"Science vs. Religion: What Scientist...

"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think"

There are 58041 comments on the Examiner.com story from Jan 22, 2012, titled "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think". In it, Examiner.com reports that:

It is fascinating to note that atheists boast that most scientists are atheists.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

Mugwump

Leeds, UK

#11185 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
Our tiny planet in the scheme of things, travels around our galaxy, holding its position, not only in our tiny solar system, but across the entire galaxy, as claimed by science, as our galaxy travels at over 900,000 miles per hour, just as the rest of the bodies do, while they all remain in order.
An asteroid the size of two football fields around, hitting the earth could annihilate ell life on earth and throw dust all around the globe, so, do tell how the morons making the claims they do are listened too?
Those morons have supposition and nothing more. An asteroid the size of manhattan could easily create such dust or even storms.
Shove you hypothesis.
When you sober up I would suggest you review your posts and see who the moron is ... Let me give you a quick summary so you don't have to waste to much time before your next drink.

Your hypothesis (= lunatic synaptic misfire)
No celestial body ever has or will impact with another.

Everyone else points out evidence of the opposite - I would also add the
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Collision with Jupiter - 14 big chunks of rock crashing into Jupiter some 15 years ago

Conclusion - you are wrong

Now move on to your next piece of unsubstantiated nonsense - maybe something about how the colour yellow is more intelligent than the colour blue

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#11186 Jul 20, 2012
Mugwump wrote:
<quoted text>
When you sober up I would suggest you review your posts and see who the moron is ... Let me give you a quick summary so you don't have to waste to much time before your next drink.
Your hypothesis (= lunatic synaptic misfire)
No celestial body ever has or will impact with another.
Everyone else points out evidence of the opposite - I would also add the
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Collision with Jupiter - 14 big chunks of rock crashing into Jupiter some 15 years ago
Conclusion - you are wrong
Now move on to your next piece of unsubstantiated nonsense - maybe something about how the colour yellow is more intelligent than the colour blue
That's the funny thing about theists / liars. There's photographic & video evidence of comets colliding with bodies in space.

there's absolutely no proof of anything religious being true, but they're content to lie about science openly and shamelessly without fear of being proven wrong...
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11187 Jul 20, 2012
I've been talking nothing but science, but when the children have no scientific rebuttal, they resort to talking about God.

Way ya go children.
Mugwump

UK

#11188 Jul 20, 2012
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the funny thing about theists / liars. There's photographic & video evidence of comets colliding with bodies in space.
there's absolutely no proof of anything religious being true, but they're content to lie about science openly and shamelessly without fear of being proven wrong...
To be fair , jimbos rants are nothing to do with religious beliefs - he is just a loony - an obnoxious, racist, paranoid, uneducated loony - but a loony nonetheless.

He isn't coherent enough to hold any religious beliefs
Mugwump

UK

#11189 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
You moron, those are not planets that are spinning and revolving, but hey, thanks for proving what a moron you are.
Of course since you insist rotation confers gravity - a none spinning object would be LESS likely to crash into another - so the fact we have observed ANY celestial object impacting another further falsifies your nonsense.

Watch jimbo start to dribble as he tries to untangle the various threads of his garbage into a logical response ... Then reverts to his inner child and throws out insults
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11190 Jul 20, 2012
So your still to stupid to understand that all stars, planets and such that spin and revolve, as in a stable orbit, will not encroach on a another planet or star, because they have their own stable orbit.

One world cannot move into another worlds stable orbit. While gravity holds it in place, it will repulse any other planet sized entity.

Hey you morons, comets and asteroids are not planet sized worlds.

Ok, you can talk about god now, because your too stupid to understand science.
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11191 Jul 20, 2012
Those who can speak to science do. Those that can't, speak about people.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#11192 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
So your still to stupid to understand that all stars, planets and such that spin and revolve, as in a stable orbit, will not encroach on a another planet or star, because they have their own stable orbit.
One world cannot move into another worlds stable orbit. While gravity holds it in place, it will repulse any other planet sized entity.
Hey you morons, comets and asteroids are not planet sized worlds.
Ok, you can talk about god now, because your too stupid to understand science.
More scientific pearls of wisdom from sufficiently illiterate.
Mugwump

UK

#11193 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
So your still to stupid to understand that all stars, planets and such that spin and revolve, as in a stable orbit, will not encroach on a another planet or star, because they have their own stable orbit.
One world cannot move into another worlds stable orbit. While gravity holds it in place, it will repulse any other planet sized entity.
Hey you morons, comets and asteroids are not planet sized worlds.
Ok, you can talk about god now, because your too stupid to understand science.
Evidence already given to show the above to be nonsense

Plus pointed out the fact that as YOU insist rotation confers gravity , hence attraction - any evidence blows you argument out the water.

