No, I didn't read it. I actually SKIM the surface - glance... it takes about 10 seconds & I'm good. I'll say it ONE MORE TIME, I'm not a fan of Oh my or Guest, that's not NEW news. I read what interests me, you two DO NOT.<quoted text>
Well obviously you read it. What's the matter DZ are you not sufficiently qualified to wear the badge of honor? The "green square" ..now those folks are funny. They are as funny as watching the chimpanzee's at the zoo.
#17016 Jul 2, 2013
#17017 Jul 2, 2013
I skim their posts hoping that they announce that they have contracted AIDS and are dying, but that's just me. I hope they all give each other AIDS and die, but again that's just me.
#17018 Jul 2, 2013
LOL the mentality of a 13 yr. old. Obviously anyone who supports gay civil rights has got to be gay. Just like it was proven that the white folks who supported civil rights for blacks were obviously black themselves made up to look white. Poor poor ricky, he must have been kicked out of VBS for being too stupid. Jebus would surely be disappointed.
Since: Jul 12
#17019 Jul 2, 2013
Just another post that will give the excuse making liberals more indigestion. It tells of some of the impending problems the Democrats are going to face because of the AHCA. You can only fake it for just so long folks. Then out comes the truth.
#17020 Jul 2, 2013
An eye opener...What about this information Obama lovers and liberals
These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.
There are actually two messages here. The first is very
interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.
A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very
interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received
treatment within six months:
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it
within six months:
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are
in "excellent health":
And now for the last statistic:
National Health Insurance?
Check this last set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked
in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt. 38%
Wilson . 52%
F. Roosevelt. 50%
GH Bush. 51%
Clinton . 39%
GW Bush. 55%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the
last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big
corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one
with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk
about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has
never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff
and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia,
government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
They should have been in an employment line.
Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media
IN GOD WE TRUST
#17021 Jul 2, 2013
Dontcha just love those right wing chain mails,
Course you might want to open both eyes...
Since: Jul 12
#17022 Jul 2, 2013
+1 Great post!
#17023 Jul 2, 2013
oooops, pants still on fire...
...The writer, Michael Cembalest, examined the histories of nine Cabinet positions for the comparison. The departments they headed were Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation and Treasury:
...Chu headed the electronics research lab at AT&T Bell Laboratories; Donovan served as managing director of Prudential Mortgage Capital Co.; and Salazar has been a partner in his family's farm, and he owned and operated a Dairy Queen and radio stations in his home state of Colorado.
Three other Obama appointees had legal experience in the private sector: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner worked for Kissinger Associates, a consulting firm that advises international corporations on political and economic conditions overseas.
Cembalest said that he did discount the corporate experience of Clinton, Vilsack and Locke. Cembalest acknowledged fault in missing Salazar's business background, saying he would have given him a full point if he had it to do over again. Cembalest said Chu and Donovan did not represent the kind of private-sector business experience he was looking for when doing his study. Cembalest said he did not mean for his research to be used for political ends.
Since: Jan 10
#17024 Jul 2, 2013
Yep, the (lack of) class continuously shows itself...
#17025 Jul 2, 2013
I'm glad you liked it you queer lovin fat POS. I don't have class. I have SWAG. Nerd.
#17027 Jul 2, 2013
More pants on fire (And there's more if one cares to look) the mail keeps on going :
#17028 Jul 2, 2013
My guess is they don't count all the dead people collecting benefits. Just a bit of info they'd rather not throw out there. And, this is just Massachusetts. Oh well.
#17029 Jul 2, 2013
Did they mention the welfare benefits going to US prisoners? No? I didn't think so... And this is just New Jersey.
#17030 Jul 2, 2013
Individual cases of welfare fraud are too numerous to mention... 1000 & 1000s totaling billions. Oh, but let's make it all about ridiculing a "chain letter". Can the dumbocrats get any dumber??
#17031 Jul 2, 2013
A young man walked into the local welfare office to pick up his check. He marched up to the counter and said, "Hi . You know, I just HATE drawing welfare. I'd really rather have a job. I don't like taking advantage of the system, getting something for nothing."
The social worker behind the counter said, "Your timing is excellent.
We just got a job opening from a very wealthy old man who wants a Chauffeur and bodyguard for his beautiful daughter . "
"You'll have to drive around in his 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL, and he will supply all of your clothes . "
"Because of the long hours, meals will be provided . You'll also be expected to escort the daughter on her overseas holiday trips . "
"This is rather awkward to say but you will also have, as part of your job, the assignment to satisfy her sexual urges as the daughter is in her mid-20's and has a rather strong sex drive . "
The guy, just plain wide-eyed, said, "You're bullshittin' me!"
The social worker said, "Yeah, but ... You started it . "
#17032 Jul 2, 2013
That's just silly DZ. Nobody was making anything "all about" anything. The poster linked some specific sites that have been proven to contain distorted information. That information came from specific RWW chain emails. There are lots of them. The ridicule was specific about specific chain emails. Now if the links that you posted are accurate then why certainly there ought to be a stop put to fraud. You have engaged, to a small degree, it the type of distortion that I have been referring to when you say "...all about..." . It just isn't true.
#17033 Jul 2, 2013
Now that's funny.
#17034 Jul 2, 2013
By all means shed light on the fraud, and when your state legislators want to slash the administrative budget (systems development, manpower for case work) for these types of departments shed light on that too, cause it's admin that oversees this stuff.
Oh the terrible ridicule to point out the misinformation, the lies, to think that sock puppet may never post again.
#17035 Jul 2, 2013
No, you reign above ALL who post here with your twisting & spinning- distortions. Don't EVEN try that. The point is, welfare recipients out number employed Americans. Only the LIVING can be honest wage earners. The living, dead, prisoners & your cat can draw welfare. And you don't see a problem? Okay, done here, you just answered the question, DUMBOCRATS grow dumber as each day passes. Moving along..... I hate bickering with fools.
#17036 Jul 2, 2013
Ok dumba-in my post you responded too, I said "provision of security at mass events."
Now you being a bright boy, why don't you just tell us what that statement means?
and get Oh my to help you out since he doen't seem to know what it means also.
Add your comments below
|Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10)||2 min||River Tam||94,647|
|'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10)||2 min||Uncle Tab||247,284|
|Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10)||3 hr||TRUMPOCALYPSE||106,883|
|Who are you voting for in the Georgia Governor ... (Oct '14)||11 hr||jimmy||26|
|Who do you support for State Senator in New Yor... (Oct '10)||22 hr||Louis K Lepke||28|
|Who's got your vote for Congress in West Virgin... (Nov '14)||Wed||Senator Alex Wein...||6|
|Who are you voting for in the Florida Governor ... (Oct '14)||Oct 19||American||32|
Find what you want!
Search Citizen Sound-Off Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC