Venice boardwalk rampage driver was "out for blood," witness says
Witnesses said a driver purposely and methodically plowed into crowds of people on the Venice Boardwalk Saturday evening killing at least one person.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS News.
#1 Aug 4, 2013
Why is this event not considered "terrorism"?
Suspect was intent on killing and injuring as many people as possible.
Event caused death, injuries, mass panic and mayhem in a public place.
Suspect used a weapon of mass destruction (vehicle) to cause harm.
How does this differ from what happened in Boston?
Yet, the Feds aren't involved in this one.
The suspect was not questioned for two days in private without being Mirandized.
The suspect was not charged with using a weapon of mass destruction.
No one is calling for the suspect to be hung in the public square without a trial.
The suspect is being given the opportunity to post bail.
This event is not being covered 24x7 on TV.
So, why is this Venice, CA case being treated so differently than the Boston bombing case?
Could it be that the suspect is not a Muslim?
#2 Aug 5, 2013
It was a car vs well-designed explosive devices. Any idiot can plow thru a crowd with a car.
#5 Aug 9, 2013
Thank you come again!
Add your comments below
|LA cops fatally shoot man near CNN Hollywood af... (Feb '17)||Feb '17||Pessimistic1||7|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories - Gunman Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC