There is no middle ground on this one because if the Supreme Court says it fails to grant the federal lawmaking process this right then Social Security, MediCare, MedicAid,and state mandates to buy auto insurance are ALL challengeable under that sort of ruling. So it is going to either a RADICAL CHANGE in the law or maintaining the status quo in allowing that right to the federal lawmaking process. We'll see!!
No auto insurance is a different horse. What the health care plan does is require a person to pay for goods & services that they did not personally order. A far a social security & medi care those are ponzi schemes and are probably unconstitional as well. Medicade & SSI is welfare those folks never paid in to social security.
Tell me when this thread is updated:
|Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares fo...||4 min||Pietro Armando||1,447|
|Supreme Court to weigh in on legislative prayers||May 20||isuggest||1|
|Supreme Court acting serene with unanimous ruli...||May 13||snyper||1|
|Supreme Court sides with Monsanto in patent case||May 13||FFS-||1|
|Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn Californi...||May 8||Get That Fool||1,538|
|Michigan Supreme Court ruling continues domesti...||May 2||imaginaryfriend||1|
|Obama asks Supreme Court to uphold recess appoi...||Apr 25||shinningelectr0n||1|