Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Obama Bitches

United States

#103141 Aug 11, 2014
RNC Rightwing NUT Cases wrote:
<quoted text>
You are as STUPID as you are SHAMELESS ...
But I do love watching you LOSE YOUR SHIT AND FREAK OUT!!!!
hahahahahahahaha
"RNC Rightwing NUT Cases", funny-this blogger is nothing more than "Yellow Dawg Demonrat" releasing his frustrations over the ridicule of his Obama butt kissing propagandist comments!
RNC Rightwing NUT Cases

Saint Louis, MO

#103142 Aug 11, 2014
Obama Bitches wrote:
<quoted text>
"RNC Rightwing NUT Cases", funny-this blogger is nothing more than "Yellow Dawg Demonrat" releasing his frustrations over the ridicule of his Obama butt kissing propagandist comments!
"Obama Bitches" funny-this blogger is nothing more than a "psychotic mental patient with internet access" releasing his frustrations over the ridicule of his Tea-Fascist propagandist comments!
RNC Rightwing NUT Cases

Saint Louis, MO

#103143 Aug 11, 2014
Obama Bitches wrote:
<quoted text>
You idolize Mau as in your heading!
You carry a picture of him everywhere you commie Obama Bitch Bas-Turd!!!!
You Idolize Jefferson Davis in your RACIST heading

You carry a Confederate Flag everywhere, you Racist Tea-Facist Bitch Bas-Turd!!!!

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103144 Aug 11, 2014
[QUOTE who="REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT. "]<quoted text>Ah yes, when you can't defend Obama, your bullshit has been shot down, resort to blaming Bush.
Too bad that doesn't work either since it was the Bush admin that discovered the problems, took them to the Democrat controlled Congress in 2008, and they failed to act. It was Bush who informed Obama there was problems and asked him to get Congress (since it was a Democrat controlled Congress) to do something and they ignored him.
Nice try dipshit but no matter what you try to do, the buck stops with Obama and the failure to act on the VA falls solely on the veteran hating Democrats.
If blame excuses were food stamps you would be eating like a king.[/QUOTE]

Michelle Obama: The Fact That Over 58,000 Vets Are Homeless Should 'Horrify' Us

http://bit.ly/1u1Nbpn

House GOP poised to kill veterans-aid bill (07/25/2014)

(They pulled it off! The Senate bill is still "in committee" in a fruitless effort to merge the Senate bill with the House bill. In the meantime, ALL congresspersons are off on their happy little golfing vacations, oblivious to the plight of the veterans.)

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/house...

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103145 Aug 11, 2014
[QUOTE who="REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT. "]<quoted text>Kennedy was a Democrat, he damn sure wasn't a Liberal. No Liberal would ever say his famous "ask not" statement. Liberals would say "ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you".
Kennedy had a backbone. He stood up to the Soviet Union. Liberals have no backbone. Kennedy was a leader. Liberals don't know how to lead. Kennedy loved America and fought for it in WWII. Liberals hate veterans. Kennedy believed in the Constitution. Liberals shred and spit on the Constitution.[/QUOTE]

Oh, my -- you show your lack of knowledge.

On Sept. 14, 1960, John F. Kennedy accepted the nomination of the New York LIBERAL PARTY for president. In that speech, here is what JFK said about his being a liberal:

{QUOTE} What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label "Liberal?" If by "Liberal" they mean, as they want people to believe, someone who is soft in his policies abroad, who is against local government, and who is unconcerned with the taxpayer's dollar, then the record of this party and its members demonstrate that we are not that kind of "Liberal." But if by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties -- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."

But first, I would like to say what I understand the word "Liberal" to mean and explain in the process why I consider myself to be a "Liberal," and what it means in the presidential election of 1960.

In short, having set forth my view -- I hope for all time -- two nights ago in Houston, on the proper relationship between church and state, I want to take the opportunity to set forth my views on the proper relationship between the state and the citizen. This is my political credo:

I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves.

