“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33522 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Old heavens, Jimmy Carter is still stinking up planet Earth. Yes, I voted from him too and I'm so ashamed. I still have the Jimmy Carter voting stench in my nose all these years later. Tell you what, you don't come back from mistakes like that!!! Scarred me for life, nose and all!!
Carter is a god compared to Bush. At least Carter did not march our boys off to die for nothing in Iraq.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33523 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the post you responded to idiot. I said "do you believe in a one party rule." There's no hope for your stupidity. Done with you.
"Mike would be happy with a one party, Democrat rule. "

Bacon, read your own words. You seem to forget what you say often.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33524 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
So when someone says, grow some balls, they mean it literally? Who knew?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33525 Jan 26, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I guess that means Texas has to go back to Mexico, Alaska has to go back to the rusky's, Hawaii is on its own. Puerto Rico can't be granted statehood. California goes back to Mexico. Louisiana purchase goes back to France.
Why would they have to go back to origin when they were legally annexed into the US by purchase, results of treaty after the Mexican War, and by legal inclusion in statehood?(Puerto Rico is a US territory that has not applied for statehood.) Your argument is reactionary with no basis of fact. History and Civics are not your strong points, are they? They don't have history courses at NC State? What does this have to do with secession anyway?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33526 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
Did you tell us your man was Newt? No, so do not expect us to read your mind.
Mr Anderson

Los Angeles, CA

#33527 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>And you wonder why our country is losing the battle in education to the countries who have free higher education for all.
Who gives a shit if it a "right" or not? While you sit around bitching about it not being a "right" the countries who do the right thing are making us look stupid.
Mentally Disturbed Homocrat

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33528 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
To our Topix "Judge it" person, I deserve a "brilliant on the stinky Jimmy Carter post. Come on, throw me a few crumbs!!:)
Look at the nut trying beg for a pat on the back.
I am sure Waco will be around soon enough.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33529 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
So, you could not write in Gingrich on the ballot, both in the Primary and Presidential elections? I was mistaken. I thought I could even write in Taxpayer on the ballot if I wanted to. Anyone can be written in. "You can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket" is absolutely not true at all. Write in's have always existed in America.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33530 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
I ask you those questions to make you think for a moment about the party you are blindly supporting. If you have no defense, I will tell you why the Republicans did not outlaw all abortions when they had the opportunity. Here is the answer. The party elite don't really want abortions to end. Why? Because if outlawed, every Republican candidate on every level of government could not use the Pro life mantra in all their campagin literature and all the dumbasses that believe this bs would not vote for them. That is the exact reason why. All the backwoods Baptist that vote Republican would be lost for something to vote Republican for. By the way, Republicans use this same political tactic for guns and gays. It keeps the ignorant motivated.
So you know what's wrong with the Republican Patty but you can't see what's wrong with your own party.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33531 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't I tell you, Bacon, that Republicans can seldom submit a post without using the fear of Communism as a background argumemt?
See why my statement to you..."The ghost of Joseph McCarty will never die as long as there is one Republican left on the earth" Here is more proof.
Straw man

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33532 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>"Mike would be happy with a one party, Democrat rule. "
Bacon, read your own words. You seem to forget what you say often.
Again, I didn't say we had a one party rule. I said you would be happy with a one party rule. No, I don't seem to forget, you can't comprehend. From another post, I'm not the only one that believes you're a bit extreme.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33533 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you guys like to burn the American flag, spit on members of the military, walk around at political functions you oppose dressed like vaginas to show how proud you are of killing unborn babies and are ashamed to have God mentioned in your platform. Now that right there is the sign of a true patriot, OFF THE DEEP END.
So please explain how god not being something we wish to promote with government is not patriotic again?

Nevermind, I am sure you do not have the balls to debate this.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33534 Jan 26, 2013
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>Mentally Disturbed Homocrat
Republican.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33535 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Look at the nut trying beg for a pat on the back.
I am sure Waco will be around soon enough.
Just like you begging to know who disagreed with you with the "judging reply" a while back. You remember you wanted to know who disagreed with you and why?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33536 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, I didn't say we had a one party rule. I said you would be happy with a one party rule. No, I don't seem to forget, you can't comprehend. From another post, I'm not the only one that believes you're a bit extreme.
I would be happy with the democrats in the majority, but that is still not really one party rule.
You claimed I would be happy with one party rule, but you don't know shit. You just guess based upon your extreme hate for all things liberal.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33537 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Arnold, pardon my language but you don't know $hit about how we run our business and what we'd do. When my husband first started out, he worked by himself with the help of a sub contractor when needed. It paid the bills and we survived. We're not into prison time or legal fines. All you're going off of is your opinion and frankly I don't give a damn what you think you know is in my nature. It's a$$holes you like that run around thinking they know everything about everyone when you don't and then you want to label them based off your skewed misconceptions. "I bet it was in your nature to take a job based off affirmative action. Would I be correct in assuming that you couldn't get a job based off your ability but based off your race?" Now how does it feel to have someone accuse you of something they know nothing about? That is an example of how you operate. Own it Arnold.
I was was recommended for hiring by strong references (both black and white) who had known me all of my life. No Affimative Action was involved as far as I know. You can say what you want in a post, but I still beleive that you would hire illegally if your livlihood came down to that being the only option. Being called an asshole is an honor, especially coming from a Republican. It's not the first time, and will not be the last. I will wear it like a crown. I relish more opportunities.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33538 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So please explain how god not being something we wish to promote with government is not patriotic again?
Nevermind, I am sure you do not have the balls to debate this.
Nor do you and I'm not speaking metaphorically.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33539 Jan 26, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Straw man
Show me where I am wrong. It is in a great majority of your post, as well as in the post of your fellow Republicans. Do you not read Taypayers posts?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33540 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Bacon, Have you ever considered the fact that there would be no illegal aliens if none of the crooked and greedy business owners who hire them would refuse to do so? Why is your complaint not against the ones who hire the illegals? They are actually creating the problem. Also, what do you think the cost of produce would be in the grocery store if no one was working to harvest these crops for less than minimum wage? Questions for you to ponder.
Have you ever considered that our govt is just as crooked as the business owners because they allow them to cross the border then give them FREE healthcare? If they were denied healthcare, just as with a job, they would return home or be deported. Have you ever considered the fact that the cost of healthcare would be considerably lower if we didn't have to pay for the illegals through our own plans? So why isn't your complaint against our govt since THEY'RE the ones creating the problem? Oh that's right, you exploit them because you need their vote!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33541 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>You are really reaching quite a bit to call this a promotion of communism or socialism.
There is no conspiracy moron.
You are either blind or incompetent....or both!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 16 min Jay 182,267
Election Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... (Oct '14) 1 hr 123pictures 7,851
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 2 hr Synergy 66,491
Election Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 3 hr Jerry K 35,300
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 4 hr bacon hater 76,473
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 9 hr The GOP Is Dying ... 101,516
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana... (Oct '10) Fri Not Landrieu 4,779
More from around the web