Rand Paul invokes bestiality while di...

Rand Paul invokes bestiality while discussing gay marriage, walks it back

There are 297 comments on the The Washington Post story from Jun 27, 2013, titled Rand Paul invokes bestiality while discussing gay marriage, walks it back. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

"It is difficult, because if we have no laws on this, people will take it to one extension further - does it have to be humans?" Paul said Wednesday in an interview with Glenn Beck, after Beck suggested some unintended consequences of the rulings, including polygamy.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#147 Jul 2, 2013
Eleanor wrote:
<quoted text>
All untitled property of a spouse remains the property of the marriage, even when one spouse dies.
Maybe in your state, not in my state. If I have money in an account and it isn't a joint account or an account with a named beneficiary being married doesn't cut it. That money would become part of my estate, end up in probate and the state would distribute it.

Gay couples, married or not, can have joint accounts and name beneficiaries. Not to do so would be stupid.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#148 Jul 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
I know one couple who have six kids of "theirs"
That's key and an impossibility for you and your partner.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#149 Jul 2, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee. Did they also tell you the sex of their spouse, or did you just assume?
It would be a fairly safe assumption, even here in Massachusetts.
The number of gay marriages in the state are relatively few and the number that are between Massachusetts residents far fewer.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#150 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
When you show me how two men can produce a child we can talk about it.
Men don't produce children, Shug.

Women produce children.

You should have had this talk already.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#151 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
When you show me how two men can produce a child
I see you skipped over the fertile parents not adapting claim.

I am not going to play you rationalizing your bigotry, bigot.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#152 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe in your state, not in my state. If I have money in an account and it isn't a joint account or an account with a named beneficiary being married doesn't cut it. That money would become part of my estate, end up in probate and the state would distribute it.
Right, because all deaths in MA ends up in probate when there's no will.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#153 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
That's key and an impossibility for you and your partner.
~stomp stomp stomp~

Still looking for your biological father, eh, Shug?

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#154 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
When you show me how two men can produce a child we can talk about it. You just provided more evidence that you have mental issues.
When you can illustrate that procreation is a prerequisite for, or requirement of legal marriage, then your point will be relevant.
Puddy Galore

Alpharetta, GA

#155 Jul 2, 2013
Rose of Tralee wrote:
I want to marry my cat
First step is to have a Puddy Pride Parade
.
The gay peeps have some good used parade floats for rent cheap
.
Made in USA; the REAL deal!
Fabulous Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#156 Jul 2, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Placing a child in a household with two men as to suggest parenting denies any child the basic human right to be endowed with a female mother for nurturing, commpassion, and bonding, in the childs most indelible years of their lives. I am so sorry your wretched depraved little mind no comprende'.
Putting a child in a household with two crude straight men would; but not two gay men
.
There is a huge difference. Gay men provide a total child-raising experience that is foreign to straight men
.
Straight men are ho-hum
.
Gay men are Fabulous
.
But then; you already know that; so you're just being obtuse
.
Pathetic you

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#157 Jul 2, 2013
Fabulous Rainbow Kid wrote:
There is a huge difference. Gay men provide a total child-raising experience that is foreign to straight men
Sexual bigotry is a two way street.

The day of 'mothers make the best parent' are long over.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#158 Jul 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Men don't produce children, Shug.
Women produce children.
You should have had this talk already.
"sperm and egg make em, a womb bakes em"

Since: Apr 13

Chicago, IL

#159 Jul 2, 2013
I can see Rand Paul pounding a sheep. He might want to look into sheeoapause. If the sheep stops giving up the lamb chop because she ( or he whatever he prefers ) is going through sheepapause , what happens if you start sneaking around the neighbors barn. You know what they say, if you won't eat the chop, your neighbor will.
valirie

Brooklyn, NY

#160 Jul 2, 2013
What happens when a race becomes degenerate. I hope more and more Latinos and other third world immergrants take over this country, the current residents are not fit to live in it.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#161 Jul 2, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Placing a child in a household with two men as to suggest parenting denies any child the basic human right to be endowed with a female mother for nurturing, commpassion, and bonding, in the childs most indelible years of their lives. I am so sorry your wretched depraved little mind no comprende'.
I'm very sorry that your own father was incapable of nurturing, commpassion[sic] and bonding. I'm sorry that his inability to share these things with you made you so wretchedly deparved.

But in other families, most normal fathers, straight or gay, are fully capable of providing children with these things.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#162 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay couples CAN'T produce their own children.
Um, are they required to?
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one without a clue.
No that would be you. The poster you responded to noted that gay children do have children. Which we do. YOU were the one that brought in how the child is produced. Because you think its important. It isn't.
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
When straight couples adopt it's because they have a medical problem. Why do gay couples adopt? They have no medical problem.
No truth to this whatsoever. There are plenty of straight people that have no medical problems that adopt. They sometimes mix the adopted children in with their own. There are also plenty of straight people with no medical problems that altruistically prefer to adopt. Your "medical problems" are completely fabricated. And gays adopt for the same reason that other people adopt. Are there any other stupid questions we can answer for you?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#163 Jul 2, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
When you show me how two men can produce a child we can talk about it.
First you need to show why they are required to.

Let us know when you can do that dolt.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#164 Jul 2, 2013
shadowrydr420 wrote:
I can see Rand Paul pounding a sheep.
To be fair, it isn't a crime in Kentucky.

For some, it's a hobby.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#165 Jul 3, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
No that would be you. The poster you responded to noted that gay children do have children. Which we do. YOU were the one that brought in how the child is produced. Because you think its important. It isn't.
The poster responded to the fact that two men or two women can't produce a child. He, like you, attempted to dismiss the importance because neither of you can produce a child with your partner, if you have one. It is extremely important to those that can and do.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#166 Jul 3, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
No truth to this whatsoever. There are plenty of straight people that have no medical problems that adopt. They sometimes mix the adopted children in with their own. There are also plenty of straight people with no medical problems that altruistically prefer to adopt. Your "medical problems" are completely fabricated. And gays adopt for the same reason that other people adopt.
More proof that stupid stays stupid.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Gay Marriage Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 2 hr herrylau 60,823
News Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions (Oct '14) 18 hr nhjeff 6,365
News 9 Alabama counties still not issuing gay marria... Jul 24 Reverend Alan 17
News Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares fo... (Mar '13) Jul 15 darwin 1,580
News Now the gay marriage fight will become a fight ... Jul 7 Dan 8
News 'Obey God, not Man' Starnes: Southern Baptists ... Jul 4 PastorTom 95
News Episcopalians vote to allow gay marriage in chu... Jul '15 RevKen 12
More from around the web