Our liberalism has its roots in our diverse origins. Most of us are descended from that segment of the American population which was once called an immigrant minority. Today, along with our children and grandchildren, we do not feel minor. We feel proud of our origins and we are not second to any group in our sense of national purpose. For many years New York represented the new frontier to all those who came from the ends of the earth to find new opportunity and new freedom, generations of men and women who fled from the despotism of the czars, the horrors of the Nazis, the tyranny of hunger, who came here to the new frontier in the State of New York. These men and women, a living cross section of American history, indeed, a cross section of the entire world's history of pain and hope, made of this city not only a new world of opportunity, but a new world of the spirit as well....{END QUOTE}

For more of JFK on being a Liberal, read his entire speech on:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/fe...

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103146 Aug 11, 2014
Muslim in the White House wrote:
... Obama Escorted By SWAT Team And Snipers On Dangerous Vineyard Golf Course
~ Vineyard can get really dangerous with all those rich people around. Meanwhile Yazidis, Christians and others flee for their very lives in Iraq.
http://weaselzippers.us/196057-obama-escorted... .../
With people like you fomenting violence against President Obama, everywhere is dangerous for him. And ... you hypocrite ... know it.

You don't know much about being a manager, do you? The President is a manager ... the chief executive officer of this government. He does not personally go to Pakistan to get Osama bin Laden. He sends the professionals ... in this case, the US Navy SEALS ... to do the job.

In your efforts at propaganda, you foolishly try to imply that President Obama should personally go to Iraq to right the wrongs which have resulted from Bush43's foolish and illegal invasion of Iraq.

No. The president will give the orders to send the professionals ... in this case US fighter pilots of aircraft, which have already inflicted more than "pinpricks" against the ISIS. As of yesterday, the Kurds had retaken two cities formerly held by ISIS.

Really, how can you be so hate-filled against this administration? Because you LOST? TWICE? Because you do not believe in democracy? Anything else?
Dawg Delusions

Columbia, MO

#103150 Aug 11, 2014
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
With people like you fomenting violence against President Obama, everywhere is dangerous for him. And ... you hypocrite ... know it.
You don't know much about being a manager, do you? The President is a manager ... the chief executive officer of this government. He does not personally go to Pakistan to get Osama bin Laden. He sends the professionals ... in this case, the US Navy SEALS ... to do the job.
In your efforts at propaganda, you foolishly try to imply that President Obama should personally go to Iraq to right the wrongs which have resulted from Bush43's foolish and illegal invasion of Iraq.
No. The president will give the orders to send the professionals ... in this case US fighter pilots of aircraft, which have already inflicted more than "pinpricks" against the ISIS. As of yesterday, the Kurds had retaken two cities formerly held by ISIS.
Really, how can you be so hate-filled against this administration? Because you LOST? TWICE? Because you do not believe in democracy? Anything else?
" In your efforts at propaganda, you foolishly try to imply that President Obama should personally go to Iraq to right the wrongs which have resulted from Bush43's foolish and illegal invasion of Iraq." Obama would be safe over there and you and I both know why...... Oh by the way, what do you think Iraq would be like if we overthrown Hussein back then???
Hal Miller

Sikeston, MO

#103151 Aug 11, 2014
[QUOTE who="REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT. "]<quoted text>Fine he was an early 60's liberal before Liberals became America hating, welfare addicted, too lazy to work, left wing communist scum. Based on who he was, what he stood for, and the things he did I have 100% confidence he would not be part of of what Liberals have become today. He was a "Liberal" that could be respected even if you didn't agree with everything he did and before the Democrat party was hijacked by left wing domestic terrorist extremists. Liberals today are nothing but scum worthy of absolutely no respect whatsoever.
I suppose I could have posted some bullshit about a .99 correlation instead of admitting my mistake and reevaluating my statement. But that is what idiot Liberals since they are too full of shit to just man'up.[/QUOTE]

I see.

So when John F. Kennedy said that he is a liberal, he did not mean that he was a liberal -- he meant that he was a liberal.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103152 Aug 11, 2014
[QUOTE who="REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT. "]<quoted text> ... I suppose I could have posted some bullshit about a .99 correlation instead of admitting my mistake and reevaluating my statement. But that is what idiot Liberals since they are too full of shit to just man'up.[/QUOTE]

You always do post some bovine excretion. Why should we ever expect you to do anything differently?

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103153 Aug 11, 2014
REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>Ya it should horrify you Moo-chelle. Maybe your time would be better spent trying to help them instead of running around acting like the food Nazi telling parents what they should and shouldn't feed their kid while you and your hypocrite husband eat the stuff you tell others not to eat.
Maybe if Harry Reid could pass a clean bill and not try to use our veterans as a way for him to pass all his little attachments and garbage it would get done. Shame on him and the Senate Dems for using the people who have to this nation for him to try and blackmail the House.
1. So the FLOTUS is trying to get our children to eat better meals. And thus you call her a "food Nazi." Another validation of "Godwin's Law."

2. So the TeaPublicans in the House refusing to agree with the veteran's bill passed by a 93 - 3 vote in the Senate is Harry Reid's fault? Explain.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103154 Aug 11, 2014
Dawg Delusions wrote:
<quoted text> " In your efforts at propaganda, you foolishly try to imply that President Obama should personally go to Iraq to right the wrongs which have resulted from Bush43's foolish and illegal invasion of Iraq." Obama would be safe over there and you and I both know why...... Oh by the way, what do you think Iraq would be like if we overthrown Hussein back then???
I think that -- now as then -- Iraq would not pose a serious threat to the US. When a superpower invades a third-world country with no serious mass-destructive weaponry and with the US having no reason to do so, it is just like on a school playground: bullying.

I hope that our United States of America has not turned into a bully.
Dawg Delusions

Rock Port, MO

#103155 Aug 11, 2014
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that -- now as then -- Iraq would not pose a serious threat to the US. When a superpower invades a third-world country with no serious mass-destructive weaponry and with the US having no reason to do so, it is just like on a school playground: bullying.
I hope that our United States of America has not turned into a bully.
They are beheading children. Their goal is to put their flag in the White House. They are committing genocide. What part of that can you not understand. Bullying??? I have mentioned more than once that you were psychologically scarred as a youth and obviously have never gotten over it. Liberals cry for freedom, but seem deaf to the measures that are unfortunately necessary to achieve it when fighting PURE EVIL, not mere bullies.....

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103156 Aug 11, 2014
Dawg Delusions wrote:
<quoted text> They are beheading children. Their goal is to put their flag in the White House. They are committing genocide. What part of that can you not understand. Bullying??? I have mentioned more than once that you were psychologically scarred as a youth and obviously have never gotten over it. Liberals cry for freedom, but seem deaf to the measures that are unfortunately necessary to achieve it when fighting PURE EVIL, not mere bullies.....
You search the world for instances of inequity, and blame Obama, or liberals, or all Muslims, or somebody, for it.

Yes. They are beheading children. And committing genocide. And you conclude that this will somehow "put their flag in the White House."

Do you seriously think that the US will not defend herself? To think otherwise is to ignore the past.

Yeah, you have mentioned more than once that I was psychologically scarred as a youth, and YOU obviously have never gotten over it, since you continue to spread your delusions.

Now I agree that constant warfare will put a lot of money in the coffers of the companies that produce arms for the "military-industrial complex" that President Eisenhower warned us against.

Also -- do you really think that Hussein would have tolerated ISIS in his country? Tell us all about it. You have enough fantasies to go around.(Note that Hussein did not tolerate Al Quaeda in his country. Explain that, dreamer.)
Dawg Delusions

Rock Port, MO

#103158 Aug 11, 2014
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
You search the world for instances of inequity, and blame Obama, or liberals, or all Muslims, or somebody, for it.
Yes. They are beheading children. And committing genocide. And you conclude that this will somehow "put their flag in the White House."
Do you seriously think that the US will not defend herself? To think otherwise is to ignore the past.
Yeah, you have mentioned more than once that I was psychologically scarred as a youth, and YOU obviously have never gotten over it, since you continue to spread your delusions.
Now I agree that constant warfare will put a lot of money in the coffers of the companies that produce arms for the "military-industrial complex" that President Eisenhower warned us against.
Also -- do you really think that Hussein would have tolerated ISIS in his country? Tell us all about it. You have enough fantasies to go around.(Note that Hussein did not tolerate Al Quaeda in his country. Explain that, dreamer.)
You either cannot read, are psychotic, or are the biggest dyslexic with word comprehension . You choose...."I" did not say anything to conclude the flag in the White House, the BAD guys did !!! Had we not invaded Iraq earlier there would not have been "side" we could supply arms to, the whole place would have been TERRORISTS by now. Which came first, the bad guys of the world, or the industrial complex?
Obama Bitches

United States

#103162 Aug 11, 2014
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that -- now as then -- Iraq would not pose a serious threat to the US. When a superpower invades a third-world country with no serious mass-destructive weaponry and with the US having no reason to do so, it is just like on a school playground: bullying.
I hope that our United States of America has not turned into a bully.
Stupid liberal Demonratic bas-turds,,,just setting up the next Republican president for another 911.

The same way Clinton did for Bush.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103164 Aug 11, 2014
Dawg Delusions wrote:
<quoted text> You either cannot read, are psychotic, or are the biggest dyslexic with word comprehension . You choose...."I" did not say anything to conclude the flag in the White House, the BAD guys did !!! Had we not invaded Iraq earlier there would not have been "side" we could supply arms to, the whole place would have been TERRORISTS by now. Which came first, the bad guys of the world, or the industrial complex?
Huh? The bad guys put their flag in the White House? Perhaps I missed it. No doubt it was on FOX NEWS.

You can define "terrorists" most any way you wish, but ISIS would not have been in Iraq, like Al Quaeda was not in Iraq. Hussein ran a tight ship. The US supported him in his war against Iran.

I suppose -- if I have to speculate -- the bad guys of the world and the military-industrial complex are co-dependent.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103169 Aug 11, 2014
REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>1. First of all she wasn't elected to anything. She has no power to be telling anyone what they should and should not be feeding their kids, or threatening Congress not to mess with her "school lunch standards". She has one job and one job only....
Gee whiz! I wisht I wuz as smart az yew, Pat-rat!

Certainly NOBODY would agree with the FLOTUS about school lunches! Absolutely NOBODY!

Except for nearly 500 former military officers -- according to Politico, in an Aug. 11, 2014, article entitled "Retired generals back FLOTUS in food fight"

{QUOTE} Mission: Readiness, a group of nearly 500 former military leaders, is planning to “storm the Hill” when Congress comes back to town next month and urge lawmakers to keep new school nutrition standards intact.

“We’re not going to retreat our way out of the problem,” said Lt. Gen. Norman Seip, who served in the Air Force for 35 years and is now a vocal advocate for the group.

Formed in 2008, Mission: Readiness aims to ensure kids are healthy and educated enough to serve in the military — or just be productive civilians. For the top military brass, the obesity epidemic is increasingly seen as a threat to national security.

About 75 percent of young adults are not eligible to serve in the military because of obesity, lack of education and/or criminal records, according to Defense Department data cited by the retired military leaders.

The organization strongly backed the 2010 Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, a bipartisan law that overhauled the National School Lunch Program and set new health standards for all food sold in schools. Now, the admirals and generals are gearing up for a back-to-school campaign to ensure that Congress doesn’t weaken the standards this school year — or in 2015, when the law is set to be reauthorized.

