Video: Friend defends author of bin Laden raid book

There are 24 comments on the CBS News story from Sep 1, 2012, titled Video: Friend defends author of bin Laden raid book. In it, CBS News reports that:

The former Navy SEAL using the pseudonym Mark Owens is coming under fire from the Defense Department about his book about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS News.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
911 was an inside job

Austin, TX

#22 Sep 10, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, I watch your video. That video was shot after the first tower collapse because I remember watching the news agency interview that particular group of firemen along with a few NYPD officers.
Not to mention that shit that is on their coats is the concrete dust from the floors of the world trade centers. The world trade center was a center core constrution or tube inside tube and it's integrity relied upon the exterior shell of the building to remain uncomprimised. The poured the floors then raised and attached to the center core and exterior using L brackets. The "bombs" that every claims they were hearing were the brackets failing(melting) under the weight of the floors and fire loading aka what burns when it is on fire. I used wikipedia for the sake of keeping it simple. I also post website for you to review that firefighters are actually trained in building constuction and have training materials avaiable to the free world for review.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_loading
http://www.amazon.com/s/...
More firefighters discussing their experience at the World Trade Center:

&

Where did the molten steel come from? Can hydrocarbon-fueled fires burn hot enough to melt steel?

Center-core construction. Indeed. Here's a photo showing the core during construction.

http://911research.com/wtc/evidence/photos/wt...

What caused the cores to fail?

Here is a recent demolition attempt in the Netherlands:

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Apparently, the failure of the perimeter doesn't guarantee the failure of the core.

But take a look at WTC-7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The roof-line is actually dropping symmetrically at FREE-FALL ACCELERATION!! In other words, if you were standing on the roof of the building and dropped a ball off the edge -- doesn't matter where on the edge -- just as the roof started to drop, you and the rest of the top part of the WTC-7 would keep pace with the ball!! The top floor is encountering ZERO resistance, meaning that ALL structural support failed completely. The symmetry of collapse indicates that the failures also happened SIMULTANEOUSLY.

So you can believe the official fiction about some asymmetric damage and naturally progressing fires causing the unprecedented total collapse of a steel-frame high-rise...

Or you can believe your eyes and marvel at this masterpiece of demolition. I challenge you to find a more expertly crafted building implosion.
911 was an inside job

Austin, TX

#23 Sep 10, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not the one with "911 was an inside job" trying to remain anonymous either. I hear what you are saying, and I dismiss it entirely because it is a boat load of crap.
You disrespect the very memories of the thousands of people who perished on 9/11, the men and women of our armed forces as well as the first line of home defense, our public safety officals and government officals with your rehtoric.
I would have no problem going to jail after I stomped a mudhole in your hippie ass till it was dry and sent you home back to your momma so you can be the king of World of Warcraft and a internet tough guy.
Are these people disrespecting the memories of the people who perished on 9/11?



What about these?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Are you going to "stomp a mudhole" in father of a 9/11 victim Bob McIlvaine because, after nine years of research, he KNOWS that it was an inside job?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Let's see what you've got, tough guy.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#24 Sep 10, 2012
911 was an inside job wrote:
<quoted text>
More firefighters discussing their experience at the World Trade Center:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =cCdRA09pztMXX&
Where did the molten steel come from? Can hydrocarbon-fueled fires burn hot enough to melt steel?
Center-core construction. Indeed. Here's a photo showing the core during construction.
http://911research.com/wtc/evidence/photos/wt...
What caused the cores to fail?
Here is a recent demolition attempt in the Netherlands:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Apparently, the failure of the perimeter doesn't guarantee the failure of the core.
But take a look at WTC-7.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The roof-line is actually dropping symmetrically at FREE-FALL ACCELERATION!! In other words, if you were standing on the roof of the building and dropped a ball off the edge -- doesn't matter where on the edge -- just as the roof started to drop, you and the rest of the top part of the WTC-7 would keep pace with the ball!! The top floor is encountering ZERO resistance, meaning that ALL structural support failed completely. The symmetry of collapse indicates that the failures also happened SIMULTANEOUSLY.
So you can believe the official fiction about some asymmetric damage and naturally progressing fires causing the unprecedented total collapse of a steel-frame high-rise...
Or you can believe your eyes and marvel at this masterpiece of demolition. I challenge you to find a more expertly crafted building implosion.
Well, where do I start. I was working that morning and after we got our morning things done we sat and started watching. That was just a little before the second tower was struck. So, from that point on, watch with my own eyes. I know what I saw courtesy of mainstream media.

Secondly, I was part of a group that went to New York as part of relief group of the International Association of Firefighters and assisted in the recovery. We did everything from sifting at the site to running and getting groceries for the guys families. Again, I know what I saw, what I heard, what I smelled.

I know it is impossible for you to reason that people out there want to do ill will to you. They do. You have managed to turn this thread away from the navy "seal" book into a pissing contest over 9/11.

Real classy. Again, I dismiss anything and everything you lay claim to as a conspiracy and you are now deemed and eneny of America by my book. I will show you no quarter or aid.

Good luck.
911 was an inside job

Austin, TX

#25 Sep 10, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, where do I start. I was working that morning and after we got our morning things done we sat and started watching. That was just a little before the second tower was struck. So, from that point on, watch with my own eyes. I know what I saw courtesy of mainstream media.
Secondly, I was part of a group that went to New York as part of relief group of the International Association of Firefighters and assisted in the recovery. We did everything from sifting at the site to running and getting groceries for the guys families. Again, I know what I saw, what I heard, what I smelled.
I know it is impossible for you to reason that people out there want to do ill will to you. They do.....
What did you see or smell that led you to conclude that people "out there" were responsible? Which people and from where? I'm certainly not arguing with the fact that there are people out there that want to kill. There are also people that want to make money, and people who want to consolidate power.

How can 19 "Muslim extremist" hijackers be responsible for the pre-planned demolition of three skyscrapers with security-conscious tenants like the CIA and SEC and DoD? Where did all the nanothermitic material and thermitic residues come from? Where was our multi-trillion dollar military during the nearly two hour attack? How was the headquarters of our military still vulnerable one and a half hours into the attack? Aren't there quite a few airbases ringing our nation's capital? Why was no one in our military and intelligence not held accountable for failures? In fact, why were so many people in positions of responsibility PROMOTED?

When a military fails so horribly as ours did on 9/11, does it make sense to promote the people in command and vastly increase the budgets of these agencies? The Girl Scouts were AS SUCCESSFUL in defending our nation on 9/11 as the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, FBI, etc., but they did it on a much smaller budget... and by selling cookies!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Bin Laden Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Did enhanced interrogation help the CIA find Os... Dec '14 lol 2
News Romney 'applauds' Obama for Osama bin Laden raid (May '12) Nov '14 Bruno24 50
News Push to declassify more documents seized from b... (Jun '13) Apr '14 swedenforever 4
News Bergen: Pakistan hid Bin Laden? Prove it (Mar '14) Mar '14 Quagmire 12
News Pakistan reduces sentence for doctor accused of... (Mar '14) Mar '14 PAKIs_TALK_OUT_OF... 4
News NY Jury Selection Starts for Bin Laden Son-in-Law (Mar '14) Mar '14 Clintons NEED A T... 3
News Order: Destroy pics of bin Laden's body (Feb '14) Feb '14 mjjcpa 1
More from around the web