Minnesota becomes 12th state to OK gay marriage

Full story: Fox News 1,596
As a crowd of thousands roared from the lawn of the state Capitol, Minnesota Gov. Full Story
First Prev
of 80
Next Last
DENG

Nanjing, China

#1 May 15, 2013
mar·riage
/ˈmarij/
Noun

The formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife.

A relationship between married people or the period for which it lasts.

Synonyms
wedding - matrimony - wedlock - nuptials - espousal

SOMEONE SHOULD SACK THAT JEWISH GOVERNOR THERE???
Ignorance Is NOT Bliss

Beacon, NY

#2 May 15, 2013
DENG wrote:
mar·riage
/ˈmarij/
Noun
The formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife.
A relationship between married people or the period for which it lasts.
Synonyms
wedding - matrimony - wedlock - nuptials - espousal
SOMEONE SHOULD SACK THAT JEWISH GOVERNOR THERE???
Perhaps you should update your atiguated dictionary! All the latest new ones in fact do have a definition for same sex marriage! Equality marches on! Now please go and get run over by a tank in tiananmen square please you dolt! How wonderful,anti-semetic too! What a loser you are commie boy!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#3 May 15, 2013
DENG wrote:
mar·riage
/ˈmarij/
Noun
The formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife.
A relationship between married people or the period for which it lasts.
Synonyms
wedding - matrimony - wedlock - nuptials - espousal
SOMEONE SHOULD SACK THAT JEWISH GOVERNOR THERE???
the definition of marriage has included same sex unions for quite some time now.

check you calendar, there should be 4 digits in the year...

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#5 May 15, 2013
DENG wrote:
mar·riage
/ˈmarij/
Noun
The formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife.
A relationship between married people or the period for which it lasts.
Synonyms
wedding - matrimony - wedlock - nuptials - espousal
SOMEONE SHOULD SACK THAT JEWISH GOVERNOR THERE???
Websters Definition of Marriage

1
a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3
: an intimate or close union <the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross>

“HHhhhoooowwwlll”

Since: Feb 08

Craigville

#6 May 15, 2013
Another sad day in the annals of Minnesota State History. We are on the wrong side of history, as time will prove out. Those who voted this in are as inept as those pushing this law, letting emotions rule the day when deviant sexual desires require special rights. Let the persecution/law suits against those who disagree begin. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, which makes this whole charade that much more reckless. Will the US Supreme Court also be duped?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#7 May 15, 2013
40for60 wrote:
Another sad day in the annals of Minnesota State History. We are on the wrong side of history, as time will prove out. Those who voted this in are as inept as those pushing this law, letting emotions rule the day when deviant sexual desires require special rights. Let the persecution/law suits against those who disagree begin. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, which makes this whole charade that much more reckless. Will the US Supreme Court also be duped?
No, a proud day for our state.

history has already proven that legalizing SSM has really no effect on a society other than making it more moral and more humane.

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#8 May 15, 2013
Ignorance Is NOT Bliss wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should update your atiguated dictionary! All the latest new ones in fact do have a definition for same sex marriage! Equality marches on! Now please go and get run over by a tank in tiananmen square please you dolt! How wonderful,anti-semetic too! What a loser you are commie boy!
Whether they like it or not, equality for all is on the horizon. Remember when blacks, women, Native Americans, Jews and other groups could not vote, have a bank account, own land etc? That changed much to their chagrin and so will this. YAY, Minnesota!

“Live Love Laugh”

Since: Aug 07

Rings of Saturn Emporium

#9 May 15, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Websters Definition of Marriage
1
a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3
: an intimate or close union <the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross>
The fundies will never again use that dictionary! They'll hold onto a 100 year old dictionary until death takes it from their bony fingers.
Eddie Muscles

Hampton, VA

#10 May 15, 2013
Don't care what laws these states pass, no one's gonna make me marry a homo!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#11 May 15, 2013
Woo Hoo....,Go Minnesota.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#12 May 15, 2013
water_nymph wrote:
<quoted text> The fundies will never again use that dictionary! They'll hold onto a 100 year old dictionary until death takes it from their bony fingers.
nah...the bible fills up their prejudicial little hands... no room for books of reason and facts.

