lol

Jackson, TN

#88118 Jul 13, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
You ARE Trash! Your Posts have shown that, over and over!
And BTW, Trashy Doofus, I'm not "Sassy" anymore since one of your little Playmates began forging my Posts, I'm the REGISTERED "SSS", because they forge those posts, too, but they have to do it Unregistered! If it's Unregistered, it's NOT my Post, regardless of the Name they forge!
Thieves are Thieves, no matter what they steal, they're still Thieves, even on a Forum!
I'll bet TEA Baggers steal everything they can get their hands on, or get any other way, too! Just my opinion...
Skank, you are the one on here desperate for a man's attention. Anyone that flirts with you. You are beside yourself flirting and begging for sex. That is a trashy skank, not me. Fyi,if your dumbazz could read this post was to oa about "really" . It didn't have anything to do with you, nasty skank!!Learn to read, crack ho

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88119 Jul 13, 2013
Timbuk2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Narrated by Ed Asner - a RICH guy.
So...? He earned it, he didn't cheat Others to get it, nor take it from Others who had less than him, nor demand that they make less, so he could make more, and I'm quite sure he has always paid his Fair Share of Taxes. So, what's your point?
lol

Jackson, TN

#88120 Jul 13, 2013
Not Willard wrote:
<quoted text>Oh !!! What shocking language !!! Are you kidding or just that ignorant ?? I'll go with ignorant.
The language was a liberal post, moron. Wow liberals are the most idiotic morons and illiterate.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88121 Jul 13, 2013
Timbuk2 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have eloquently expressed the difference between conservative and liberal.
The conservative says this is the way I believe, and it is the way things should be.
The liberal says, I feel this is the way I believe, but I could change my mind, but anyway, you can do whatever you want, because you have the right to.
Unless you want a 32oz soft drink. Or a large fries. Or......
Are you honestly saying that you hate Liberals because you can't buy a 32-oz. Soft Drink and a Large Fries in New York City???

Buy a half dozen of both, whatever size they allow, that should solve your hunger, thirst, and Liberal-hating Problem! Problem Solved! Geez!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88123 Jul 13, 2013
Vet wrote:
<quoted text>Well, OA, do you have enough integrity to stop your addictions, huh?
Do you have enough integrity to stop Lying and falsely accusing Posters of things you know aren't true?
Your "addictions" seem to be in the "moral" category and destructive to Others, while OA's are NOT. Now, which is worse? His or YOURS?
In my opinion, you have more than enough problems of your own to work on, if you would just do it. But you won't, because you're too busy fabricating what you claim are OA's "addictions". Is that because you don't have the courage to face, and deal with, your OWN numerous problems? A self-induced "Diversion", if you will?
You should do something about that "Obsessive Stalking" problem and that "Bullying Addiction" that you have, too....and I've just touched on the tip of the iceberg of you numerous Morality "Addictions" that I think you have, based on what you have shown on this Forum, alone.
lol

Jackson, TN

#88124 Jul 13, 2013
I received this in a forwarded email earlier this week. This is really straight forward thinking and ďcalls it like it is....Ē Itís attributed to standup comedian Jeff Foxworthy though I couldnít corroborate that from a brief internet search. If Mr. Foxworthy said this then kudos to him for his clever observations. If not, then kudos to whoever wrote it. But this pretty well sums up how Conservatives and Liberals view the world.

Jeff Foxworthy on the fence: Which side of the fence?

If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a Liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a Liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a Liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.(Remember, respect is always earned).

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A Liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host because of what he/she says, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a Conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A Liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A Liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

Posted 16th September 2012 by fedoradude

Labels: liberals, conservatives

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#88126 Jul 13, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
OW Posted:
"This is because an insidious danger lies inherent in this destructive and life changing activity. As you rightly observe, God wants us to love one another! This is the reason I shall remain motivated to steer our brothers, those who may listen and consider, away from an angry reef threatening those in hopelessness, rebellion, mental or emotional trauma or anger!"
----------
OW, please tell me why all of you Conservatives seem to think THEY should steer anybody from anything, and never let up trying to do it...if God, Himself, who could do it in an instant, refuses to.
God lets People make their own choices and be what they are, rightly or wrongly. He doesn't beat them over the head, day in and day out, demanding that they do as he tells them to do ad believe what he tells them to believe. So, why do you Conservative Mortals think you should do what God, himself, will NOT do, and try to force Others to believe and act, just like you determine they should.
Isn't that proving that Conservatives think they are more important, and powerful, than God, himself...or, at least, they're trying to be?
And most of what Conservatives seem to be trying to force Others to do, is totally contradictory to what tells us ALL to do!
God gave everybody Free Will and it does not force anybody to live the way he said we should, or even try to. So, why do the Conservatives think it is their "place" to do what God , won't?
And remember, God made Homosexuals, just like he made Everybody Else, according to what you Religious People claim to believe, but you don't act like you really believe that, UNLESS the Other Person looks just like you, acts just like you, thinks just like you, and says they believe the exact same things you believe about EVERYTHING!
How do you explain all of that?
In part you asked the following:

"OW, please tell me why all of you Conservatives seem to think THEY should steer anybody from anything, and never let up trying to do it...if God, Himself, who could do it in an instant, refuses to."

I cannot speak for "you conservatives," as you muse. But, the bible conveys a clear understanding that God charges his own with this responsibility and many others. Humanity is under God's early charge of taking "Dominion" over the earth, filling it, worshiping him and much more. And, as Dunlapian correctly pointed out we are to - love one another.

Envy of his brotherís right living and guilt over his own failures caused Cain to murder his brother. It is always that way. Evil cannot bear righteousness. Therefore: "do not be surprised, brothers, that the world hates you. We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brothers. Whoever does not love abides in death. Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him" 1st John 3, 13-15.

John reminds us that the original way of right living taught by Christ included love of neighbor. He says: "By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother". 1st John 3:10

None of this means that a "sinless life" is possible, it means God wants every single soul he created to love him back, and constantly beckons us through these intimations over and over. Many get stuck over the word "righteousness," and what it means to have or to seek it. Righteousness, to be had by anyone, is always "righteousness through Jesus Christ, and him crucified"! It is "never" anything else. In other words, humans can only be reconciled back to God when found to be "righteous" by virtue of Loving his son, Jesus for taking our place in Judgement!

I couldn't love anyone, without warning them of missing the gift of God's eternal forgiveness, grace and eternal life! Thanks for having an interest. Forgive lengthy response..I gotta' go!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88127 Jul 13, 2013
You Conservatives DO LOVE those Propaganda Pieces. It doesn't matter whether it's true or not, just as long as it says what you like to hear. That's all that matters.
I wonder if you're like that in your Private and Personal Life, also.
My guess is, "YES".

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88128 Jul 13, 2013
ORIGINAL WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
In part you asked the following:
"OW, please tell me why all of you Conservatives seem to think THEY should steer anybody from anything, and never let up trying to do it...if God, Himself, who could do it in an instant, refuses to."
I cannot speak for "you conservatives," as you muse. But, the bible conveys a clear understanding that God charges his own with this responsibility and many others. Humanity is under God's early charge of taking "Dominion" over the earth, filling it, worshiping him and much more. And, as Dunlapian correctly pointed out we are to - love one another.
Envy of his brotherís right living and guilt over his own failures caused Cain to murder his brother. It is always that way. Evil cannot bear righteousness. Therefore: "do not be surprised, brothers, that the world hates you. We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brothers. Whoever does not love abides in death. Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him" 1st John 3, 13-15.
John reminds us that the original way of right living taught by Christ included love of neighbor. He says: "By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother". 1st John 3:10
None of this means that a "sinless life" is possible, it means God wants every single soul he created to love him back, and constantly beckons us through these intimations over and over. Many get stuck over the word "righteousness," and what it means to have or to seek it. Righteousness, to be had by anyone, is always "righteousness through Jesus Christ, and him crucified"! It is "never" anything else. In other words, humans can only be reconciled back to God when found to be "righteous" by virtue of Loving his son, Jesus for taking our place in Judgement!
I couldn't love anyone, without warning them of missing the gift of God's eternal forgiveness, grace and eternal life! Thanks for having an interest. Forgive lengthy response..I gotta' go!
The King James version of the Bible that has been translated numerous times, that has words in it that there are no corresponding words in the English Language for the Hebrew Word, so another English Word was used (which might, and can, change the entire meaning), AND that King James had his Scholars insert a lot of things into it, just to keep "his Masses" (People) in line and make it easier for him to Rule them...that King James Bible!
And BTW, isn't there one or two Books that are in the Catholic Bible , but are left completely out of the Protestant Bible? "Vet" should be able to tell you all about that, since he's Catholic.

But, doesn't that make the Bible a Poor Source to "literally" live by, and be sure that you're doing what God really wants you to do, instead of listening to what he tells you is right and wrong, in your thoughts and conscience? He has the Power to do that, you know. It's just that some People ignore it! They will, instead listen to a Mortal Man (Preacher) and do what that Mortal Man claims to have read, and interpreted the meaning of, in the already "Altered" Bible.
THAT just makes no sense to me, especially when ALL those Mortal Men (Preachers) seem to have a different interpretation of what that "Altered" Bible says and means for People to do, even in the same Protestant Denomination! And they ALL claim their "interpretation" is the Right One...even YOU!
God gave ALL of us the ability to think for Ourselves and to reason things out (Common Sense), but way too Many of us refuse to use it!
BC Alien

United States

#88129 Jul 13, 2013
Vet wrote:
<quoted text>When America and its institutions are being systematically destroyed, it is the duty of every American to so note. I believe you meant "maladapted" which is an adj. and not an adv. but nice try.
Unions is the only institution I can think of being systematically destroyed. What did you have in mind?
Maladaptive:
1. Marked by faulty or inadequate adaptation.
2. Not assisting or promoting adaptation.

ed would indicate the past. Pubs are ongoing in their failure to adapt. Eg, pick one race, sexuality, law/abortion etc.etc.etc...

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88130 Jul 13, 2013
BC Alien wrote:
<quoted text>Unions is the only institution I can think of being systematically destroyed. What did you have in mind?
Maladaptive:
1. Marked by faulty or inadequate adaptation.
2. Not assisting or promoting adaptation.
ed would indicate the past. Pubs are ongoing in their failure to adapt. Eg, pick one race, sexuality, law/abortion etc.etc.etc...
Is it IMPOSSIBLE for you to make a coherent Post? After all of this time and we're All still waiting for one from you.
Try leaving off the Beer, and whatever else you're using, and try taking your Medication before you Post. Then, just MAYBE the Post will make sense...or, Maybe not...we'll have to see!
Vet

Fayetteville, GA

#88131 Jul 13, 2013
BC Alien wrote:
<quoted text>Unions is the only institution I can think of being systematically destroyed. What did you have in mind?
Maladaptive:
1. Marked by faulty or inadequate adaptation.
2. Not assisting or promoting adaptation.
ed would indicate the past. Pubs are ongoing in their failure to adapt. Eg, pick one race, sexuality, law/abortion etc.etc.etc...
There is no such word as maladaptive. It is not in my Random House Webster's College Dictionary, copyright 2001. Maladaptation and maladapted are words, maladaptive is not. Nice try...again. Your first sentence is incorrect also, "unions are," not unions is. Subject and verb must agree. As to the institutions being systematically destroyed, try the Constitution and the Boy Scouts. There are more but those two will suffice for now.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88132 Jul 13, 2013
"A Look At the Jurors For The Zimmerman Trial."

