That is why creationist "peer review" is such a joke. It does not even take an expert in the field to debunk Creager, or almost any other creationist paper.<quoted text>
You got that right. Too many Hoegartens and Canadian Club.
Oh well. Happens occasionally.
Nevertheless, Creager's paper is in the dustbin, and he would not even pass a first year physics course. Whoever "peer reviewed" that paper should be embarrassed.
And as much as creationists hate real peer review they have never been able to demonstrate any bias by it.