Global Warming Melts Away

[Earthling-1]

donkey wrote:

And of course, the fact that she's on your side on the Warming issue has nothing to do with it, right, Dung?

Correct, donk, I make the same allowances for alarmist dyslexics.

kristy wrote:

Nor does the fact that you have only her word for this, er, "gift."

I've lived with a dyslexic for over 40 years, they're easy to spot.

[harvey]

i own SPACIE-ODIE wrote:

<quoted text>
Get bent yourself dips*t.
YOU are HERE to TELL us YOU and EVERYONE YOU RESPECT,
THOUGHT Mike Mann's MATH was R.E.A.L:
for T.E.N. YEARS.
You've tried AGAIN and AGAIN to spout your CREATIONIST (AL GORE)
JOURNALISM as SCIENCE:
when YOU and EVERYONE YOU KNOW thought a T.R.E.E.
is capable of being an ACCURATE HEAT SENSOR.
So you're D.O.N.E.
You'll be KNOWN BY THAT LEGACY the DAY you post the LAST
'GUBMUNT GOTTA REED MUH T.R.E.E.M.O.M.E.T.E.R. FER ME'
RANT.

Oh, look, the loony's back under a new name. What up, freak? LOL

[harvey]

Earthdung-0 wrote:

<quoted text>Correct, donk, I make the same allowances for alarmist dyslexics.<quoted text>I've lived with a dyslexic for over 40 years, they're easy to spot.

I'm calling 'bullshit' on both claims, Dung. Just you justifying Denier favoritism, that's all.

As if anyone cares...

[harvey]

teeny tiny tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Again you are guilty of what you accuse other of. When have you been willing to accept facts that disprove what you want to believe. I be willing to bet that you would claim that no exist when plenty have been presented here.
What you really are is a useful tool to those like me. We love to spin you up because you appear to be that rabid hater which no one want to be like.
It is also funny you call others a troll when you are the definition of one. All hate and bluster and no fact. But that is fine. You are the best tool the skeptics could ever have. And the best thing is that you are to stupid to stop doing what you do.

Teeny Anne - 3, Reality - 0.

Another shutout...LOL

[tina anne]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
Teeny Anne - 3, Reality - 0.
Another shutout...LOL

Living in dreamland again Harvey? To bad you're going to wake up and discover that the real score is harvey - 0 Tina/reality 9

[Earthling-1]

donkey wrote:

I'm calling 'bullshit' on both claims, Dung. Just you justifying Denier favoritism, that's all.
As if anyone cares...

You apparently do care, otherwise you wouldn't comment.
Ö¿Ö

[harvey]

teeny tiny tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Living in dreamland again Harvey? To bad you're going to wake up and discover that the real score is harvey - 0 Tina/reality 9

I'm sure "Tina/reality" has an even BIGGER lead over me, but then I'm only concerned with reality, not "Tina/reality." That's a place I don't care to go.:)

[harvey]

EarthDung-0 wrote:

<quoted text>You apparently do care, otherwise you wouldn't comment.
Ö¿Ö

I cared just enough to comment, exactly. Very good, you figured that one out, Dung. Well on your way to a second major revelation this month, would you say?

I'll look forward to it...:)

[harvey]

For Deniers who pooh-pooh claims that there's an attempt on the part of Deniers, right-wingers, energy corporations, and the wealthy to downplay warming and alternative energy, a little more evidence to pretend doesn't exist:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/09/1090...

"Billionaire money at work: Right-wingers are being urged to cooperate to trash President Obama's clean energy plans. The approach specifies an attack on wind turbines and provides a list of suggested approaches. So says the Guardian after viewing a confidential memorandum edited by John Droz Jr., a senior fellow at the American Tradition Institute. Senior fellow and climate-change denier.

Droz is a long-time anti-wind activist who claims the technology is unsound and the benefits non-existent. This no doubt will come as a surprise to Iowans, whose state generated 19 percent of its electricity with wind turbines in 2011.

Droz has repeatedly urged anti-wind activists to develop an "effective National PR Plan." The memo, which has been seen by reporters at The Guardian and Stephen Lacey at Think Progress, seems to be the blueprint for such a plan. ATI claims it has no connection to the memo. That may be so, but it sounds precisely like something it would produce having for years been in the business of climate-change denial, attacking state-level efforts at building renewable energy infrastructure and trashing environmental controls."

The Guardian story is here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/ma...

Money...politics....PR...Denie rism. And yet, these are exactly the kind of hypocritical scum who pretend that warming's "all about Al Gore making billions." Unbelievable....almost.

[tina anne]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sure "Tina/reality" has an even BIGGER lead over me, but then I'm only concerned with reality, not "Tina/reality." That's a place I don't care to go.:)

I would love to claim it as my reality but I just one of trillions sharing this reality unlike what you have which is a one man show.