Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8297 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
I like you Dave, but CB is wiping the floor with your a$$. Bill Gates is brilliant man and you proved it with your link. I'm very impressed Chickn.
Well I guess I was wrong about you. You are not a self thinker and you are not very smart either. I always gave to the benefit of doubt. No more chances for you. I now look at you just as I now look at all the other socialist suckers.
You will reap what you sow.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#8298 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I wish you'd go back to just insulting IO, because you're a dummy.
And the irony of this post, from this poster.

Oh yeah, the one that determines who is above and below others...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8299 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
So essentially you're saying all science is a fraud?
Is that your position now? It would explain a lot.
You continue to put your words in my mouth. I never said any such thing. I did say that you usually try to tell your boss what he wants to hear. I know that there are some people that make results turn out the way people want them too. Not all but some.
When you play golf with the boss you should be smart enough to let him win.
To deny fraud is fraudulent. We are dealing with peole that have certain political causes and people that just want to keep getting government grants. Not too hard to figure out.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8300 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, let's let the source go for a moment. Read what it's talking about. Not ONCE did Bill Gates advocate eliminating mankind. He talked about population control through the use of contraceptives, and he only spoke about that in the context of an equation that showed ONE of several possible numbers had to go down to solve a problem.
No matter. It doesn't come anything close to what you're claiming he said.
However, it shouldn't be difficult to find a transcript of a Bill Gates speech. I couldn't find much mention of it except at your link. Odd, don't you think?
What a pathetic distortion.
Now you say people don't mean what they say. I wouldn't waste my time looking up anything for you. You look it up .I have wasted about all the time that I am going to.
Informed Opinion

Cape Coral, FL

#8301 Apr 30, 2013
Nope- there's no climate change going on. Those glaciers are intentionally melting cause they are "Libtards".

National Geographic News
March 2, 2009
It's an oft-repeated statistic that the glaciers at Montana's Glacier National Park will disappear by the year 2030.

But Daniel Fagre, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist who works at Glacier, says the park's namesakes will be gone about ten years ahead of schedule.

How do you have a Glacier National Park where all the glaciers have done melted ?

The 2030 date, he said, was based on a 2003 USGS study, along with 1992 temperature predictions by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

"Temperature rise in our area was twice as great as what we put into the [1992] model," Fagre said. "What we've been saying now is 2020."

The 2020 estimate is based on aerial surveys and photography Fagre and his team have been conducting at Glacier since the early 1980s.

A more standardized measure of what's happening to a glacier comes from arduous documentation of its mass, which requires—among other techniques—multiple core samples.

Fagre said the 2020 estimate could be slightly revised after his team conducts the mass measurements—hopefully this year—and their computer models are retooled with current temperatures.

Nonpolar ice is disappearing all over the globe, Fagre said. Major glaciers have entirely disappeared from the Andes, and the Himalaya have lost a third of their snow.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8302 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
Dave I hope you feel better dude.
Well thanks and I know I have been very grumpy and not as sharp as I would like to be. I tire easily. But I will be well in no time.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8303 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I second that. Get feeling better Dave.
Thanks man. I am pages behind and I can't catch up. Wow you guys have a lot of time to type.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8304 Apr 30, 2013
Bored wrote:
"
No. In fact, big tornadoes have seen a drop in frequency since the 1950s.“There has been a downward trend in strong (F3) to violent (F5) tornadoes in U.S. since 1950s.” In fact,“warming causes fewer strong tornadoes, not more,” climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer explained.
Other prominent scientists also reject global warming links to tornadoes. There is “no scientific consensus or connection between global warming and tornadic activity,” emphasized Greg Carbin, tornado warning coordination meteorologist at NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma.“NOAA statistics show that the last 60 years have seen a dramatic increase in the reporting of weak tornadoes, but no change in the number of severe to violent ones,” Corbin commented."
++1 Post! You must be commended on all the effort that you put forth on that lengthy post but it will not matter as our liberal posters will just say it really isn't up to snuff. That all your facts are just made up or paid for by the Koch brothers. Only their speaking points are correct. Some have been brainwashed since kids with the lies and that is a hard cycle to break.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8305 Apr 30, 2013
columbus native wrote:
Why are there those who won't accept Global Warming? Mostly republicans who feel their Giant Corporation gods are not responsible for puking all kinds of chemicals in our air that we all breathe. Also they have little regard for protecting our water that we drink. You see their gods will have to spend time and money putting filters on giant smoke stacks and clean up our waterways. Now those sane balanced folks out there believe that business and the enviroment can work together but big business will have to be monitored to see that they don't pull shortcuts and jeporadize all of our health satisfying their Bottom Line( PROFIT). How stupid republicans are!
Normally I dont reply to idiots, but in your case will make an exception.
If you read the above posts you will see I "quoted" (notwithstanding ChickButt's claim of plagiarism) a libtard website about climate change. If you wanna harp on global warming, educate yourself.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8306 Apr 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Right Wingers claim the Earth is flat; it's less than 6,000 years old; and women, when raped, create secret sperm killers in their bloodstream that prevents pregnancy.
vs.
Normal Earth inhabitants say the Earth is spherical; it's about 4 Billion years old; and women, when raped, can become pregnant.
If only their was an impartial, objective methodology to determine the truth.
But, I guess there isn't - so we have to say both sides are equally legitimate viewpoints.
Damn - maybe someday science and rational analysis will be invented on Right Wing Planet.
If you read the posts I made from a libtard website and come away uninformed, you are an idiot. I've always had my suspicion about you.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8307 Apr 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
Nope- there's no climate change going on. Those glaciers are intentionally melting cause they are "Libtards".
National Geographic News
March 2, 2009
It's an oft-repeated statistic that the glaciers at Montana's Glacier National Park will disappear by the year 2030.
But Daniel Fagre, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist who works at Glacier, says the park's namesakes will be gone about ten years ahead of schedule.
How do you have a Glacier National Park where all the glaciers have done melted ?
The 2030 date, he said, was based on a 2003 USGS study, along with 1992 temperature predictions by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
"Temperature rise in our area was twice as great as what we put into the [1992] model," Fagre said. "What we've been saying now is 2020."
The 2020 estimate is based on aerial surveys and photography Fagre and his team have been conducting at Glacier since the early 1980s.
A more standardized measure of what's happening to a glacier comes from arduous documentation of its mass, which requires—among other techniques—multiple core samples.
Fagre said the 2020 estimate could be slightly revised after his team conducts the mass measurements—hopefully this year—and their computer models are retooled with current temperatures.
Nonpolar ice is disappearing all over the globe, Fagre said. Major glaciers have entirely disappeared from the Andes, and the Himalaya have lost a third of their snow.
If the glaciers melt it will be because of you libs hot air. I must be feeling a little better today,huh?
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8308 Apr 30, 2013
These libtards are funny.
I quote a libtard website that debunks what they say and they go into the Doberman mode.
The libtards in this thread are runaways from libtardism, going out on a rotten limb.

