Police: Afghan suicide bomber attacks...

Police: Afghan suicide bomber attacks NATO convoy; no casualties

There are 38 comments on the The Washington Post story from Dec 25, 2012, titled Police: Afghan suicide bomber attacks NATO convoy; no casualties. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

Afghan police say a suicide bomber attacked a NATO convoy in eastern Afghanistan but report no casualties in the strike.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#1 Dec 25, 2012
Is that Nato the terrorist group which killed tens of thousands in Libya recently?? Is that the Nato this article speaks of??

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#2 Dec 25, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
Is that Nato the terrorist group which killed tens of thousands in Libya recently?? Is that the Nato this article speaks of??
You should read the article.
The Taliban said they were responsible for the attack against Afghans.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#3 Dec 25, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
You should read the article.
The Taliban said they were responsible for the attack against Afghans.
Ahh so nother american proxie terrorist force right?? George go hide behind your other name.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#4 Dec 25, 2012
another*

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#5 Dec 25, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
<quoted text>Ahh so nother american proxie terrorist force right?? George go hide behind your other name.
Only a non registered poster like yourself would have multiple names.
Read the article before you sling your mud otherwise you be covered in it.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#6 Dec 25, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a non registered poster like yourself would have multiple names.
Read the article before you sling your mud otherwise you be covered in it.
Having a registered name means nothing.You and the other hasbarats have many registered and unregistered names on here.So what is your point??

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#7 Dec 25, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
<quoted text>Having a registered name means nothing.You and the other hasbarats have many registered and unregistered names on here.So what is your point??
Why would I bother registering my identity if I wanted to post in different names ?I realize there are many who have multiple names but that to me only confuses the issue so I don't do it.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#8 Dec 26, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
Is that Nato the terrorist group which killed tens of thousands in Libya recently?? Is that the Nato this article speaks of??
Yes. That's the one.

Do you remember MAD magazine? Well, maybe it's still printed, I don't know. Anyway, there was a series called "Spy vs Spy". I guess the United Snakes liked the idea so much that they created a Terrorist group themselves (called NATO) so they could give birth to an era of "Terrorist vs Terrorist".

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#9 Dec 26, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
Is that Nato the terrorist group which killed tens of thousands in Libya recently?? Is that the Nato this article speaks of??
How many people WERE killed via NATO airstrikes in comparison to how many were killed due to the civil war that was taking place between Libyians ?

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#10 Dec 26, 2012
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. That's the one.
Do you remember MAD magazine? Well, maybe it's still printed, I don't know. Anyway, there was a series called "Spy vs Spy". I guess the United Snakes liked the idea so much that they created a Terrorist group themselves (called NATO) so they could give birth to an era of "Terrorist vs Terrorist".
I thought NATO was invented to stop all European aggression that has caused two world wars and to defend each member state against aggression from Russia and anybody else.

Their incursion in Libya should be deemed illegal by their own charter seeing they were not under attack.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#11 Dec 26, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought NATO was invented to stop all European aggression that has caused two world wars
Not exactly. NATO is an "armed force". NATO MAKES war not STOPS war. You must be thinking of the UN - THAT is a "peace-keeping force".
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text> NATO ..... and to defend each member state against aggression from Russia and anybody else.
Actually, NATO was pited against "the other guys" called the WARSAW PACT, which (just as NATO) was comprised of an international force to defend each member state against aggression from the U.S. and anybody else.
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>Their incursion in Libya should be deemed illegal by their own charter seeing they were not under attack.
If you're referring to NATO then I agree 120%.
Sve

Stockholm, Sweden

#12 Dec 26, 2012
suicide bomber was casualty, he was human being too. It is apparently a sign for usa and for all these other sidekickers that they must get out, withdraw from this Afghanistan and leave these poor Afghans at last. usa and the rest of this criminal, degenerate company get out, buzz off.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#13 Dec 26, 2012
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Not exactly. NATO is an "armed force". NATO MAKES war not STOPS war. You must be thinking of the UN - THAT is a "peace-keeping force".
<quoted text>
Actually, NATO was pited against "the other guys" called the WARSAW PACT, which (just as NATO) was comprised of an international force to defend each member state against aggression from the U.S. and anyone else
NATO was set up after the 2nd world war to amalgamate Europe into a force to protect Europe together.
It was set up by the USA not against the USA

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#14 Dec 26, 2012
Sve wrote:
suicide bomber was casualty, he was human being too. It is apparently a sign for usa and for all these other sidekickers that they must get out, withdraw from this Afghanistan and leave these poor Afghans at last. usa and the rest of this criminal, degenerate company get out, buzz off.
He attacked Afghani's
If the Taliban stopped hostilities then the foreign troops would have no need to be there.
How simple is that ?
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#15 Dec 26, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would I bother registering my identity if I wanted to post in different names ?I realize there are many who have multiple names but that to me only confuses the issue so I don't do it.
You do that because you want to seem as different people to unaware viewers and that is very obvious.You fool no one I assure you.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#16 Dec 26, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
How many people WERE killed via NATO airstrikes in comparison to how many were killed due to the civil war that was taking place between Libyians ?
There was no civil war in Libya just as there is not one in Syria.They both are terrorist proxie wars where paid killers are brought from many countries of the world and armed and funded by the american government and israel.The vast majority of Libyans supported the Gadaffi government just as the majority of Syrians support the Assad government.What is happening in syria is an exact repeat of what was done to Libya and the american israel controlled government is 100% behind it as most of the world knows.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#17 Dec 26, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought NATO was invented to stop all European aggression that has caused two world wars and to defend each member state against aggression from Russia and anybody else.
Their incursion in Libya should be deemed illegal by their own charter seeing they were not under attack.
The europeans are not what caused the 2 world wars.
truth Always beats lIes23

Covington, VA

#18 Dec 26, 2012
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
NATO was set up after the 2nd world war to amalgamate Europe into a force to protect Europe together.
It was set up by the USA not against the USA
It was set up by the american government as it intended to occupy europe for decades and is still there today.All these american bases should be removed from every country except america.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#19 Dec 26, 2012
Sve wrote:
suicide bomber was casualty, he was human being too. It is apparently a sign for usa and for all these other sidekickers that they must get out, withdraw from this Afghanistan and leave these poor Afghans at last. usa and the rest of this criminal, degenerate company get out, buzz off.
Bravo, Sve!
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
NATO ...... It was set up by the USA not against the USA
Read my post again ... more carefully this time. Pay particular attention to the "words".
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
He attacked Afghani's
If the Taliban stopped hostilities then the foreign troops would have no need to be there.
How simple is that ?
Whose country do you think Afghanistan is? With all of the mass murders in the U.S. perhaps NATO ought to go over there and shoot the place up too, hmmmmm?

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#20 Dec 26, 2012
truth Always beats lIes23 wrote:
<quoted text>You do that because you want to seem as different people to unaware viewers and that is very obvious.You fool no one I assure you.
You are fooling yourself with your own assumptions.
Are you on medication ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Afghanistan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News U.S. commander: Progress in fighting the Taliba... Jul 19 mary scott 1
News A necessary but frustrating delay in the U.S. w... Jul 8 Henry 1
News Obama okays new authority for U.S. forces in Af... Jun '16 Mike 1
News Iran teams with Taliban to fight Islamic State ... May '16 Jim 2
News Afghan Taliban leader reportedly was in Iran ho... May '16 EUI 1
News Homeland Security Takes Lead in Search for Afgh... (Dec '15) Jan '16 The Dude Imbibes 87
News Obama to keep 5,500 US troops in Afghanistan be... (Oct '15) Jan '16 Riding the Range 61
More from around the web