Supreme Court says interpretation and...

Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee

There are 1 comment on the The Washington Post story from May 21, 2012, titled Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

The high court ruled Monday that Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. did not deserve to get $5,517.20 in compensation for interpreters for fighting off a lawsuit from a Japanese professional baseball player.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.


Since: Mar 11

Rockin' USA ;)

#1 May 21, 2012
HOW THE FREAK can ya put a dollar amount on anything really..Some folks think their education merits warrant them for a higher paying job..afterall they have a degree...all about supply and demand. EVERYONE knows that every language has different meanings for word used in their vocabulary. The ruling has passed..let it run and play..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Supreme Court Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Baker wants US Supreme Court to hear gay weddin... Sat davy 10
News Another ObamaCare challenge heads to the Suprem... (Oct '15) Jul 20 Bama Yankee 29
News How the Supreme Court's immigration decision hu... Jul 2 Nopal 8
News Transgender bathroom case may go to Supreme Court Jun '16 nanoanomaly 1
News Gay marriage victory at Supreme Court triggerin... Jun '16 WasteWater 85
News Time for atheist on Supreme Court? (Apr '10) Jun '16 Happy Old Geezer 46
News Choose carefully: The next president could shap... Apr '16 Le Jimbo 45
More from around the web