Supreme Court to consider limits on individual political contributions

There are 3 comments on the Feb 19, 2013, Washington Post story titled Supreme Court to consider limits on individual political contributions. In it, Washington Post reports that:

The Supreme Court reentered the controversial field of campaign finance Tuesday, agreeing to consider a Republican challenge to decades-old limits on the total amount a person can contribute to candidates, political parties and political action committees.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Post.

Patriot

Boulder, CO

#1 Feb 19, 2013
The Codex position on GM food as well as vitamin and mineral supplements will be used to develop a food system in which GM food is the only acceptable form of food allowed in the supply. In addition, it is entirely possible that once the standards are set by Codex and agreed upon by nations participating in the WTO, that foods containing high levels (or reasonable levels) of nutrition could be removed from the market simply on the basis of their high nutritional content.

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/02/codex-ali...

----

GMO A Go Go - Truth about GMOs explained in new animated cartoon

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp...
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#2 Feb 19, 2013
re-pubic-lick-uns were happy with the 2010 Supreme Court to let the money dogs out, thinking they could outspend dems, especially if re-pubic-lick-uns could force union political financing to stop. However, re-pubic-lick-uns found out that more money than they could corral was out there. Plus, re-pubic-lick-uns couldn't fight growing minorities & women (who just wouldn't vote for white men).

So re-pubic-lick-uns, after finding out their political money was no good, want to go back to the old finance ways & need to ride the coattails of the Supreme Court back into power.

I'm glad re-pubic-lick-uns still haven't figured out how they lost the last two elections. re-pubic-lick-uns, an ever decreasing percentage of americans, are setting themselves up to lose 4 presidential elections in a row........ if not more!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#3 Feb 19, 2013
consider do they? lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Supreme Court Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay marriage pioneer, free from skeptics, prepa... Fri Hasaun Lee 1
News Same-sex marriage opponents urge Supreme Court ... Apr 23 Mikey 98
News Supreme Court upholds North Carolina's new limi... (Oct '14) Apr 21 LAVON AFFAIr 6
News Supreme Court: Medicaid Providers Can't Sue Sta... Apr 2 dar 2
News Supreme Court rules against Alabama redistricti... Mar '15 Go Blue Forever 2
News Alabama Supreme Court halts same-sex marriage Mar '15 Khatru 66
Fight over attorneys fees reaches Supreme Court Feb '15 Patriot8251 1
More from around the web