After Supreme Court term, line betwee...

After Supreme Court term, line between - liberal' and - conservative' is b

There are 4 comments on the The Washington Post story from Jun 30, 2012, titled After Supreme Court term, line between - liberal' and - conservative' is b. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

When Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined with the court's liberal justices to uphold President Obama's health-care law , it was historic in more ways than one: It was only the second time in his seven years on the court that he provided the winning vote for the left to prevail over the conservative justices.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

“It's Time to Defeat Terrorism ”

Since: May 11

NYC

#1 Jun 30, 2012
Clearly, The Supreme Court betrayed the American people and the American constitution that it was sworn to protect by caving in to pressure by the Obama regime that seek the trashing of US Constitution. Most American states will stand up to the Obama communist dictator regime and will not cooperate in trashing the American constitution and denying the freedom and liberty of every American. Obama is assuming that the American people are so naive and ignorant that they will never realize that their constitution, freedom and liberty were trashed by the sold-out Roberts who caved in to Obama furious threats. However, very soon American will start to see that they lost their freedom to communist dictator liar named Obama who is pushing foreign agenda on the ruins of America. The same dictator Obama who lied and deceive the American people about his health scam claiming that it is not a tax continue his demagogueries that will bring to his defeat in November. Clearly, Roberts betrayed the American people and the American constitution claiming that even Obama health law mandate is not constitutional according to Commerce Clause he will re-write it to make it acceptable. However, in order to appease Obama who called him” activist judge” Roberts re-wrote the Obama law as if it was a ‘tax’ in a way that Congress never intended to write or approve because “Congress has the right to levy taxes as it wishes without limit”. The Supreme Court caved to the pressure from Obama who was furious if his law would be stricken down unconstitutional as the four judges claimed. Why should Roberts be allowed to subject the American people with unlimited taxes to comply with Obama regime rule when the Boston tea party was about unjust taxes by the British government? Who gave Roberts the right to re-write the Obama health care as tax?
opps I did it again

Mcallen, TX

#2 Jun 30, 2012
Jeff Brightone wrote:
Clearly, The Supreme Court betrayed the American people and the American constitution that it was sworn to protect by caving in to pressure by the Obama regime that seek the trashing of US Constitution. Most American states will stand up to the Obama communist dictator regime and will not cooperate in trashing the American constitution and denying the freedom and liberty of every American. Obama is assuming that the American people are so naive and ignorant that they will never realize that their constitution, freedom and liberty were trashed by the sold-out Roberts who caved in to Obama furious threats. However, very soon American will start to see that they lost their freedom to communist dictator liar named Obama who is pushing foreign agenda on the ruins of America. The same dictator Obama who lied and deceive the American people about his health scam claiming that it is not a tax continue his demagogueries that will bring to his defeat in November. Clearly, Roberts betrayed the American people and the American constitution claiming that even Obama health law mandate is not constitutional according to Commerce Clause he will re-write it to make it acceptable. However, in order to appease Obama who called him” activist judge” Roberts re-wrote the Obama law as if it was a ‘tax’ in a way that Congress never intended to write or approve because “Congress has the right to levy taxes as it wishes without limit”. The Supreme Court caved to the pressure from Obama who was furious if his law would be stricken down unconstitutional as the four judges claimed. Why should Roberts be allowed to subject the American people with unlimited taxes to comply with Obama regime rule when the Boston tea party was about unjust taxes by the British government? Who gave Roberts the right to re-write the Obama health care as tax?
Very well said!! Thank you!

“Work hard at work worth doing.”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#3 Jul 1, 2012
Roberts achieved one very important thing,exposing the fact that the mandate was a tax. Obama swore it would not be a tax...he exposed BO's lie. Maybe this was done intentionally, who knows? Roberts may have the last laugh, when this backfires on BO.
You are

Huntsville, AL

#4 Jul 1, 2012
teddyr4me wrote:
Roberts achieved one very important thing,exposing the fact that the mandate was a tax. Obama swore it would not be a tax...he exposed BO's lie. Maybe this was done intentionally, who knows? Roberts may have the last laugh, when this backfires on BO.
the liar here. This was a penalty and explicitly not a tax. Most reasonable people and jusrists who are halfway familiar with the legal precedents would have found it legal under the commerce clause. Roberts decided to interpret it as a tax, but that doesn't make it so. If you pay attention to the other decisions of this court, you'd know they have their own reality.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Supreme Court Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The fight to confirm Donald Trump's Supreme Cou... (Nov '16) Jun 15 Wealth Management 21
News Supreme Court appears favorable to Secret Servi... (Mar '12) Jun 1 Grecian Formula 3... 24
News Supreme Court strikes down 2 NC congressional d... May '17 RMG Reymundo Meji... 4
News Clint Eastwood backs gay marriage in Supreme Co... (Mar '13) May '17 Norwegian Supremacy 73
News Another ObamaCare challenge heads to the Suprem... (Oct '15) May '17 Bogus Repeal 36
News Supreme Court clears the way for cities, includ... May '17 Pro and Con 1
News Supreme Court lets stand California ban on anti... May '17 Xstain Spot Remover 1
More from around the web