Now piss off - you must have a bottle waiting for you
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11195 Jul 20, 2012
A person of science gives proof. The rest just run off at the mouth about other people.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#11196 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
Those who can speak to science do. Those that can't, speak about people.
Well said, but unless you're comfortable with doing so hypocritically, you should avoid injecting phrases like "So your (sic) still to (sic) stupid," "Hey you morons," or "because your (sic) too stupid to understand science" into your posts.
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11197 Jul 20, 2012
Rotation has three aspects, one is for itself and it's world-- gravity. The other two are for all else and that is repulsion and propulsion,-- just as objects that hit earths atmosphere at a shallow angle, skip off earths atmosphere.

Don't think children, it only enrages you.
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11198 Jul 20, 2012
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said, but unless you're comfortable with doing so hypocritically, you should avoid injecting phrases like "So your (sic) still to (sic) stupid," "Hey you morons," or "because your (sic) too stupid to understand science" into your posts.
Do you have children and do you let them tell you how to raise them? Do you punish them for bad behavior, in the many different ways, like time outs, extra chores or whatever?

The point being, if a person is ignorant enough to let children do whatever they want with no consequences, what do you expect?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#11199 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
So your still to stupid to understand that all stars, planets and such that spin and revolve, as in a stable orbit, will not encroach on a another planet or star, because they have their own stable orbit.
One world cannot move into another worlds stable orbit. While gravity holds it in place, it will repulse any other planet sized entity.
Hey you morons, comets and asteroids are not planet sized worlds.
Ok, you can talk about god now, because your too stupid to understand science.
So....

...according to your (snicker) "science", black holes -- which can rotate at velocities approaching the speed of light -- cannot, or will not gobble up other stars, planets, or any other celestial object (whether or not those objects are spinning themselves) that gets too close to them.

THAT is your position?

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#11200 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have children and do you let them tell you how to raise them? Do you punish them for bad behavior, in the many different ways, like time outs, extra chores or whatever?
The point being, if a person is ignorant enough to let children do whatever they want with no consequences, what do you expect?
Do your parents know you are using their PC?
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11201 Jul 20, 2012
Would you allow your children to speak ignorantly and maliciously about you or others? Would you stick around another persons house, where children are allowed such?

For me, the same applies here, all that speak to science, without purposeful and ignorance are respected and those that aren't, pay a price. If everyone here that truly loves science were to treat these childish polluters as they treat others, they would quit.

If you don't want too, don't, but then you don't speak here very much and you challenge even less.
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11202 Jul 20, 2012
Stupid children change the subject when they have nothing else,
Mugwump

UK

#11203 Jul 20, 2012
Psychology wrote:
A person of science gives proof. The rest just run off at the mouth about other people.
Still not understanding the difference between proof and evidence - why am I not surprised
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11204 Jul 20, 2012
Black holes are the effect of too much energy. The cause is the combined spinning motion of the entire galaxy.
Psychology

Ardsley, NY

#11205 Jul 20, 2012
Anyone that can challenge and rebutt the words of another should do so, the rest use childish innuendo, aimed at people, as they refuse to speak to science.

Thanks moron

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Stem Cell Research Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
fetal stem cell treatment (Feb '06) Feb 18 Whitney 2,783
Penis enlargement using stem cells (May '10) Feb 14 Sfp777 33
News Vatican will finance adult stem cell research (Apr '10) Feb 12 Pessimistic1 29
Stemcell pioneers of Feinerman FEIRNERMAN NO!!!!! (Mar '12) Jan '17 Shannon Randall 8
News Area residents urged to join Sirens for Life bl... (Jul '09) Jan '17 other sirens 8
News Jonathan Pitre to have Christmas in Minnesota a... Dec '16 Ron 1
News BioStem Technologies, Inc. (OTC Pink: BSEM) Ope... Nov '16 kuhnstefanie 1
More from around the web