Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35410 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Mike your high opinion of yourself as a"debater"is based in fantasy.I was waiting to give my opinion on the Uganda situation until after I had read your own opinion.I was disappointed at your typical knee jerk response, once again.You attempt to slant every situation to fit into your own narrow world view.For what its worth, I strongly support the separation of church and state.I find the Uganda situation deplorable.
Do you thing god should be taken out of the pledge of allegiance?

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35411 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>If you had any balls as a debater, you would have not waited for my opinion. Again, did you really expect me to have any other opinion on the matter than what I said?
I am very vocal and open on my opinions of church and state, unlike yourself. I will debate it with anyone here, unlike yourself. I will debate any issue of religion, unlike yourself.
See the stark contrast?
To be honest, I really thought you might have something fresh on the subject.I was wrong.I have stated my opinions on church and state repeatedly here.I'm ready for an actual exchange of ideas.You on the other hand, only engage in self-congratulatory artifice.That's pretty stark, Mr.Duquette.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35412 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Oddly enough, many"scientists"beli eve in GOD.I support GOD, Mike.Not religion.My opinion of the"religious right"I believe is apparent in my strong support of the separation of church and state.I'd also like to point out the danger of categorizing whole groups of people.
Believing in god is quite different than having evidence of a god. No scientist has evidence of a god.
It is expected that even scientist would believe in a god, as humans instinctively follow the ideals of their parents. Traditions are hard to break even in light of the contradictions.
The overwhelming majority of scientists do not believe in god. Typically this all depends on the field of science one is in and his upbringing.

You claim to support god, but all gods are of religion. Did you invent your own god?

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35413 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>Your question was not specific, as with most all of your questions. Learn to articulate or be treated like an idiot. It takes more than good spelling to articulate well.
ONCE again, I overestimated you, assuming you would know what I was referring to.Do I have to treat you like a moron?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35414 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>You run from debates just like Waco, and no one is even holding a gun to your head. What a chicken shit you are.
Now go run from America.
You handed the $20 bucks over coward....not me.

My wife and I are leaving on our own free accord because we do not agree with the direction your team is taking our country.

Since I am not in a position to fund a secession, either peacefully or by force, will exercise our freedom to agree to disagree with all things democrat, take our money and go somewhere to live in peace free from your teams taxation.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35415 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> To be honest, I really thought you might have something fresh on the subject.I was wrong.I have stated my opinions on church and state repeatedly here.I'm ready for an actual exchange of ideas.You on the other hand, only engage in self-congratulatory artifice.That's pretty stark, Mr.Duquette.
I am not sure what you know, so it is hard to know what you need to be told about the issue.
You questions are still so vague on the issue, I really do not see what you wish to know.
The way I see it, the religion of Christianity has doctrine that says homosexuality is an abomination. So they take it upon themselves to be the police for their mythical god. You support that god, so I think you support that argument they make in ways you evidently do not realize. This is why I object to your beliefs.
You have made statements here in support of the bible. Now I am not sure if you believe the whole bible or just pick and choose randomly what to believe of it. I think it is all questionable.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35416 Feb 10, 2013
Mike you asked if I supported the removal of any reference to GOD in the Pledge of Allegiance.How many times have I commented on my support for the separation of church and state? Do you not get it? The answer is obvious!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35417 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> ONCE again, I overestimated you, assuming you would know what I was referring to.Do I have to treat you like a moron?
Yes, you give him too much credit to be able reasonably deduce a simple thought or idea.

Underlying problem with most cock gobblers. Too emotional.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35418 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> ONCE again, I overestimated you, assuming you would know what I was referring to.Do I have to treat you like a moron?
Sorry but I cannot read minds. How many times must I say this on this thread before you and your buddies realize it? Articulate your questions or be treated like an idiot.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35419 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>Believing in god is quite different than having evidence of a god. No scientist has evidence of a god.
It is expected that even scientist would believe in a god, as humans instinctively follow the ideals of their parents. Traditions are hard to break even in light of the contradictions.
The overwhelming majority of scientists do not believe in god. Typically this all depends on the field of science one is in and his upbringing.
You claim to support god, but all gods are of religion. Did you invent your own god?
THE evidence of GOD is all around us, from the perfect orbits of the planets around the sun, to the perfect symmetry of nature, which provides us oxygen and food.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35420 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>You run from debates just like Waco, and no one is even holding a gun to your head. What a chicken shit you are.
Now go run from America.
And I dismiss all things you have to say, because I know that a puss like yourself brings absolutely nothing to the table to debate intellectually.