“Serenity Now!”

Since: May 07

York Township, OH

#13 May 15, 2013
Not a good day for America.
Windy

Buffalo, NY

#15 May 15, 2013
40for60 wrote:
Another sad day in the annals of Minnesota State History. We are on the wrong side of history, as time will prove out. Those who voted this in are as inept as those pushing this law, letting emotions rule the day when deviant sexual desires require special rights. Let the persecution/law suits against those who disagree begin. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, which makes this whole charade that much more reckless. Will the US Supreme Court also be duped?
Wanting to marry someone you love is a deviant sexual desire? Hmmmm. If that were the case, why would they want to get married and be with one person for life? If all gays are sexual deviants, wouldn't they want to have as many sexual partners as possible?
Ashley Cainn

Spring, TX

#17 May 15, 2013
Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God." (NIV).
Ashley Cainn

Spring, TX

#18 May 15, 2013
Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19 May 15, 2013
Ashley Cainn wrote:
Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God." (NIV).
Who cares about the word of Paul?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#20 May 15, 2013
Windy wrote:
<quoted text>
Wanting to marry someone you love is a deviant sexual desire? Hmmmm. If that were the case, why would they want to get married and be with one person for life? If all gays are sexual deviants, wouldn't they want to have as many sexual partners as possible?
Precisely! I asked myself the very same question.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#21 May 15, 2013
40for60 wrote:
Another sad day in the annals of Minnesota State History. We are on the wrong side of history, as time will prove out. Those who voted this in are as inept as those pushing this law, letting emotions rule the day when deviant sexual desires require special rights. Let the persecution/law suits against those who disagree begin. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, which makes this whole charade that much more reckless. Will the US Supreme Court also be duped?
Welcome to the real world; sugar
.
You just outed yourself as a person with bisexual orientation (attracted to both sexes)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
.
The rest of us have monosexual orientation (attracted to one sex only)

“HHhhhoooowwwlll”

Since: Feb 08

Craigville

#22 May 15, 2013
Windy wrote:
<quoted text>
Wanting to marry someone you love is a deviant sexual desire? Hmmmm. If that were the case, why would they want to get married and be with one person for life? If all gays are sexual deviants, wouldn't they want to have as many sexual partners as possible?
Homosexuality is a deviant sexual desire. I love my parents and siblings, I even have male friends that I love, but that doesn't prompt me to want have sex with them or marry them. I would have to believe that homosexuality is something that it is not to ever consider the marriage charade.
It is a known fact that Homosexuals have many more partners than heterosexuals on the average. Allowing same sex marriage will not alter that fact. Hope this helps.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#23 May 15, 2013
Orientation is in fact immutible. But that's not what we base rights on--religion is an entirely chosen entity. I guess we need to get rid of any rights based on religion, huh?
40for60 wrote:
Another sad day in the annals of Minnesota State History. We are on the wrong side of history, as time will prove out. Those who voted this in are as inept as those pushing this law, letting emotions rule the day when deviant sexual desires require special rights. Let the persecution/law suits against those who disagree begin. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, which makes this whole charade that much more reckless. Will the US Supreme Court also be duped?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 80
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Gay Marriage Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 3 hr Cali Girl 2014 55,904
Judge restores part of Indiana gay marriage suit 10 hr TomInElPaso 2
Stay issued in Indiana gay marriage ban case 22 hr KiMare 21
GOP candidate backs gay marriage Sep 10 Maggie Gallaghers... 15
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... Sep 9 BEYONDtheCMB 929
Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares fo... (Mar '13) Sep 1 Terra Firma 1,568
Texas: Gay-marriage ban best for children Aug 25 Frankie Rizzo 733
•••

People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••