Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Cartersville Resident

Cartersville, GA

#8358 Apr 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG! ANOTHER lib living in an alternate universe.
It is better than being in only ONE universe...YOURS!!!
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#8359 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
In a study by William Trenchant of Federal Elections Commission records for donations by journalists, he found that 235 of 255 studied sent donations to Democrat candidates. Bill Dedman of MSNBC conducted a similar study that found that 125 of 143 journalists he studied donated money to Democrat candidates. Given that it can be reasonably inferred that 87-92% of journalists are Democrat, I would say your statement #3 that "Some reporters sometimes say stupid things on live TV." is a virtual certainty. Congratulations.(#1 would be a close second.)
Here's the link to where your story originated. In fact, at the following link you'll find the actual excel spreadsheet with the list of donors and who they gave to. The number was 65% donated Democratic, not 235 of 255. The study was done by the Center for Responsive Politics.(I'm getting real sick of these "Centers").

" Sixty-five percent of all identified donations went to Democrats, the Center’s research indicates. "

Yep. You've unveiled the deep dark Democratic Secret Weapon: Marilou Lopez, a graphic designer from Womans Day Magazine donated $250.00 to the DNC Services Corp. Go ahead. Look it up.

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/media...

(By the way - That's some pretty low-quality brain-food Aggie is reading from these days. It explains a lot.)
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
BAM and BAM!!!!!
BAM, BAM and BAM!!! Back at ya! Another right-wing-whacko attempt at cooking the numbers to support their argument and not revealing their sources.

You guys are SO bad at lying.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#8360 Apr 30, 2013
Oops-Correction: I mistook opensecrets.org for abovetopsecret.com . You know I care about accuracy.

Sorry about the dig at your reading habits, Aggie - Oddly enough it just seemed so likely that you're into bizarre inprobable unproven conspiracy theories. That's more of BigDaves specialty I guess.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8361 Apr 30, 2013
Cartersville Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
It is better than being in only ONE universe...YOURS!!!
Oh, waaaaa waaaaa waaaaa. Take it to the Chaplain. I don't care what you think.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8362 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the link to where your story originated. In fact, at the following link you'll find the actual excel spreadsheet with the list of donors and who they gave to. The number was 65% donated Democratic, not 235 of 255. The study was done by the Center for Responsive Politics.(I'm getting real sick of these "Centers").
" Sixty-five percent of all identified donations went to Democrats, the Center’s research indicates. "
Yep. You've unveiled the deep dark Democratic Secret Weapon: Marilou Lopez, a graphic designer from Womans Day Magazine donated $250.00 to the DNC Services Corp. Go ahead. Look it up.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/media...
(By the way - That's some pretty low-quality brain-food Aggie is reading from these days. It explains a lot.)
<quoted text>
BAM, BAM and BAM!!! Back at ya! Another right-wing-whacko attempt at cooking the numbers to support their argument and not revealing their sources.
You guys are SO bad at lying.
Speaking of low quality brain food, I suggest you examine your diet. You are not referencing the studies I did.

http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/20...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8363 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>

BAM, BAM and BAM!!! Back at ya! Another right-wing-whacko attempt at cooking the numbers to support their argument and not revealing their sources.
You guys are SO bad at lying.
Heck! I'm the one who had to BEG YOU FOR SOURCES. My, how quickly YOU forget.

You support the biggest liar of all. I guess we should take lessons from you libs and Obama. Then we'd be GOOD at lying.* I crack myself up*
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

#8364 Apr 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is a world class liar, so I doubt he would be disappointed. Can you believe what that lying dog said about Benghazi today???? The libs give his lying self a pass every single time. That is why the libs are known as lock step brainless Obamabots.

"A former Justice Department official said unnamed members of the White House administration have threatened whistleblowers who want to speak on the terror attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Victoria Toensing — who also served as a former Republican counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee — is representing one of the State Department workers who claims to have been threatened, Fox News reported.


