Supreme Court Disallows Protest on Air Force Base
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.
#1 Feb 27, 2014
A public road running through.
Doesn't sound very public.
#2 Feb 27, 2014
The First Amendment allows protests, but does not give an unrestricted right to demonstrate just anyplace. I think the Supreme Court was correct in the way it decided the case, considering the public interest in maintaining secure military bases.
Military settings have always in the U.S. had far more restrictive rules than civilian ones. For example, several hundred years ago, when it was difficult to live in remote forts in U.S. territories on account of the danger, boredom and miserable living conditions, soldiers who went AWOL faced summary trials and executions. The military officials in charge of those places imposed rigid rules and expected them to be followed.
No doubt the Supreme Court today would uphold the right to protest peacefully today in most civilian settings where demonstrators comply with the law.
#3 Feb 28, 2014
Add your comments below
|How a county clerk is refusing to issue gay mar...||16 min||Noracecard||3|
|Kentucky clerk defies Supreme Court same-sex ma...||58 min||Mac Daddy||1|
|Supreme Court smacks EPA for ignoring costs, bu...||Aug 23||ima-Ilis Myka Ash...||8|
|Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares fo... (Mar '13)||Aug 23||2015 Shemitah||1,581|
|Doug Wilder blasts McAuliffe on handling of Sup...||Aug 13||Boll Weevil McAul...||1|
|Supreme Court will hear Allentown's appeal in d...||Jul '15||silly rabbit||7|
|Inside Ted Cruz's new war on the Supreme Court||Jul '15||Le Jimbo||12|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories - Supreme Court Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC