Supreme Court Sides With Landowner in Rails-to-Trails Case

There are 2 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 10, 2014, titled Supreme Court Sides With Landowner in Rails-to-Trails Case. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday the federal government has no claim to rights of way that railroads abandon after receiving them from Congress-a victory for property owners that could undermine plans for a nationwide network of recreational trails.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.


Bellingham, WA

#1 Mar 10, 2014
On the other hand, a oil pipeline company can lay pipe
across your property and you can't say anything
about it. What do the Supremes have to say about that?
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#3 Mar 11, 2014
But the feds can force the landowners to clean the trails and then use eminent domain. That will teach those greedy corporate b'stards.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Supreme Court Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay marriage foe's argument seems to leave Supr... 3 hr Aspirin Between M... 226
News Gay marriage pioneer, free from skeptics, prepa... Apr 27 giangtrantruong89 2
News Same-sex marriage opponents urge Supreme Court ... Apr 23 Mikey 98
News Supreme Court upholds North Carolina's new limi... (Oct '14) Apr 21 LAVON AFFAIr 6
News Supreme Court: Medicaid Providers Can't Sue Sta... Apr '15 dar 2
News Supreme Court rules against Alabama redistricti... Mar '15 Go Blue Forever 2
News Alabama Supreme Court halts same-sex marriage Mar '15 Khatru 66
More from around the web