Not everyone believes in pseudoscience:It's not ad hominem when the claim has been thoroughly torn apart and yet you still insist on it.
The Scientific Method defines good science, not consensus.What choice do we have? You keep acting stupid. The experiment idea has crashed and burned. There's nothing else to do but attack the stupid idiot that keeps dragging it back up.
You don't have to be a scientist to promote the scientific method.We ask how you would do the experiment, and you reply that's not your job. You're just a layman, you say. Well, why don't you lay off the experiment bullshit since you're just a layman?
We've never experimented with adding CO2 to the air with our fossil fuel use; there was no control. Now, if you wanted to burn a known large amount of fossil fuel to measure the increase in atmospheric CO2, go for it.So a single subject experimental paradigm for for climate change would be to stop pumping greenhouse gases into the air since we have already seen, and experimented with, what adding them will do.
Such an experiment hasn't been published in any peer reviewed journal.