Marcus: Supreme Court may not protect...

Marcus: Supreme Court may not protect Obamacare this time

There are 1 comment on the The Washington Post story from Jul 24, 2014, titled Marcus: Supreme Court may not protect Obamacare this time. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

The question is enormously important: Are health-care consumers entitled to subsidies if they buy coverage on insurance exchanges established by the federal government, as they are with insurance from state exchanges? Ruth Marcus is a columnist and editorial writer for The Post, specializing in American politics and domestic policy.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Tea Party Supporter

Huntsville, AL

#1 Jul 24, 2014
Waste of time an money to keep fighting this thing,but repuklicans have to feed the base an act like they are doing something

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Supreme Court Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News School board, sued by transgender student, asks... Sep '16 Mr Coach 55
News 'Sister Wives' appeal polygamy ruling to US Sup... Sep '16 WeTheSheeple 11
News Another ObamaCare challenge heads to the Suprem... (Oct '15) Sep '16 Swedenforever of ... 30
News Baker wants US Supreme Court to hear gay weddin... Jul '16 davy 10
News How the Supreme Court's immigration decision hu... Jul '16 Nopal 8
News Transgender bathroom case may go to Supreme Court Jun '16 nanoanomaly 1
News Gay marriage victory at Supreme Court triggerin... Jun '16 WasteWater 77
More from around the web