"“I am talking specifically about Benghazi; that people have been threatened,” she said on a Fox News broadcast.“People have been threatened and not just at the State Department. People have been threatened at the CIA.”

Fox News said at least four careers workers at State and the CIA are preparing to provide Congress with sensitive information about the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012, that killed four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.

Ms. Toensing described the threats to Fox News this way:“It’s frightening, and they’re doing some very despicable threats to people. Not ‘we’re going to kill you,’ or not ‘we’re going to prosecute you tomorrow,’ but they’re taking career people and making them well aware that their careers will be over,” if they cooperate with congressional investigators.""


First off, we have heard before of the thuggery tactics of white house aides cussing, threathening, shouting, pulling their hair out, temper fits, any way to get their way.
Obama runs a school of 10 year old aides.

If the report above is true, it's just another threat as aides have no authority over Congress witnesses.

The report DOES show a white house run amok.
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

#8365 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of low quality brain food, I suggest you examine your diet. You are not referencing the studies I did.
http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/20...

Good post! funny, rofl...

Also good links.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#8366 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of low quality brain food, I suggest you examine your diet. You are not referencing the studies I did.
http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/20...
Interesting that you're referencing the LA Times. Did you know that the biggest propagandists of all, the Koch Brothers want to buy the LA Times to promote their agenda?

This is worth reading:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topofthe...
Informed Opinion

Lehigh Acres, FL

#8367 Apr 30, 2013
Bored wrote:
Not a peep out of libtards......

"Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Tax: The 30 - 35 million Americans who use a pre-tax Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their familyÂ’s basic medical needs face a new Obamacare cap of $2,500. This will squeeze $13 billion of tax money from Americans over the next ten years.(Before Obamacare, the accounts were unlimited under federal law, though employers were allowed to set a cap.) Now, a parent looking to sock away extra money to pay for braces will find themselves quickly hitting this new cap, meaning they would have to pony up some or all of the cost with after-tax dollars.

Needless to say, this tax will especially impact middle class families.

There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. Nationwide there are several million families with special needs children and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C.(National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. This Obamacare tax provision will limit the options available to these families.(Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,388-2,389)"
Right Wingers - what a bunch of sniveling, whining little girls.

Wahhhhh, wahhhhhh, wahhhhhh.

It's fun to watch the freeloading deadbeat Right Wingers puling and crying when they are forced to pay their own way.

Typical parasites - it's not enough they get medical and hospital care, and drugs from the government when they get government Medicare.

They want us taxpayers to give them free medical and hospital care and drugs for free because they are too poor, greedy, or stupid to buy medical insurance before they get their government Medicare.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#8368 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of low quality brain food, I suggest you examine your diet. You are not referencing the studies I did.
http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/20...
We're talking the same study. Your source just cooked the numbers by dollars donated versus percentage of donators on the first source.

Either way - You've exposed it: Womans Day graphic artists prefer Obama.

You know what's interesting? Almost every modern journalist has a degree, if not an advanced degree or two. These highly intelligent people on a whole prefer Democrats. Thanks for pointing that out.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8369 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of low quality brain food, I suggest you examine your diet. You are not referencing the studies I did.
http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/20...
The dems owe the media BIG TIME. The collusion is simply criminal.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8370 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you're referencing the LA Times. Did you know that the biggest propagandists of all, the Koch Brothers want to buy the LA Times to promote their agenda?
This is worth reading:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topofthe...
Oh my gosh!!!!!!!!!! You are IN-SANE! More proof!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8371 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you're referencing the LA Times. Did you know that the biggest propagandists of all, the Koch Brothers want to buy the LA Times to promote their agenda?
This is worth reading:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topofthe...
I posted a VERY TELLING article about Obamacare that was in the Wall Street Journal and you had NO COMMENT whatsoever except to say that I changed the subject. How about commenting on that article? Of course, you will say there is something wrong with WSJ. Once you get past that, how about commenting on the article?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8372 Apr 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Right Wingers - what a bunch of sniveling, whining little girls.
Wahhhhh, wahhhhhh, wahhhhhh.
It's fun to watch the freeloading deadbeat Right Wingers puling and crying when they are forced to pay their own way.
Typical parasites - it's not enough they get medical and hospital care, and drugs from the government when they get government Medicare.
They want us taxpayers to give them free medical and hospital care and drugs for free because they are too poor, greedy, or stupid to buy medical insurance before they get their government Medicare.
You've had a stroke. You libs are the ones who live off the gov'ment. I knew you had loose screws. This post proves it. You voted for Santa Claus now live with it!
Cartersville Resident

