Target sells shirts to help pro-gay marriage group

Full story: Fox News

FILE: May 2011: A state trooper stands by as demonstrators on both sides of the gay marriage issue gather outside the Minnesota House in St.
Comments
21 - 40 of 336 Comments Last updated Jun 18, 2012
Maybe

Aldrich, MO

#24 Jun 3, 2012
America Is Not The Same wrote:
The days of Sodom and Gomorrah and a Godless countries are returning
We all know what happened back then
Not to worry as Jesus said: "As in the days of Noah" The whole earth was filled with wickedness.

Isa 3:9 The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.
critic

United States

#25 Jun 3, 2012
Guess What wrote:
guess waht? A f a g is still a fa g.....
What do cigarettes & the United Kingdom have to do with this?

“I just hate stupid people”

Since: Apr 07

DEEP SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

#26 Jun 3, 2012
I like this idea.
A target bullseye on the enemy.
Sick

Belfry, KY

#27 Jun 3, 2012
Welp, check that store off the list of places to go.

“thoughtful liberal”

Since: Jan 11

Bethlehem, PA

#29 Jun 3, 2012
I can't believe this! I just spent $270 at Target. Had I known this, I would have spent more. Blow it out your ass you hateful bastards.
Inside Voice

Saylorsburg, PA

#30 Jun 3, 2012
Joe LaForm wrote:
I can't believe this! I just spent $270 at Target. Had I known this, I would have spent more. Blow it out your ass you hateful bastards.
Next time, save your money and spend it on conversion therapy.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#31 Jun 3, 2012
Inside Voice wrote:
<quoted text>
Next time, save your money and spend it on conversion therapy.
It didn't work for you; sweetcheeks
.
So we'll pass
Hoodathunkit

Mount Gilead, OH

#32 Jun 3, 2012
Bringmedinner wrote:
Boycott until they're dead in the water... Target, Home Depot, Ben & Jerrie's, Chase Manhatten, any Soros organization... any corporation willing to hand this country over to a deviant 1% of the population and the Commie loons guiding them.
any corporation? Would that include all of the GLBT supportive PC, MAC, laptop, and phone manufacturers? How about the GLBT supportive ISPs and OSs? Or do you intend to continue supporting GLBT rights by using devices manufactured by GLBT friendly companies with OSs created by GLBT friendly software developers and connecting to the internet with GLBT friendly ISPs?

“Equality marches on! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#33 Jun 3, 2012
Inside Voice wrote:
<quoted text>
Next time, save your money and spend it on conversion therapy.
Seriously, here you sit, posting as gay as ever, and bragging how conversion brain-washing works. Do share how much money you spent, letting your therapist "sex you down to straight-ville".
Sodomites Not A 3rd Sex

United States

#35 Jun 3, 2012
Sodomites have always been "allowed" to marry. A male

sodomite is allowed to marry a female sodomite, which is

necessary in order to consummate the marriage via sexual

intercourse.

Their problem is they want sodomy to be legally equal to sex

in marriage consummation, an act that was grounds for divorce

only 2 decades ago in most states if a husband demanded that

as his "right" as if it were sex.

In states where sodomy legally consummates marriage, men have

the right to do that to their wives (equal protection, 14th

amendment, etc.). Result: Man has control over whether she

can procreate and courts will have to rule against her if

they follow hundreds of years of precedent that a marriage

license is "consent."

When sodomy was beginning to be legalized in a few states in

the 1970s, sodomites were shouting down anyone who suggested

that one day they'd want sodomy to consummate marriage,

saying "None of us want marriage: You're a bigoted nut!"

Sodomy is not a "form of sex." It's a form of masturbation.

It can't create new citizens. The natural pity of a natural

father for his own natural children makes him work all the

harder to support them and his wife.

And that harder effort makes all society richer and safer.

Sodomy is titillation without value. "Committed, faithful

sodomites" constantly die of AIDS. Why? Because there's

something perverted about their definition of "committed and

faithful."

Tolerance doesn't include redefining sex to include sodomy as

a "form" of it.

When Freud coined the word "Homosexual" he specifically and

repeatedly explained sodomites are not a "3rd sex" but a

perverted manifestation of their own sex. Their unhealthy

lifestyle is a burden on all the health system. There is no

"safe sodomy," only safe sex: Married, faithful sex.

I have no objections personally to grown-ups committing

sodomy by consent with each other, but great objections to

forcing their bigoted view that all must accept the

redefinition of sodomy as a "form of sex."

What will they redefine next? The anus as a differently

oriented vagina. Fingers as differently positioned

phalluses? The tongue as a reproductive organ?

With all the anti-biological redifining they've forced on

society so far, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
skeptical

United States

#37 Jun 3, 2012
Sodomites Not A 3rd Sex wrote:
Sodomites have always been "allowed" to marry. A male
sodomite is allowed to marry a female sodomite, which is
necessary in order to consummate the marriage via sexual
intercourse.
Their problem is they want sodomy to be legally equal to sex
in marriage consummation, an act that was grounds for divorce
only 2 decades ago in most states if a husband demanded that
as his "right" as if it were sex.
In states where sodomy legally consummates marriage, men have
the right to do that to their wives (equal protection, 14th
amendment, etc.). Result: Man has control over whether she
can procreate and courts will have to rule against her if
they follow hundreds of years of precedent that a marriage
license is "consent."
When sodomy was beginning to be legalized in a few states in
the 1970s, sodomites were shouting down anyone who suggested
that one day they'd want sodomy to consummate marriage,
saying "None of us want marriage: You're a bigoted nut!"
Sodomy is not a "form of sex." It's a form of masturbation.
It can't create new citizens. The natural pity of a natural
father for his own natural children makes him work all the
harder to support them and his wife.
And that harder effort makes all society richer and safer.
Sodomy is titillation without value. "Committed, faithful
sodomites" constantly die of AIDS. Why? Because there's
something perverted about their definition of "committed and
faithful."
Tolerance doesn't include redefining sex to include sodomy as
a "form" of it.
When Freud coined the word "Homosexual" he specifically and
repeatedly explained sodomites are not a "3rd sex" but a
perverted manifestation of their own sex. Their unhealthy
lifestyle is a burden on all the health system. There is no
"safe sodomy," only safe sex: Married, faithful sex.
I have no objections personally to grown-ups committing
sodomy by consent with each other, but great objections to
forcing their bigoted view that all must accept the
redefinition of sodomy as a "form of sex."
What will they redefine next? The anus as a differently
oriented vagina. Fingers as differently positioned
phalluses? The tongue as a reproductive organ?
With all the anti-biological redifining they've forced on
society so far, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
ok what about to people of the same gender that never engage in sodomy? Can they reap the financial, social and legal benefits of marriage?
dont care