The new requirements, a few of which are kicking in this school year, mandate more fruits and vegetables and less fat and sodium, and require all cereal grains — from bread to tortillas — be whole grain-rich. The Department of Agriculture notes that more than 90 percent of schools have so far complied with the phased-in rules — and USDA has granted many new flexibilities for schools — but some school districts are still struggling. They say the standards are too prescriptive and kids are turning away from school cafeterias.{END QUOTE}

Of course, since you were never in the military, I am sure you think that you know much more about all this than the nearly 500 "Mission: Readiness" officers and the Dept. of Defense, which says that obesity keeps many young adults from serving in the US military.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/michell...
RNC Rightwing NUT Cases

Saint Louis, MO

#103170 Aug 11, 2014
REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text>
You can quit proving how clueless you are, we all believe you already. It's probably the only thing you are honest about.
Are you that clueless to what is going on?

Maybe you should check things out before flapping your gums and showing how clueless you are...SHITville all you do is SUCK...badly!!!!
RNC Rightwing NUT Cases

Saint Louis, MO

#103171 Aug 11, 2014
Obama Bitches wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid liberal Demonratic bas-turds,,,just setting up the next Republican president for another 911.
The same way Clinton did for Bush.
You can quit proving how clueless you are, we all believe you already.... probably the only thing you are honest about...is the SUCTION out of your ass!

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#103174 Aug 11, 2014
REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT wrote:
<quoted text> ...
2. Hey STUPID.....
Senate passes veterans' health bill
WASHINGTON — The Senate passed a compromise bill allowing veterans to seek private care and adding $17 billion to the Department of Veterans Affairs to hire doctors to address long wait lists. The final vote in favor was 91-3.
The bill, which was rushed through before the August recess so it could be sent to President Obama, would require VA to make up $5 billion by taking it from other programs.
The House passed the compromise bill earlier this week.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/201...
Senate easily approves $16B bill to overhaul VA; already passed by the House
(CNN)— The Senate on Thursday night easily approved a $16 billion bill to overhaul the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The measure that won overwhelming House approval a day earlier now goes to President Barack Obama for his signature.
http://q13fox.com/2014/07/31/senate-easily-ap...
WHAT DO THE ARTICLES SAY? HERE LET ME HELP YOU...
The House passed the compromise bill earlier this week.
...AND....
The measure that won overwhelming House approval a day earlier
LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE CAUGHT IN YET ANOTHER LIE.
ROFLMAO!!!
You are correct. The Veterans bill, H.R. 3230, was signed into law by President Obama last Thursday, August 7.

This is nit-picky but you made a couple of errors above. The House passed the bill on July 30, which is not "earlier this week." You are only off by about two weeks, but for you that's not all that bad.

The Senate passed the bill on July 31. When you say "The House passed the compromise bill earlier this week, you actually mean the Senate. Those houses of congress all look alike, and I will not criticize you for being confused.

You were actually fairly close on this one, which is quite an improvement.

Did you notice that the TeaPartiers in the House insisted on the VA improving veterans' healthcare BY TAKING $5 BILLION FROM OTHER VA SERVICES? That's quite a "gift." The House giveth, and the House taketh awayeth!

When the veterans lose those $5 billion services, don't come crying to us that the Democrats did it! You have a habit of doing that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Danger!!! Stay away from East St. Louis! (Aug '14) 35 min tru fact 40
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 44 min Bubba Boyo 20,084
News March, civil disobedience planned next month in... 3 hr mammy 22
pure pleasure adult bookstore (Mar '11) 22 hr Ronald Sylvester 40
Hogan bad rap good Jul 31 Aunt T Histiimine 1
News Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... (Aug '14) Jul 28 Anonymous of Indy 6,407
Ice man Jul 28 Anonymous 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

St. Louis Mortgages