Cartersville, GA

#8373 Apr 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, waaaaa waaaaa waaaaa. Take it to the Chaplain. I don't care what you think.
Why is it when someone has put YOU down you come up with the most PATHETIC remarks? Maybe you're just not used to it! Rejection maybe??

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8374 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
We're talking the same study. Your source just cooked the numbers by dollars donated versus percentage of donators on the first source.
Either way - You've exposed it: Womans Day graphic artists prefer Obama.
You know what's interesting? Almost every modern journalist has a degree, if not an advanced degree or two. These highly intelligent people on a whole prefer Democrats. Thanks for pointing that out.
lol HER source COOKED THE NUMBERS. Are you seriously that demented or are you goofing?
The journalists are paid off by the liberal socialist commies therefore their articles are very biased and unreliable.

Your next to last sentence made me laugh out loud. If those same journalists were Republican, you would be screaming how stupid they are. Come on. Quit being so predictible.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8375 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
We're talking the same study. Your source just cooked the numbers by dollars donated versus percentage of donators on the first source.
.
It's a shame that you cannot seem to garner enough information from what you read to see that we are talking about different studies, but it certainly does explain the content of most of your posts.

It is a coincidence that the study you are referencing has the number 235 in it (referring to the total respondents) while the study I referenced had 235 donating to Democrat campaigns OUT OF 255 respondents.

This is from the study you are referring to:
"Hayes is one of 235 people who identified themselves on government documents as journalists, or as working for news organizations, who together have donated more than $469,900 to federal political candidates, committees and parties during the 2010 election cycle, a Center for Responsive Politics analysis indicates. "

This is from one of the two studies I referenced:
"Two-hundred thirty-five journalists donated to Democrats, just 20 gave to Republicans — a margin greater than 10-to-1. An even greater disparity, 20-to-1, exists between the number of journalists who donated to Barack Obama and John McCain."

Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/072308-462103-putti...
Follow us:@IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

Did I make it clear enough for you this time? 235 versus 235+20= 255

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8376 Apr 30, 2013
Cartersville Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it when someone has put YOU down you come up with the most PATHETIC remarks? Maybe you're just not used to it! Rejection maybe??
He's/She's not a regular poster and therefore has no idea about me nor anyone else. I thought my remark was very appropriate for a TROLL. How come you care? So! That person can put me down and I'm supposed to thank him/her? You are seriously warped. I absolutely do not care what a troll says about me. If he/she can't take it. That person shouldn't dish it. Just curious....Why DO you care?????

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#8377 Apr 30, 2013
Cartersville Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it when someone has put YOU down you come up with the most PATHETIC remarks? Maybe you're just not used to it! Rejection maybe??
Oops. I thought Chickenbutt had posted this. My bad.

Let me restate my other reply:

You are not a regular poster. I spoke the truth. If you had been reading these posts for any amount of time, you would know that. As a matter of fact, Chickenbutt has proved it for the past 30 or so minutes. Read on, Cartersville. Unless you are one of the left wingers, you'll see EXACTLY what I mean.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... (Oct '14) 6 min Pete 67,711
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 13 min ICE 222,738
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Nebraska (... (Oct '10) 40 min Zeke the Pinhead 54
Election OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 2 hr WarForOil 83,770
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 2 hr Billy 88,691
Election Who's got your vote in the Ohio Attorney Genera... (Oct '14) 10 hr Circleville Citizen 12
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 18 hr DAN in St Louis 104,065
More from around the web