Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

#65220 Feb 6, 2013
Congressman Jim McDermott (D-Washington) was on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" Tuesday.

ďThis whole society is gradually changing in response to whatís going on. Now, weíre in a very difficult period right now, because we have a lot of people who suddenly think itís all about me. And it isnít about me; itís about we. If we donít take care of one another, and we say everybodyís on their own, then it will simply fall apart as a society: become a mob scene, as it was in Paris if you go see Les Misťrables. You can see what the country can become, if you donít have equity in the society. I donít want that. I want people to be able to have a peaceful life. And I think our system will work.Ē
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65221 Feb 6, 2013
Mike wrote:
<quoted text>(INTERPOL),*"it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983," A little old for obama to sign it.
You're a little behind here, Mike. This '83 code was being "Ammended"!
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65222 Feb 6, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/12/...
So what does the counterterrorism official from the Bush years think of this?
He can't believe it's taken this long.
"To the extent that granting these immunities to INTERPOL furthers the efficacy or ease of information-sharing or joint action on an expedited basis to act on warrants
seems like a no brainer to me," the official says.
"Conservatives can't have it both ways," the official says. "You can't be complaining about the hypothetical abdication of US jurisdiction at the same time you're complaining the Obama administration is not being tough enough on national security."
Obama administration officials say this new executive order doesn't allow INTERPOL to do any more than they were allowed to do once Reagan recognized them as a public international organization. Though clearly the Executive Order does prohibit US law enforcement from searching and seizing INTERPOL records, officials say, those provisions can be waived by the president if need be.
Are you suggesting you're surprised to discover Obama isn't the only American President complicit in the destruction of American sovereignty, along with our remaining constitutional integrity? In the instance of George Bush, you'd be referring to the very creator of homeland security, fusion centers, the first financial failure and bail-out, the systematic militarization of municiple law enforcement agencies and the creation of the Millenneum challenge corporation. George Bush not only created the MCC, but providced the first $2.25 billion tax-payer dollars to create this global bureaucracy by which to achieve global re-distribution of wealth. Hillary Clinton was the chairwoman of the MCC until very recently. Of course, Obama has continued this incredible mega-billion give-away by sending Hillary all over the world to build assets in other countries while America goes bankrupt to eventually fall into her own failing infrastructure. If you're in doubt, I'll happilly provide documentation to this effect. Anyone can see it themselves on the u.n. website, and elsewhere. Yes, everyone's almost out of the closet now!
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65223 Feb 6, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/12/...
So what does the counterterrorism official from the Bush years think of this?
He can't believe it's taken this long.
"To the extent that granting these immunities to INTERPOL furthers the efficacy or ease of information-sharing or joint action on an expedited basis to act on warrants
seems like a no brainer to me," the official says.
"Conservatives can't have it both ways," the official says. "You can't be complaining about the hypothetical abdication of US jurisdiction at the same time you're complaining the Obama administration is not being tough enough on national security."
Obama administration officials say this new executive order doesn't allow INTERPOL to do any more than they were allowed to do once Reagan recognized them as a public international organization. Though clearly the Executive Order does prohibit US law enforcement from searching and seizing INTERPOL records, officials say, those provisions can be waived by the president if need be.
Again, This shouldn't be surprising to anyone. This is no more surprising that the collaborative associations or shared intent of agenda between our President and his marxist/socialist Czars, cabinet members, advisors, personal friends and family members. When deception becomes lucrative, subversives show up instantly...kinda' like roaches!

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#65224 Feb 6, 2013
WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
This administration is not morally constrained by our constitution. Pernicious doctrines of subjective truth, subjective morality, subjective relevancy, subjective ethics have now morphed into what I can only consider - subjective legal doctrines.
There are multiple bodies of law which, in and of themselves are foreboding. These seminal bodies of law are even darker when examined together. When separate legal empowerments pick up legal definitions found in separate but relevant sections of law, they become legally synergistic and reveal a dark and coherent intent!
Such is the case involving much of the current of law pursuant to to homeland security measures (LAWS) which deal with "continuity of government" and "exigent circumstances" during or after "ANY" "National Emergency".
Similar and additional libertires were taken (unconstitutionally) and are apparent in the 2013 NDAA law (National Defense Authorization Act). The legal definition of (north continental United States of America) has been legally declaired: a "Battlefield" in the war against terrorists! This will, by laws already passed, permit American citizens in the U.S. to be declaired "Domestic enemy combatants", subject to administrative prerogatives of targeted killing, not only by means of a drone strike.
Please also know that the threshold of evidence requires less than Probable cause or resonable suspicion, requiring on "suspicion" with language included having to do with those who are suspected as "political Beligerants". You may not be aware that Obama has now authorized "INTERPOL" to operate with total impunity within U.S. borders. Obama, with an executive order, stopped any and all oversight possibilities over this dubious organization tied to the KGB. Obama blocked all oversight of INTERPOL operations in the U.S. by Congress, F.B.I., C.I.A., and even the justice department! His executive order even blocks the powers of all sunshine laws in America, including the "freedom of Information Act". All of this information is available to anyone...It just requires work! Good luck to you.
INTERPOL is the World-wide Law Enforcement Agency. Every Law Enforcement Agency in the United States has access to it in their Database. So, whatcha talking about, Willard?
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65225 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
<quoted text>
INTERPOL is the World-wide Law Enforcement Agency. Every Law Enforcement Agency in the United States has access to it in their Database. So, whatcha talking about, Willard?
Your illiteracy isn't my problem!

