Old news is old old.<quoted text>
Could that POSSIBLY have any connection to the fact that Bush destroyed the economy and millions of Americans lost their jobs after he tanked the country? Maybe? Any idea how those two things could be related--can you possibly see it?
No? Ok, coming from a person who flat-out claimed that "Bush handed over a pristine economy to Obama", I can see that you may have a problem making a connection.
So how about this?
the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition service for month-by-month figures going back to January 2001. And they show that under President George W. Bush the number of recipients rose by nearly 14.7 million. Nothing before comes close to that.
And under Obama, the increase so far has been 14.2 million. To be exact, the program has so far grown by 444,574 fewer recipients during Obama’s time in office than during Bush’s.
How about this?
The USDA began promoting food stamps with paid radio ads in 2004, under President George W. Bush, and food stamp participation increased 63 percent.
Seeing as most of your posts are bs, why should I believe you on this post.
What's in a ad.
New news is new new.
"Obama Administration Paying People To ‘Recruit’ Folks Onto Food Stamps… Fraud More Than Doubles In 3 Years…$750 million Each Year."