Maybe if I were a homo gay bar manager, we could exchange ideas like queer eye for the straight guy.

I should go smack my damn self for even repeating queer eye for the straight guy.

Brb.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35421 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry but I cannot read minds. How many times must I say this on this thread before you and your buddies realize it? Articulate your questions or be treated like an idiot.
Giving you credit for intellect was indeed a mistake on my part, I won't repeat it old man.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35423 Feb 10, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
And I dismiss all things you have to say, because I know that a puss like yourself brings absolutely nothing to the table to debate intellectually.
Maybe if I were a homo gay bar manager, we could exchange ideas like queer eye for the straight guy.
I should go smack my damn self for even repeating queer eye for the straight guy.
Brb.
Thanks for showing evidence yet again you are to chicken to debate me head on. Now go run from America because you cannot handle it.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35424 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Giving you credit for intellect was indeed a mistake on my part, I won't repeat it old man.
Thanks for showing evidence yet again you are to chicken to debate me head on.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35425 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Giving you credit for intellect was indeed a mistake on my part, I won't repeat it old man.
Intellect and reading minds are not the same. Articulate your questions or be treated like an idiot.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#35426 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>I am not sure what you know, so it is hard to know what you need to be told about the issue.
You questions are still so vague on the issue, I really do not see what you wish to know.
The way I see it, the religion of Christianity has doctrine that says homosexuality is an abomination. So they take it upon themselves to be the police for their mythical god. You support that god, so I think you support that argument they make in ways you evidently do not realize. This is why I object to your beliefs.
You have made statements here in support of the bible. Now I am not sure if you believe the whole bible or just pick and choose randomly what to believe of it. I think it is all questionable.
You have a right to believe what you wish.As, I might add, I do myself.Many people get hung up on the Old Testament.The Old Testament is superseded by the New Testament, which tells of Jesus Christ.The Old Testament is full of Jewish dietary laws.Christ said"Its not what goes into a mans mouth that is evil, but what comes out of it". I've noticed that when people seek to criticize the Bible, they pull up something from the O.T. That's because, its very hard to criticize the words of GOD, in the N.T..

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#35427 Feb 10, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>I do not ask for "proof" I ask for evidence. Do you know the difference?
Hell, I would be glad just to here some good philosophical arguments on it, much less have real evidence. I already know zero evidence exists of a god, so asking for some is pointless other than to show you none exists.
Pointing to a star is not evidence of how the star came to be. It is just pointing to a star.
Nor can you point to a star and convince anyone that is was NOT created by God.

You continue to ask for evidence that God exist but provide nothing to show he does not. Oh wait, you said that prayer doesn't work so God must not exist.

That is the basis of your argument? Wow....and you chastise others on how to articulate thoughts, questions and debate tactics.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35428 Feb 10, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> THE evidence of GOD is all around us, from the perfect orbits of the planets around the sun, to the perfect symmetry of nature, which provides us oxygen and food.
Not that the planets have any perfect orbits, but if they did, it does not show evidence a god made it so.
It was once thought that the the orbits were perfect circles due to god, but that was shown as wrong.
Not so sure about a perfect symmetry in nature either. My body is not even perfectly symmetrical. But if it was, just how is this connected to the mythical god you believe in?

You must show a cause and effect reason, not just the end effect. You really have no idea what evidence means, do you?

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35429 Feb 10, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you give him too much credit to be able reasonably deduce a simple thought or idea.
Underlying problem with most cock gobblers. Too emotional.
Oh look, Silver is backing up his pal Waco. How sweet.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35430 Feb 10, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
Nor can you point to a star and convince anyone that is was NOT created by God.
You continue to ask for evidence that God exist but provide nothing to show he does not. Oh wait, you said that prayer doesn't work so God must not exist.
That is the basis of your argument? Wow....and you chastise others on how to articulate thoughts, questions and debate tactics.
I am not so stupid as to claim the star was not created by a god. But Waco was so stupid as to claim it was.

I did not say the lack of answered prayers proved a god did not exist, I said it was evidence against the existence of a god. Of course you have no clue of the massive difference between the two because you have no idea how an intellectual debate is to be had.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 4 min Stupid Obama Bitches 108,305
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 10 min Injudgement 256,398
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 20 min ChicknButt 90,560
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 34 min Billy 97,725
Election OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 52 min Alvin Boss 83,901
Election Who's got your vote for Congress in Texas's 10t... (Oct '14) Tue ShmellyGas 6
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Tue CheeseSniff 1,050
More from around the web