Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
When

Clarkesville, GA

#22445 Aug 18, 2013
"In an op-ed in the Washington Post Wednesday, George Will made the argument that President Obama’s “grandiose claims” for his “presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency.”"

"With a complicit media enabling him by failing to ask tough questions, Will observes that Obama’s presidency is marked by a “pantry of excuses for failure,” a “nonexistent domestic agenda,” a “foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and red lines,” and, most recently on display, an offering of “inconvenience as a justification for illegality.” "

The man can cut to the bone, and is correct about Obama the muslim president.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
When

Clarkesville, GA

#22446 Aug 18, 2013
This is why we demand to own guns....


"Woman with Concealed Carry Handgun Stops Six Robbers at Houston Denny's"

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

When

Clarkesville, GA

#22447 Aug 18, 2013
This is why the Fat boy will NOT be president....


"Gov. Christie Wants Firearms ID Card for Purchase of All Ammunition"

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

When

Clarkesville, GA

#22448 Aug 18, 2013
Navigators for obamacare are raiding the treasury left and right. And some are Obamas favorite people.

"Urban League Bags $565,000 In Obamacare Cash"

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Dahlonega, GA

#22449 Aug 18, 2013
white wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution believe it or not has been modified greatly over the years. Our forefathers who wrote the darn thing also include ways to update it, and we have many times. But the question I have for you which in your opinion which is of greater public value, the Constitution, or the Bible?? Folks like you love to pick and chose which document you use when trying to justify your actions. Jesus was and is kind and loving, teaching and feeding the poor was a thing he did. Now all of a sudden according to conservative's its a bad thing especially if they ain't white,
Jesus was not white.
The question being asked of IO is very simple, and there is no need for you to even begin to question me as you have. IO made a statement, totally inane, and he has been called on it. He needs to answer that question, or retract his statement and admit the error of his ways.

As far as your questions of me, they are irrelevant to this topic. But you open up yourself to be asked; What conservatives say "it's a bad thing", and why do you bring race into it?
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

#22450 Aug 18, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Was there an actual threat posed by the Soviet Union as it purposely tried (and succeeded) to infiltrate many layers of our society from the entertainment industry up to our government in order to both influence public opinion and ferret out military and scientific secrets and influence governmental decisions - undeniably Yes.
Oooooooh,
"infiltrate many layers of our society"

Oooooooh,
"influence public opinion"

Subversives are all around us, we all KNOW who they are.

Yep,
if your message is so weak,
you've got to control the playing field.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Dahlonega, GA

#22451 Aug 18, 2013
When wrote:
"In an op-ed in the Washington Post Wednesday, George Will made the argument that President Obama’s “grandiose claims” for his “presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency.”"
"With a complicit media enabling him by failing to ask tough questions, Will observes that Obama’s presidency is marked by a “pantry of excuses for failure,” a “nonexistent domestic agenda,” a “foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and red lines,” and, most recently on display, an offering of “inconvenience as a justification for illegality.” "
The man can cut to the bone, and is correct about Obama the muslim president.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
nobama has never had any interest in being POTUS. To him it is no more than a tool to be used to further a political, and economical revolution, from within.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Dahlonega, GA

#22452 Aug 18, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

if your message is so weak,
you've got to control the playing field.
nobama to the core, good job.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Dahlonega, GA

#22453 Aug 18, 2013

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Dahlonega, GA

#22454 Aug 18, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

- In fact, it's illegal for the federal government to discriminate against someone who is a communist;
Is that in the Constitution?
nothing is

Dahlonega, GA

#22455 Aug 18, 2013
You might just want to grab a history book instead of depending on some of the whacko web sites you frequent. Our forefathers had no idea what or if there was or would ever be a Communist. Wish I was surprised by your post, but not at all.

Read this article about how the RNC is going to boycott a couple of news outlets because they are either running or their companies are producing historical tv shows about a couple of people who have been important to the country and in the public eye for many years. They are going to boycott them if they continue. All the while FNC is backed by funding from the RNC and 3/4 the people on air either are with the RNC, worked for Bush or wish they were. And the real kicker FOX may actually produce one of the shows! If that's not proof Murdock is in it for the money and has no moral path to follow, nothing is.

http://news.msn.com/us/gop-set-to-boycott-deb...
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#22456 Aug 18, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>And what this all boils down to is a confirmation of my post that stated:

"... that both socialism and communism are a mix of both economic systems and political systems. The very nature of both socialism and communism requires a certain type of political system for them to be enacted."
Let's review:

You said it's illegal to be a communist - the evidence conclusively proves it's not.
and
You said you had to register with the government if you were a communist - the evidence conclusively proves you don't.

