Gunman dead, 1 teacher wounded in elementary school shooting in Conn.

[Village Mystery]

yup wrote:

<quoted text>
Not hardly. Many amendments over 200 years and supreme court interpretations over same 200 years makes it obvious that it is the living, breathing, changing document that progressives say it is. You right wingers love to disagree with the parts you don’t happen to like. Interpretation works different ways – but court decisions stand. Obamacare is a great example. Roe v. Wade another. Next up – long overdue serious gun law revisions. Deal with it - it's coming whether you like it or not.

That's no surprise as more and more people are trained to respond to every single thing that they see on their TV sets with an expansion of government power. It really doesn't matter what it is does it? The "solution" always involves handing power over to the government. I would ask why but no one will answer honestly.

How could anyone "like it" when the dominant political movement in the country offers NOTHING to society of any value. Not one thing. Watching the most pathetic who are of no benefit to anyone except government cede power? What's to like?

[J_a_n]

Pictures of these youngsters, so sad. God Bless them in their new home.

http://conservativepapers.com/news/2012/12/15...

[serfs up]

yup wrote:

<quoted text>
No idiot – Obamacare was upheld because the chief justice of the USSC – a known and reliable conservative – sided with the liberal wing of the court because he was actually that concerned with the legacy of the court and its hard right turn on many decisions over the last decade +. It was a “make up” pass interference call in favor of the team that was getting screwed by the officials for most of the game.
It won’t be a constitutional amendment that changes the gun culture – it will be city and state laws and federal enforcement of laws on transporting guns across state lines. They've wasted billions on the absurd “war on drugs” since Nixon was in office – had we spent a fraction of that on sensible gun laws and enforcement – a lot of dead folks would still be here.

The chief justice is another new world order hack that showed his true colors when all of us needed him. Just another institution to not trust anymore. Why you pure progressives are bitter I don't know. The end result is you will get what you want. Then you will get what you wrought. By your hands. These tragic events have happened in in our history. But at much less levels then we see the last few decades. You know, when the political correctness, diversity, feminism and the rest was instituted into laws and then when achieved your leaders went into overdrive like some drug induced junkies with an endless line of credit. Perhaps you should look what changes we made in our culture before you blame anyone else who did nothing wrong except follow the right to have protection.

[Anonymous]

"Among the heroic survivors of the Connecticut school shooting was a first-grade teacher who, after locking her students safely in a bathroom, told them she loved them — in case those were the last words they ever heard."

I laugh when they try to make people look as if they were heros when we have no idea how things really happened.

They did the same thing on 9/11.

[Village Mystery]

J_a_n wrote:

Pictures of these youngsters, so sad. God Bless them in their new home.
http://conservativepapers.com/news/2012/12/15...

It's unbearable to look at those pictures or to try and consider what the parents and loved ones of those killed are going through.

[barefoot2626]

Vance1 wrote:

<quoted text>
why because of them only having flint lock pistols in 1776?!

The shooter's mother was one of yours, Vince.

Something you tea baggers can be proud of.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Being bored to death by liberal psycho babble is not a natural death either.

Wipe your chin, Donglicker, you are dribbling on the rug again.

[barefoot2626]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

Tragic as this shooting was, I am NOT going to give up my constitutional rights because some whacko flipped out.

Americans aren't going to put up with your crap anymore. You don't have the right to expose us to your toys because you suffer from tiny dick syndrome.

The shooter's mom: gun nutter.

The tragedy here is she isn't alive to see what she bred by having an arsenal to inflict on the first graders and the parents and family of Sandy Hook.

[barefoot2626]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
That's the whole point- more or less gun laws will make ZERO difference in shootings like this.

Americans are tired of you tiny-dicked p* and your toys that we have to be exposed to.

The mother gun nut exposed this psychotic to her gun and gun nutter lifestyle and provided the assault weapon used to kill these children.

[zef]

Anonymous wrote:

"Among the heroic survivors of the Connecticut school shooting was a first-grade teacher who, after locking her students safely in a bathroom, told them she loved them — in case those were the last words they ever heard."
I laugh when they try to make people look as if they were heros when we have no idea how things really happened.
They did the same thing on 9/11.

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>No one is forced is have one of those apparatuses. You gave informed consent. If you didn't, you can sue. You're on the wrong forum. Turds aren't fetuses and you don't have a uterus. Get help.

Sue them how?

[Village Mystery]

If schools provided armed security tomorrow then it would make a profound impact on prevention. A very REAL effect.

Compare that to what the leftists and their tools suggest - go after tens of millions of guns and attack their political opponents with a policy agenda and/or pass some laws that says bad people should not be able to carry a gun. Not to mention that they DO NOT suggest the security as prevention at all. It's all about the agenda and Americans are just "bumps in the road".

[zef]

Village Mystery wrote:

<quoted text>
It's unbearable to look at those pictures or to try and consider what the parents and loved ones of those killed are going through.

Yet you have no problem with comments such as this being directed towards me. Or with those sadistic tyrants torturing me with their colon restriction devices.

When Do We Discuss Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Only one so warped, so twisted, so in love with what is truly such ignorant bullshit as religion that has clearly made left you with absolute shit for brains could muster such a truly ignorant statement.
What really needs to be done is to have ignorant pieces of shit like you castrated.
But I would prefer just two bullets fired directly into your head. Using a high powered rifle in your case as the explosion of shit once the bullets hit would be way too much if done close range.
You truly have an interchangeable mouth and asshole.

