Joldy

Holland, MI

#1 Jul 10, 2010
Why weren't the relief wells designed to intersect the riser pipe one or two hundred feet below the blowout prevent? That could have been done in a week. Why do they have to intersect the riser pipe 16,000 feet down, which takes months? There must be a good reason, but I have not heard it yet.
Anon

AOL

#2 Jul 10, 2010
Joldy wrote:
Why weren't the relief wells designed to intersect the riser pipe one or two hundred feet below the blowout prevent? That could have been done in a week. Why do they have to intersect the riser pipe 16,000 feet down, which takes months? There must be a good reason, but I have not heard it yet.
There may not be any integral functional piping left, below the surface, by now. Partly due to earlier back over-pressure cracks and constant high pressure uncontrolled flowing (abrasive internal wearing away).

They also have to go well below where most of the underground leaks may be. Also, to intersect the cased wellbore is not easy straight-line drilling. It would have been a surer effort if more than two relief wells had been initiated (two is very limited--although better than a single "one-shot" gamble).
Anon

AOL

#3 Jul 12, 2010
Anon wrote:
<quoted text>
There may not be any integral functional piping left, below the surface, by now. Partly due to earlier back over-pressure cracks and constant high pressure uncontrolled flowing (abrasive internal wearing away).
They also have to go well below where most of the underground leaks may be. Also, to intersect the cased wellbore is not easy straight-line drilling. It would have been a surer effort if more than two relief wells had been initiated (two is very limited--although better than a single "one-shot" gamble).
"Cruising altitude" height oil-drilling--in other words, looking for oil at approximately +30,000 feet deep (+9.144 metres)--through mostly granite rock strata, with a one mile deep ocean depth over the field's strata, on a GPS-controlled (impossible to anchor) platform. For a 30 year's supply of crude (or possibly hydrocarbon pollution). WITH SCIENTIST A YEAR EARLIER, WARNING THE U.S. Federal Government that it was an extremely high-risk venture!

The best stupid government that money can buy (BP's purchase).

The Russians have drilled super-deep wells over 350 times now--but never over high-risk difficult to control deep-ocean conditions.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Oil Spill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Yellowstone River oil spill: Fresh water is tak... Jan '15 public at risk 2
News Oil Spill Contaminates Montana Town's Water, EP... Jan '15 discuss locally 1
News How the Ebola crisis is like the BP oil spill (Oct '14) Oct '14 Jeff Brightone 1
Texas Oil Spill (Mar '14) Mar '14 Roblogger 1
News Crews clean up Texas oil spill, dozens ships st... (Mar '14) Mar '14 imagine a world 1
News Trial over BP's Gulf oil spill focuses on compa... (Oct '13) Oct '13 swim 1
News Critics slam Thai energy giant for inefficient ... (Aug '13) Aug '13 chisholm 1
More from around the web