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#65226 Feb 6, 2013
BTW Folks, this is my new User Name, in case you haven't figured it out.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#65227 Feb 6, 2013
WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
Your illiteracy isn't my problem!
No, but you're trying to make your Lying, ours! INTERPOL, a KGB affiliated Organization??? You're full of chit!
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65228 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
BTW Folks, this is my new User Name, in case you haven't figured it out.
But, how do we know who you are now..or who you were then?
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65229 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but you're trying to make your Lying, ours! INTERPOL, a KGB affiliated Organization??? You're full of chit!
The interpol organization was was a known tentacle of the KGB and remained saturated by spies during and long after the cold war. This is just for starters.

I believe your ideas of who'se full of somethin' is sorely misplaced!

Since you're it here, you should spell it correctly - "Lively but not very lite"
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65230 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
BTW Folks, this is my new User Name, in case you haven't figured it out.
O.k., what does a cat licking its lips have to do with "lite & lively"?

Obviously this is our job to figure out who you are because of some latent identity derrangement issue, or maybe just a desparately needed drama value..yes?
Hey

Manchester, TN

#65231 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
BTW Folks, this is my new User Name, in case you haven't figured it out.
Sounds like fat free Yogurt to me.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#65232 Feb 6, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Willard, which Executive Order did our President Obama sign to block all Sunshine Laws in America?
WILLARD, I just asked a simple question!
Pete

Nashville, TN

#65233 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure that you genuinely see it that way because considering another's point of view and respecting it, is a totally foreign concept to you. Let me guess, you're a Tea Party Member, aren't you?
You are hysterical. When was the last time YOU ever considered another's point of view and respected it? As long as someone has the liberal point of view, you respect it. If it is anything else, you bash it. You are not even smart enough to realize when you contradict yourself, which you do sometimes in one post. Do you actually think anyone pays any attention to your self touted proclamations? I can't believe you are not embarrassed with some of your obvious contradictions. Everybody sees it but you.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#65234 Feb 6, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/12/...
So what does the counterterrorism official from the Bush years think of this?
He can't believe it's taken this long.
"To the extent that granting these immunities to INTERPOL furthers the efficacy or ease of information-sharing or joint action on an expedited basis to act on warrants
seems like a no brainer to me," the official says.
"Conservatives can't have it both ways," the official says. "You can't be complaining about the hypothetical abdication of US jurisdiction at the same time you're complaining the Obama administration is not being tough enough on national security."
Obama administration officials say this new executive order doesn't allow INTERPOL to do any more than they were allowed to do once Reagan recognized them as a public international organization. Though clearly the Executive Order does prohibit US law enforcement from searching and seizing INTERPOL records, officials say, those provisions can be waived by the president if need be.
Good luck with getting a answer for your question!
Pete

Nashville, TN

#65235 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, there are steps you, yourself , can do to limit the food damage of the companies, so stop whining about that.
As for the damage from a Nuclear Attack, if the back and forth didn't completely destroy the world, then what would be left, nobody in their right Mind would want to try to live in, anyway. There are some things worse than death and that would be one of them.
People like you can't enjoy their Life for worrying that they are going to lose it....kinda the same way you are about your money. And you call that "Living"...I don't! I call that a perpetual state of misery! Good God, Man, let go of things you have no control over before you waste what Life you have left! I suspect you've already wasted the biggest part of it, doing exactly what you are doing now...living in a constant state of fear, some real but most, imaginary!
I suppose you call this reply "considering another's opinion and respecting it." Before posing as a life counselor, maybe you should fix yours first.

“"U.S. Constitution"”

Since: Mar 09

Tea-Party

#65236 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
This is typical Tea Party BS...Cantor wants to cut everything that benefits the majority of the Average American People, but not one word about cutting anything for the Super Rich or cutting any of their numerous Tax Loopholes! Still protecting the Super Wealthy, at all costs!
"You can put Lipstick on a Pig, but it's still a Pig!"
----------
"Top Republican Tries To Usher GOP Past Dollars And Cents."
Click here:
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/...
Why are we now in our 5th year with out a budget....

“"U.S. Constitution"”

Since: Mar 09

Tea-Party

#65237 Feb 6, 2013
anybody hear the Obama claim he has created 6 million jobs today, how could that be there is 12 million more unemployed than when he took office, somebody is lying here
Pete

Nashville, TN

#65238 Feb 6, 2013
Lite N Lively wrote:
This is typical Tea Party BS...Cantor wants to cut everything that benefits the majority of the Average American People, but not one word about cutting anything for the Super Rich or cutting any of their numerous Tax Loopholes! Still protecting the Super Wealthy, at all costs!
"You can put Lipstick on a Pig, but it's still a Pig!"


Ok Einstein, name one tax loophole the rich get?
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#65239 Feb 6, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>WILLARD, I just asked a simple question!
I just answered it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 16 min Mgtn Res 72,767
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 21 min Dix 172,569
OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 22 min TAMARA 81,994
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 1 hr the anti-chicken... 62,284
Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... 6 hr Miss G 3,832
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Car... (Oct '10) 10 hr Joe Dinglebell 61,794
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 15 hr xxxrayted 34,873
More from around the web