United States

#38 Jun 3, 2012
What the f*** is wrong with you guys does it matter if you're gay or straight we are still all people of America so what target supports gay marriage right groups it's a damn store get a life you guys and quit being jealous of people who are obviously more mature and open than you and quit hating we all know you love them secretly
Sincerely a gay girl:)

“Neutering sexual intellectuals”

Since: Dec 11

Center Ossipee, NH

#40 Jun 3, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
No one should ever be allowed to vote away the basic civil and human rights of others. If you do, expect people to fight for their families in the same way that you would if such a think was done to you.
If you would fight to protect your own family, you should buy one of those t-shirts to support the families of others.
Show me where in the Constitution(The Law of the land)where being a but pirate is a right

“Neutering sexual intellectuals”

Since: Dec 11

Center Ossipee, NH

#41 Jun 3, 2012
dont care wrote:
What the f*** is wrong with you guys does it matter if you're gay or straight we are still all people of America so what target supports gay marriage right groups it's a damn store get a life you guys and quit being jealous of people who are obviously more mature and open than you and quit hating we all know you love them secretly
Sincerely a gay girl:)
i do love lesbians as i would never do a guy i guess i,m a lesbo and proud of it,bring me some carpet to munch
skeptical

United States

#42 Jun 3, 2012
humancompass wrote:
<quoted text>Show me where in the Constitution(The Law of the land)where being a but pirate is a right
you have a right to life liberty and the pusuit of happiness. Where does it say someone elses life liberty and happiness is yours to control? And the constitution is the law of the land but there are also CFRs plus precedent legal cases which will eventually become laws.

“Neutering sexual intellectuals”

Since: Dec 11

Center Ossipee, NH

#44 Jun 3, 2012
skeptical wrote:
<quoted text>you have a right to life liberty and the pusuit of happiness. Where does it say someone elses life liberty and happiness is yours to control? And the constitution is the law of the land but there are also CFRs plus precedent legal cases which will eventually become laws.
your making noises like a pickle smoocher,look 2 the left,look2 the right,there i have just bitch slapped you!!!but ok, our country like it or not is founded on a judeo-christian base,which states man shall not lie with man as he would with woman for it shall be an abomination. fortunately for us rug munchers were not mentioned

“Neutering sexual intellectuals”

Since: Dec 11

Center Ossipee, NH

#45 Jun 3, 2012
Joe LaForm wrote:
I can't believe this! I just spent $270 at Target. Had I known this, I would have spent more. Blow it out your ass you hateful bastards.
what are ya gonna do?scratch our eyes out
dont care

United States

#46 Jun 3, 2012
humancompass wrote:
<quoted text>i do love lesbians as i would never do a guy i guess i,m a lesbo and proud of it,bring me some carpet to munch
it's different do u have the fact tht guys are gay too?
dont care

United States

#47 Jun 3, 2012
dont care wrote:
<quoted text>it's different do u have the fact tht guys are gay too?
hate
Who

Stockton, CA

#48 Jun 3, 2012
Common Sense Isnt wrote:
In America we have a Constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. Banning same sex unions while allowing opposite sex unions and all of the legal perks that go with it is a clear violation of this right. No one is saying the union needs to be recognized or accepted by the church, but the State cannot discriminate based only on orientation. If your hang up is on the word "marriage" being used, then fine I can understand that as marriage is a religious sacrament. But it also means that the State should not be using religious terminology to define a legal contract between committed adults and the special legal benefits that come with it. Everything should be called Civil Unions with applicant one and two.
As a conservative, I cannot sit by and watch Constitutional rights be denied to fellow Americans simply because the act of male/male intimacy is nauseating to me. It is healthy for society to have committed couples in a loving marriage. If you want to protect the institution of marriage, then make it harder to get divorced before you start taking away the freedoms of others.
Gays aren't being denied a single constitutional right, they have every right that everyone else has, free speech, right to bear arms, etc.

This bullshit about them wanting to get married just because they love each other is ridiculous, what they really want is the benefits and that's all.

If you argue with a gay about marriage the response is always "most heterosexual marriages end in divorce" so why would they want to get married if marriage is so bad? THE BENEFITS.

Gays in relationships are together aren't they? Isn't that all you really need if they're just together because "they love each other"?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Gay Marriage Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 15 min KiMare 55,000
Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares fo... (Mar '13) 43 min KiMare 1,558
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 7 hr Frankie Rizzo 558
Texas: Gay-marriage ban best for children Aug 25 Frankie Rizzo 761
Challenges to gay marriage bans: Where they stand Aug 25 Lawrence Wolf 67
gay men having sex! Aug 9 Kermudgeon 0
Summary of gay marriage cases before appeals court Aug 6 Fa-Foxy 1
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••