Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee
There are 1 comment on the The Washington Post story from May 21, 2012, titled Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee. In it, The Washington Post reports that:The high court ruled Monday that Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. did not deserve to get $5,517.20 in compensation for interpreters for fighting off a lawsuit from a Japanese professional baseball player.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.
“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”
Since: Mar 11
Rockin' USA ;)
#1 May 21, 2012
HOW THE FREAK can ya put a dollar amount on anything really..Some folks think their education merits warrant them for a higher paying job..afterall they have a degree...all about supply and demand. EVERYONE knows that every language has different meanings for word used in their vocabulary. The ruling has passed..let it be..now run and play..
Add your comments below
|Baker wants US Supreme Court to hear gay weddin...||Sat||davy||10|
|Another ObamaCare challenge heads to the Suprem... (Oct '15)||Jul 20||Bama Yankee||29|
|How the Supreme Court's immigration decision hu...||Jul 2||Nopal||8|
|Transgender bathroom case may go to Supreme Court||Jun '16||nanoanomaly||1|
|Gay marriage victory at Supreme Court triggerin...||Jun '16||WasteWater||85|
|Time for atheist on Supreme Court? (Apr '10)||Jun '16||Happy Old Geezer||46|
|Choose carefully: The next president could shap...||Apr '16||Le Jimbo||45|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories - Supreme Court Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC