcpilots.org/fundin g.html
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39693 Apr 30, 2013
Felonizing breast exposure, cutting out income tax on the rich and replacing that with sales tax on food, stealing airports, taking "contributions" from internet gambling interest, requiring back ground checks for dog owners--- republikans making government more intrusive and more corrupt.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39694 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Felonizing breast exposure, cutting out income tax on the rich and replacing that with sales tax on food, stealing airports, taking "contributions" from internet gambling interest, requiring back ground checks for dog owners--- republikans making government more intrusive and more corrupt.
To be honest, I thought you were fibbing about the dog owner thing.Until, I was informed by a local business owner that they wanted to send people to his house to investigate him, when he tried to adopt a dog.Considering this to be intrusive, he eschewed the adoption.
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39695 Apr 30, 2013
It would be better IF I were , but you just cannot make this stuff up that these republikan idiots are actually doing.. They were elected to create jobs but all they can do is write laws that try to enforce THEIR religion , destroy one of the nation's best educational systems, and give more tax breaks to the rich. Today's Charlotte Observer reports that the total of tax breaks, tax exemptions, subsidies and rebates to select groups amounts to over 1 BILLION dollars annually in North Carolina while working people are hit harder and harder each year for more and more money...
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> To be honest, I thought you were fibbing about the dog owner thing.Until, I was informed by a local business owner that they wanted to send people to his house to investigate him, when he tried to adopt a dog.Considering this to be intrusive, he eschewed the adoption.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#39696 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Now that Charlotte's mayor is being appointed transportation secretary, will Governor McCory and his republikan henchmen have to eat some humble pie on the airport question?
No. That just means Foxx will be able to cover his ass for funneling federal funds from the airport to Clt's local govt in order to pay for local projects because the Commucrats have bankrupted Clt as well as our state for the last 120+ years!
When McCrory takes the airport away, the truth about Foxx and the Commucrats will come out!
I'm sure that Foxx and the Ruler will find a way to blame the Republicans, it all they do!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#39697 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
It would be better IF I were , but you just cannot make this stuff up that these republikan idiots are actually doing.. They were elected to create jobs but all they can do is write laws that try to enforce THEIR religion , destroy one of the nation's best educational systems, and give more tax breaks to the rich. Today's Charlotte Observer reports that the total of tax breaks, tax exemptions, subsidies and rebates to select groups amounts to over 1 BILLION dollars annually in North Carolina while working people are hit harder and harder each year for more and more money...
<quoted text>
I wouldn't expect that liberal rag to report anything but propaganda.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#39698 Apr 30, 2013
TSF wrote:
Felonizing breast exposure, cutting out income tax on the rich and replacing that with sales tax on food, stealing airports, taking "contributions" from internet gambling interest, requiring back ground checks for dog owners--- republikans making government more intrusive and more corrupt.
Felonizing PUBLIC breast exposure, something innocent children shouldn't be exposed to, cutting income tax on ALL EMPLOYEES and replacing it with an increased sales tax, something EVERYONE pays regardless of whether or not they're employed, thus increase tax revenues, taking control of airports so local govts can't funnel federal monies away from there intended purpose and used for pet projects, no different than the Ruler taking contributions from shady organizations, politics 101, some people aren't responsible enough to be dog owners just as some people aren't responsible enough to be parents or gun owners; I'd say cleaning up the Commucrats mess!
martel

Atlanta, GA

#39699 May 1, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> how many martels' to blow a Voltaire?
I'm guessin this is the fake waco...bad grammeerin and what not
martel

Atlanta, GA

#39700 May 1, 2013
Wonder if this new amnesty bill will slide by like it did in 87?

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39701 May 1, 2013
martel wrote:
<quoted text>I'm guessin this is the fake waco...bad grammeerin and what not
I'm guessing this is the real martel, bad spelling and"what not".

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39702 May 1, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Felonizing PUBLIC breast exposure, something innocent children shouldn't be exposed to, cutting income tax on ALL EMPLOYEES and replacing it with an increased sales tax, something EVERYONE pays regardless of whether or not they're employed, thus increase tax revenues, taking control of airports so local govts can't funnel federal monies away from there intended purpose and used for pet projects, no different than the Ruler taking contributions from shady organizations, politics 101, some people aren't responsible enough to be dog owners just as some people aren't responsible enough to be parents or gun owners; I'd say cleaning up the Commucrats mess!
Texas has managed to get along for a long time without a"breast law".Can't you understand? Making MORE LAWS is not the true republican way.Members of both parties are taking"shady"money like it's a religion.If the republicans can scrape up ANY decent candidate, they will get my vote in 2016.Pro, has your party ever done something you disapprove of?
TSF

Clayton, NC

#39703 May 1, 2013
Yes, increased sales tax on SOME and NOT on others and then reduced sales taxes on others like race car owners etc.. Nature intended innocent children to be exposed to breasts. That's how they get food as infants. Only a perverted republican would attach a sexual fetish to that part of the female anatomy to the extent that felonizing its exposure would seem even reasonable. Sickos!!!.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Felonizing PUBLIC breast exposure, something innocent children shouldn't be exposed to, cutting income tax on ALL EMPLOYEES and replacing it with an increased sales tax, something EVERYONE pays regardless of whether or not they're employed, thus increase tax revenues, taking control of airports so local govts can't funnel federal monies away from there intended purpose and used for pet projects, no different than the Ruler taking contributions from shady organizations, politics 101, some people aren't responsible enough to be dog owners just as some people aren't responsible enough to be parents or gun owners; I'd say cleaning up the Commucrats mess!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... (Oct '14) 3 min Stray- Dog 17,865
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 21 min Dalai Lama 80,040
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 36 min Hoosier Hillbilly 189,816
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 1 hr Oh my 69,698
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 8 hr REPUBLICANS LIE 102,154
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) 10 hr Farts 940
Election Who do you support for Governor in Texas in 2010? (Oct '10) Tue TexasFarter 19,878
More from around the web