Obama would be ashamed of yall, Pelosi also, Reid also, even your dearly beloved socialist party would be ashamed.

Maybe I will just call yall stumpy from now on as your legs have been cut off.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8309 Apr 30, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If the glaciers melt it will be because of you libs hot air. I must be feeling a little better today,huh?

Awwww- he cant help himself, the dummy dont know the Great Lakes were glaciers at one time and they melted also.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8310 Apr 30, 2013
And just to show how the knee jerk reaction now is that EVERYTHING must be connected to global warming, let's turn to CNN's Deb Feyerick's interview with Bill Nye about the close pass of a large asteroid in February.
Feyerick: "Talk about something else that's falling from the sky and that is an asteroid....Is this an effect of, perhaps, of global warming or is this just some meteoric occasion?"
http://theothermccain.com/2013/02/10/cnn-anch...
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#8311 Apr 30, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
You are the one hung up on "global warming." My posts deal with climate change. Sorry you dont know the difference like Chicken little.
Apparently you don't even know what you posted, the term "global warming activists" was a direct quote from your cut and paste extravaganza.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8312 Apr 30, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently you don't even know what you posted, the term "global warming activists" was a direct quote from your cut and paste extravaganza.

And apparently you didnt read all the posts either, the cut and paste also mentioned global climate activists. Why dont you educate us in opinions about the difference since you're so smart. But oh no, that might put a spotlight on you and everyone knows you dont like that.


Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8313 Apr 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
And just to show how the knee jerk reaction now is that EVERYTHING must be connected to global warming, let's turn to CNN's Deb Feyerick's interview with Bill Nye about the close pass of a large asteroid in February.
Feyerick: "Talk about something else that's falling from the sky and that is an asteroid....Is this an effect of, perhaps, of global warming or is this just some meteoric occasion?"
http://theothermccain.com/2013/02/10/cnn-anch...

I've got a water leak in my plumbing, dam that global warming!

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8314 Apr 30, 2013
This is a up to date article about global warming.
It will be my last.I see no sense in beating a dead horse. It shows that only 37% of the scientist now think man is causing any global warming. It is short and sweet. Scientist are being attacked just as I have been for expressing such views.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/...
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8315 Apr 30, 2013

"When asked about second term failures, President Barack Obama responded by saying, "Maybe I should just pack up and go home. Golly.""


Poor old Obama, doncha feel sorry for him.

But then says this...
"Obama pledges renewed push on Gitmo."

"I'm going to go back at this," he said Tuesday. "I've asked my team to review everything that's currently being done in Guantanamo, everything that we can do administratively, and I'm going to re-engage with Congress to try to make the case that this is not something that's in the best interests of the American people."


And this is the same administration that allowed miranda rights to the boston bomber before the 48 hours was up they had promised to let the FBI question him.


And he wonders why he has a failed Presidency.

I say let Biden take over.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8316 Apr 30, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
This is a up to date article about global warming.
It will be my last.I see no sense in beating a dead horse. It shows that only 37% of the scientist now think man is causing any global warming. It is short and sweet. Scientist are being attacked just as I have been for expressing such views.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/...

For some reason I'm never able to open any links to forbes.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 2 min Dalai Lama 96,684
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 11 min AMERICAN SUNSHINE 252,766
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 7 hr Trump WON Get Ove... 107,456
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana... (Oct '10) Nov 28 Chris532008 4,833
Election IN Property Tax Cap Amendment, Public Question 1 (Oct '10) Nov 24 and keep going 1,311
Election Who are you voting for in the Texas Governor race? (Oct '14) Nov 22 dino 158
Election Who do you support for Governor in New York in ... (Oct '10) Nov 22 Positronium 6,483
More from around the web