Maxipad, I watched that Senate Hearing on Benghazi. But you posted one sentence of what Hillary said. There was a lot of badgering coming from Issa during his witch hunt Hearing. Hillary tried to tell Issa that as far as anyone knows, Al Qaeda had nothing to do with the attacks. But no, Issa continued to insist that it was Al Qaeda. Then Hillary responded to Issa's stupidity and said, "What difference does it make. Four of our people died, because your party cut funding for embassy security, even though I warned you that this could happen." Then Issa shut his stupid mouth and had no more questions for Hillary. Bingo!<quoted text>
IT ONLY TOOK 15 MONTHS FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SPELL BENGHAZI
“First of all, I want to congratulate The New York Times. It only took 15 months for them to figure out how to spell Benghazi,” Gowdy said in an interview on Fox News.“So, in another 15 months, maybe their reporting will actually catch up with the truth.”
The New York Times report on Benghazi suggests there is no evidence linking al Qaeda to the 2012 terror attack on the U.S. compound in Libya. The report also revives the long-debunked claim that the attacks were sparked by an anti-Islam video, even though intelligence officials have asserted it was a methodically planned assault.
“Whether it was al Qaeda or a subsidiary or a holding company or a limited partnership, to quote Hillary Clinton,‘What difference does it make?’ Who cares whether it was al Qaeda proper or a subsidiary? Four Americans are dead, and it wasn’t a spontaneous reaction to a video. It was planned,”
So you need not take a response by Hillary Clinton to Darrel Issa out of context to slant what was said in your favor. Stop using your blame game against democrats, when the security problem at Benghazi was what republicans voted for in the House of Representatives, led by your Tea Party radicals. Nice try though, Maxipad.