You said that socialism and communism require a "certain" type of political structure/government -and the evidence proves that's not true either.

America is a "mixed economy", consisting of:
regulated capitalism,(although the people are losing the ability to regulate), and
socialism,(although we are fragmenting apart as personal greed is valued over collective good).

The only hope we have, so far, is that we have incorporated enough socialistic programs and enough regulation to prevent the complete accumulation of all wealth in the hands of our Oligarchy.

But, as Warren Buffet said - "There is a class war, and "We" ( the top 1%), are winning."

Denmark is socialist - and far more democratic than America. The key isn't their democracy - the key is their distribution of wealth.

Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship - and extraordinarily capitalistic. The key isn't the fact of the dictatorship - the key is the distribution of their wealth.

Socialism encourages the reasonable distribution of wealth, but fails to account for need to incorporate personal self-interest as a motivating factor.

Capitalism accounts for the motivating power of self-interest, but fails to account for the need to incorporate the needs of the group or country.

That's why only mixed economies, part socialist and part capitalistic ever succeed in the long-term.

In America - we are living proof that unregulated capitalism leads to oligarchy and tyranny.

The 1% in America long ago understood that the way to keep and grow their wealth was to seize political power.

Just like America is ruled by the 1%, Oligarchy - so is Russia.

Anyone who studied the issue understands that Russia became capitalist because the ruling 1% in Russia determined that "communism" interfered with their ability to wrest ownership of all wealth into their personal hands .

That damn "communism" interfered with the ability of a few to own everything - so they elected to become "capitalist" so the powerful could distribute the wealth amongst themselves.

Why have political power unless you enjoy the wealth ?

I recently met a Russian Billionaire who used to be a Communist Party member who hated communism because it prevented his accumulation of wealth - he understood that real power accompanies real wealth. Who runs the government isn't important because whoever they are, they subject to influence, and nothing influences more than wealth.

Americans need to grow up and join the rest of the world in reality. The rest of the world understands that the "Golden" Rule
- "Them that has the gold - rule"

Always, always, always follow the money.

Alleged capitalism communism, socialism, etc. are just shiny objects we average people are supposed to argue over, while the 1% steal the money.
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#22457 Aug 18, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I have no place in Islam, and you have no place in America. You have the right to leave. Saudi Arabia can fund the Egyptians. We have no place to get involved, when muslims are fighting muslims. Unless, they start killing Christians, which they have. So..... I think if I would have to decide whether not, to keep funding the Egyptian military. It would be on that basis and I would continue to fund the Egyptian army, on one condition. And that one condition being, that the persecution of Christians and/or Jews, STOPS, or the money STOPS. PERIOD.
If that post makes sense to you - go back to bed and sleep it off.

You don't need to leave America - it left you - sometime around 1964.

Don't send my kids to die in Egypt to protect Egyptian Muslims,(Shia or Sunni), Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Wicca, or those who worship those little mints hotels leave on your pillow.

Don't send our taxpayers' money, or borrow more that taxpayers have to repay to protect Egyptian Muslims,(Shia or Sunni), Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Wicca, or those who worship those little mints hotels leave on your pillow.

Until we have a balanced budget and have paid off the costs of Right Wing Wackos' Iraq War - don't send a dime, or one Marine, to the Mid-East for anything, any time, any where.

But hey... There's profit to be made - so Right Wingers will do like they always do ... send money, guns, and advisors... and bill the taxpayer.
When

Clarkesville, GA

#22458 Aug 18, 2013
nothing is wrote:
You might just want to grab a history book instead of depending on some of the whacko web sites you frequent. Our forefathers had no idea what or if there was or would ever be a Communist. Wish I was surprised by your post, but not at all.
Read this article about how the RNC is going to boycott a couple of news outlets because they are either running or their companies are producing historical tv shows about a couple of people who have been important to the country and in the public eye for many years. They are going to boycott them if they continue. All the while FNC is backed by funding from the RNC and 3/4 the people on air either are with the RNC, worked for Bush or wish they were. And the real kicker FOX may actually produce one of the shows! If that's not proof Murdock is in it for the money and has no moral path to follow, nothing is.
http://news.msn.com/us/gop-set-to-boycott-deb...

Best thing the RNC can do, boycott the libroid news media.

