Predictably, Dogen, you didn't post anything relevant due to your lack of understanding of scientific logic.
I'm well aware of molecular homology, and of the fairytales that have been fabricated to propp up evolution.
Molecular homology is entirely consistent with ID.
You and Chimney have failed to explain how cytochrome C could have evolved in the first place,
Chimney suggested that many contingencies were possible...fair enough. But infinite possibilities are not.
As you don't have any knowledge or understanding of science, you taking shots at my understanding comes up empty.
molecular homology is well supported science.
molecular homology does not support I.D.
Nothing supports I.D.(at least to date).
P1. Cyt-C Exists.
P2. Anything that exists is possible.
C: Therefore: Cyt-C is possible.
We call that "scientific logic".