Click here:
http://news.yahoo.com/look-jurors-george-zimm...
Vet

Fayetteville, GA

#88133 Jul 13, 2013
BC Alien wrote:
<quoted text>Unions is the only institution I can think of being systematically destroyed. What did you have in mind?
Maladaptive:
1. Marked by faulty or inadequate adaptation.
2. Not assisting or promoting adaptation.
ed would indicate the past. Pubs are ongoing in their failure to adapt. Eg, pick one race, sexuality, law/abortion etc.etc.etc...
It was I who judged your post as clueless... because there is no "uneducated" judge it. It is what it is.
Timbuk2

Jamestown, TN

#88134 Jul 13, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you honestly saying that you hate Liberals because you can't buy a 32-oz. Soft Drink and a Large Fries in New York City???
Buy a half dozen of both, whatever size they allow, that should solve your hunger, thirst, and Liberal-hating Problem! Problem Solved! Geez!
I don't believe I used the word hate.
Vet

Fayetteville, GA

#88135 Jul 13, 2013
Timbuk2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe I used the word hate.
You didn't Tim but I detest liberals who are assaulting the First, Second and Fourth Amendment. They will get around to the rest of them eventually.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#88136 Jul 13, 2013
Vet wrote:
<quoted text>There is no such word as maladaptive. It is not in my Random House Webster's College Dictionary, copyright 2001. Maladaptation and maladapted are words, maladaptive is not. Nice try...again. Your first sentence is incorrect also, "unions are," not unions is. Subject and verb must agree. As to the institutions being systematically destroyed, try the Constitution and the Boy Scouts. There are more but those two will suffice for now.
Main Entry: mal∑adap∑tive
Pronunciation:\-tiv\
Function: adjective
Date: 1931
1 : marked by poor or inadequate adaptation 2 : not conducive to adaptation

http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/...
BC Alien

United States

#88137 Jul 13, 2013
Vet wrote:
<quoted text>There is no such word as maladaptive. It is not in my Random House Webster's College Dictionary, copyright 2001. Maladaptation and maladapted are words, maladaptive is not. Nice try...again. Your first sentence is incorrect also, "unions are," not unions is. Subject and verb must agree. As to the institutions being systematically destroyed, try the Constitution and the Boy Scouts. There are more but those two will suffice for now.
Now your just pulling my leg or blowing smoke up my a**. Pissin on my leg and calling it rain, take your pick. Grammar never way my forte but hey I adapted and you get the messasge. I'm just as mystified as Bill Mar that you would bring up the Boy Scouts. I'm sure if they had made any changes recently in the constitution I would have heard about it. Looks like the last time that happened was 1992 with a smelly pub for pres.(Smelled like a lying sack of ----)Well admit it. It's time to make some changes. It will happen in 50-100 years. Remember the word Adaptation.
Now what is it that has you so upset about the Boy Scouts?
Vet

Fayetteville, GA

#88138 Jul 13, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
Main Entry: mal∑adap∑tive
Pronunciation:\-tiv\
Function: adjective
Date: 1931
1 : marked by poor or inadequate adaptation 2 : not conducive to adaptation
http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/...
Well, OA, 1931 is a mite out of date. Mine is 2001 and I don't believe you have a 1931 dictionary and if you do, it isn't there. Nice try.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#88139 Jul 13, 2013
"Jurors In Zimmerman Trial Have Question."

Click here:
http://news.yahoo.com/jurors-zimmerman-trial-...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 6 min mjjcpa 34,952
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 13 min republiCONS 175,852
Election OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 54 min Jenks 82,664
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 1 hr Yes it is me 74,363
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 1 hr On the contrary 100,792
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 1 hr loses again 63,101
Election Who's got your vote for Congress in Kentucky's ... 3 hr treetops5 24
More from around the web