Fox News is the best ugly eve.


guest

United States

#22459 Aug 18, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
nobama has never had any interest in being POTUS. To him it is no more than a tool to be used to further a political, and economical revolution, from within.
ROFLMAO - Pathetic and unfounded paranoia. That sounds like it's straight out of the glen beck playbook.
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#22460 Aug 18, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO - Pathetic and unfounded paranoia. That sounds like it's straight out of the glen beck playbook.
Isn't it amazing how they hate Obama, when for all practical purposes, he is simply a slightly less Wacko Bush ?

Why would they love the disaster that was Bush, and hate the relatively tremendous success that is Obama ?

Let's see...

Why would an author who adopts the screenname "Gen. Robert E. Lee" so vehemently and illogically detest Obama, a slightly more tanned version of his own hero Bush ?

Hmmmmmmmm ?

No. That couldn't be, could it ?
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#22461 Aug 18, 2013
Hey..

Good going Rand Paul - when you're right - you're right.

Rand Paul: NSA Spying 'Unconstitutional,' Can't Be Saved By More Oversight

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) called for congressional hearings on the National Security Agency's data collection on Sunday, while saying that much of the program is unconstitutional and likely can't be improved by oversight.

"You know, I think it would be better with more oversight, but there are some things they are doing that I fundamentally think are unconstitutional," Paul said on "Fox News Sunday."

"Our founding fathers, when they wrote the Fourth Amendment, said a single warrant goes toward a specific individual and what you want to look for.... The constitution doesn't allow for a single warrant to get a billion phone records.... They basically, I believe, are looking at all of the cell phone calls in America every day."

Paul, who has become one of the most vocal critics of the NSA's surveillance program, also lamented the one-sided nature of the discussion on the issue. He accused the president -- a former constitutional law professor -- of ignorance about the U.S. Constitution.

"You know, I think the president fundamentally missunderstands the constitutional separation of powers," he said.

"Because the checks and balances are supposed to come from independent branches of government. So he thinks that if he gets some lawyers together from the NSA and they do a Power Point presentation and tell him everything is okay, that the NSA can police themselves. But one of the fundamental things that our founders put in place was they wanted to separate police power from the judiciary power."

But the following week, the Washington Post revealed that the NSA had "broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents."

The chief judge on the FISC, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton, has also admitted that the court's oversight powers are limited.

“The FISC is forced to rely upon the accuracy of the information that is provided to the Court,” Walton said in a statement to the Post.“The FISC does not have the capacity to investigate issues of noncompliance, and in that respect the FISC is in the same position as any other court when it comes to enforcing [government] compliance with its orders.”

Paul added on Sunday that he would like to see the Supreme Court take up the issue of the NSA's spying program.

"So I think the constitutionality of these programs need to be questioned," Paul said, "and there needs to be a Supreme Court decision looking at whether what they're doing is constitutional or not."

Not to be outdone - Right Wing Wacko King had to say something stupid.

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), who also appeared on "Fox News Sunday," defended the NSA.

"I fully disagree with what Sen. Rand Paul said," King stated. "That was just a grab bag of misinformation and distortion.... And this whole tone of snooping and spying that we use, I think it's horrible. It's really a distortion and a smear and a slander of good, patriotic Americans."

King - what a moron.

God Bless you Manning, Snowden and Greenwald - the true patriots and defenders of the Constitution.
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

#22463 Aug 18, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
nobama has never had any interest in being POTUS. To him it is no more than a tool to be used to further a political, and economical revolution, from within.
Oooooooh,
Subversives are all around us, we all KNOW who they are.
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

#22464 Aug 18, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Is that in the Constitution?
Yep,
the very First Amendment,
you should read it sometime.
Oh my

Young Harris, GA

#22465 Aug 18, 2013
When wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Best thing the RNC can do, boycott the libroid news media.
Fox News is the best ugly eve.
Yep,
circle the wagons,
purge to purify.

Please,
move more to the right.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Citizen Sound-Off Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election Who's got your vote in the Tennessee Senate rac... (Oct '14) 3 min NTMD8OR 23,145
Election Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 4 min bacon hater 81,756
Election OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Questio... (Oct '10) 39 min WarForOil 83,227
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 hr RayOne 194,092
Election Kansas Right to Bear Arms Question, Constitutio... (Oct '10) 2 hr Birthdaycakeshake 6,077
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Kentucky (... (Oct '10) Aug 31 opinion 723
Election Who's got your vote in the New Mexico State Com... (Nov '14) Aug 30 These 3
More from around the web