[Go Blue Forever]

...Anyone ever wonder, what the effect of these violent, gun shooting-type computer games, have on these young men? It would explain some of the desensitized behavior, they alway's display in these tragic incidents....

[Voluntarist]

yup wrote:

<quoted text>
The tax angle was just the legal technique used – others could have been used as well. Don't be so naïve. Roberts sided with the liberals to help balance out a court he knew was way off kilter.
And certain kinds of speech is banned. You can't yell "FIRE" in a crowded theater just as a joke. Lots of other similar "jokes" will get you in big trouble. Guns will never be banned - just made harder for sick people to get their hands on. And unalienable applies to many kinds of rights described in the Constitution – but is most exemplified in the Declaration of Independence by the phrase; "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" – guns are not mentioned there.

Fire or any other word is not banned, you have to be responsible for your use of the word just like you are responsible for the use of a gun.

[zef]

Anonymous wrote:

"Among the heroic survivors of the Connecticut school shooting was a first-grade teacher who, after locking her students safely in a bathroom, told them she loved them — in case those were the last words they ever heard."
I laugh when they try to make people look as if they were heros when we have no idea how things really happened.
They did the same thing on 9/11.

Don't people have the right to protect themselves from a tyrannical and oppressive government?
Perhaps torturing people with colon restriction devices should have repercussions.

[Antidepressants violence]

Let’s take a look at this. There are numerous examples of people who have gone off on a shooting rampage and killed their classmates, their co-workers, members of their family and often took their own lives, then it was shortly discovered that they were taking an antidepressant. The apparency is that the person was mentally ill and went on a rage but when these cases have actually been looked at closer, what we find is that the person did not have any violent tendencies and in most cases was not even suicidal before they started treatment with their antidepressant medication.

http://beforeitsnews.com/health/2012/07/mass-...

[Chicagoan by Birth]

Go Blue Forever wrote:

...Anyone ever wonder, what the effect of these violent, gun shooting-type computer games, have on these young men? It would explain some of the desensitized behavior, they alway's display in these tragic incidents....

We rarely agree with you. But this post says it beautifully. Thanks for it

[Buffalo Bull]

Voluntarist wrote:

<quoted text>
So what you are saying is that there is no such thing as an unalienable right.

more or less
Your right to free speach end with slander
you right to assemble end with incitment to riot
Your right to a speedy trial end in gitmo

When you abuse a right it gets taken away a felon surrenders his right to vote
You right to own a gun is recognized within the frame work of the common sense and law that has been handed down by the founders and by more than 200 yers of use judicial and legislative interpretations. Just like every oter right.
is your gun more sacred than my free speech pr right to assemble no
all rights have modifications to prevent abuse. lse wise you can not explain away the first sentence in the second."Well Regulated" sound like language ligitimizing all of the above
doesn't it

[REM223]

We here in Connecticut have some of the toughest gun laws in the country. But if those laws are not enforced by our courts, then why have them. Here`s a law thats rarely enforced by our judges. Some years ago a law was enacted that anyone who uses a firearm in the commission of a crime gets a mandatory 5 year prison sentence just for the having the weapon, then additional prison time for the crime itself. I don`t think that this sentence has ever been imposed.

I worked for many years in a residential facility for youth 11 to 18 years old with boys charged with everything from trauncy to murder. Many of these boys were gang members, others had serious mental problems while others just had family and school issues. These boys were all housed together which in it`self was problematic. All were placed either by the Dept. of children and Families or Parole. Parole was the only agency who seemed to be really concerned and in constant communication our facility and with those under their care. DCF while there were a few good representatives, many didn`t give a damm. They rarely came to visit their clients and a number would not even return phone calls made by the boys or even the facility clinical dept. These boys felt abandoned which created problems with boys acting out destroying property or fighting with peers or staff. We used to have full control over the boys when I first started there but then DCF came in with new liberal policies which curbed searches and how we could deal with violent boys. The facility became in dealing with aggressive youth out of control. Staff were told that there was a hands off policy and staff refused to touch the boys for fear of losing their jobs, resulting in much damage being done to the facility. I could write a book on DCF but enough said for now.

Much is being said about video games, some has a lot of merit to it. We had boys who played the race car games a mojority of the time, but most played extremely graphic violent games which they either hid on the grounds with other contraband upon returning from a home visit, this was accomplished with their parents help. As all were searched and drug tested upon their return. The boys would really get hyped up playing these games and would devise their own scenerios for killing their enemies. There were fights and arguments sometimes over the results of a game. Staff did confiscate the violent videos when found during searches, but it was a never ending battle with some staff looking the other way instead of wanting a confrontation with the boys. Boys would rather play videos than go outside and play sports.

In essence I believe that there is a correlation with these videos and the increasing violence America is seeing from our youth. These are training classes for gang members and those who feel disenfranchised from society.

[Go Blue Forever]

One thing is...a man wears a shoebomb onto an airplane, and everybody since, must take off their shoes, in order to board.....Yet, there have been 31 school shootings since Columbine, and we have changed virtually nothing....