Supreme Court Disallows Protest on Air Force Base
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.
#1 Feb 27, 2014
A public road running through.
Doesn't sound very public.
#2 Feb 27, 2014
The First Amendment allows protests, but does not give an unrestricted right to demonstrate just anyplace. I think the Supreme Court was correct in the way it decided the case, considering the public interest in maintaining secure military bases.
Military settings have always in the U.S. had far more restrictive rules than civilian ones. For example, several hundred years ago, when it was difficult to live in remote forts in U.S. territories on account of the danger, boredom and miserable living conditions, soldiers who went AWOL faced summary trials and executions. The military officials in charge of those places imposed rigid rules and expected them to be followed.
No doubt the Supreme Court today would uphold the right to protest peacefully today in most civilian settings where demonstrators comply with the law.
#3 Feb 28, 2014
Add your comments below
|Apple, Google, Facebook and Uber urge Supreme C...||Oct 13||Fredrick||4|
|Supreme Court ponders if lawyer can concede cli...||Oct 9||Jeeshush Sheeeria||2|
|It will be momentous': Supreme Court embarking ...||Oct 3||Fundie Sniffling||8|
|Supreme Court appears favorable to Secret Servi... (Mar '12)||Oct 3||Janice||27|
|Supreme Court conservatives on rise as importan...||Oct 1||Tomas||1|
|Trump lawyers urge Supreme Court to rule for Co...||Sep '17||Wondering||47|
|Another ObamaCare challenge heads to the Suprem... (Oct '15)||Aug '17||swedenforever||37|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories - Supreme Court Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC