Ah, the usual mis information. On Meet the Press and other main stream news outlets, the CIA director of the operation, the man looking at ALL the real time data 24/7, specifically said, "50% chance at best that this was OBL". All military advisors (ie the generals) said not to go, because odd that this was OBL were too low, the mission was politically too risky. Meanwhile constant surveillence by satilite, drone, sensory positions on land and visual contact with boot on the ground 24/7 of the compound intelligence. That comes from the CIA groundpounder assigned from the beginning to find Bin Lauden. Same man specifically is quoted as saying to the press, "waterboarding did not produce the intelligence. The intelligence began with the re established contact of favorite OBL courrier." Courrier was found with a chance telephone transmission discovered by NSA, of the courrior. Questioning, without torture of the Quantonimo inmates in the know, confirmed courriours importance. Courrior eventyually tracked to Lahore Pakistasn (source/method not reveiled). Courrior, by human surveillance, led to OBL compound. The rest is histort.
So, it seems that the actual pasrticipants statements make you a big ol LIAR !! No news to the forum readers.
I guess YOU missed the news
Intel Ops that GW set up found UBL
Navy SEAL's tagged him
He took 16 hours to make a snap decision.
As soon as Obama heard that UBL's location had been identified with a 75% probability, his only words should have been, "General, why haven't you commenced operations?" NOT, let me sleep on it.
Obama's involvement? Dithering!!!!
As for who "let" 9/11 happen? I'd say that Clinton's dismantling of Intel and inter-agency communications (as part of his "Peace Dividend") had a lot to do with that. Ya think?