“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91651 Dec 16, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
You just proved my point! You have no sense at all. You are the socialist..........remember? I don't need to watch any stupid video either. Taking things out as context as usual. What else should I expect from you!
30 yrs. old right now with your wisdom..........you'd be on welfare!...
Oh, PLEASE! Don't watch the video. Demand your right to remain unaware and closed-minded!

If I were 30 years old with my technical college degrees, I would be making $100K or more. That's hardly "welfare."

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91652 Dec 16, 2013
Global Warming fail wrote:
<quoted text>
Junk scientists are not always right. The real scientists who have proven that Global Warming is a hoax are being forced to keep their mouths shut."Global Warming" isn't about "saving the earth". It's about seeing how much money they can get out of people like you who actually fall for it.
"Say What" posted this link to NASA photography which shows the decline of sea ice from 1980 to 2012:

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/thi...

These photos CLEARLY show that "Global Warming" exists. They do not prove a cause. If you have no concern about the effects of "Global Warming," you are attempting to live in a vacuum. There is a world beyond Piggott.

“So it's not you, It's them?”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#91653 Dec 16, 2013
Global Warming fail wrote:
<quoted text>
Junk scientists are not always right. The real scientists who have proven that Global Warming is a hoax are being forced to keep their mouths shut."Global Warming" isn't about "saving the earth". It's about seeing how much money they can get out of people like you who actually fall for it.
I see that you "forgot" to provide a legit site to support your 110% claim in your earlier post. A rational person can only conclude from your not doing so that no such legit site exists. Put up or shut up! Take your time. We'll wait...

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91654 Dec 16, 2013
Shep wrote:
And the Spirit and the bride say , Come . And let him that heareth say , Come . And let him that is athirst come . And whosoever will , let him take the water of life freely.
Lot and His Daughters Genesis 19:30-38 (NIV)

30 Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave. 31 One day the older daughter said to the younger,“Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth. 32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”

33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger,“Last night I slept with my father. Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.” 35 So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

36 So both of Lot’s daughters became pregnant by their father. 37 The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab; he is the father of the Moabites of today. 38 The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi; he is the father of the Ammonites of today.

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91655 Dec 16, 2013
Guest wrote:
Good luck on getting change. As long as the big corporations and elites are pouring millions into election campaigns, no change will come. And the U.S. Supreme Court did not help matters with its ruling on the Voting Rights Act this year. We are represented by politicans that are bought and paid for. No average persbn can compete with big money being poured into the election process without accountability. I would love to see the electoral process playing field leveled so we all could all be equally represented. But as history tells us, 3rd party candidates have never faired well in national and state elections.
<quoted text>
Totally agree. And agree with your other posts.

Topix is allowing someone to change my "judging," so that when I give a "agree" it turns into a "disagree," and so forth. So I guess I will have to "judge" by making a comment.

Here on Topix, "CP" is making the cardinal mistake. His posts are BORING. Mere regurgitation of the Constitution, or of what he thinks the Constitution means, or should mean. "CP" takes up a lot of space, but he is harmless.

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91656 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
How come you attack the source but then fail to disprove anything that was posted? I read them all and nothing seems "fake" about the stories. The only thing that seems fake is you. I've noticed that you left wingnuts always attack the source but never take up the challenge of proving your claims or disproving the story. Why is that?
Sort of like you just did, "Savannah"?_8-)_Why IS that?

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91657 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text> ... Jesus was a lot of things but one thing he was not was a supporter of ... homosexuality ...
Gee! Jesus was always running around with guys. Sort of makes you wonder.

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91658 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
You really have some serious personal issues don't ya? Grow up and get some help.
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.

“Vote for Cruz -- you LOSE!”

Since: Sep 09

LOL @ "COW HIDE" Dan!

#91659 Dec 16, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that you "forgot" to provide a legit site to support your 110% claim in your earlier post. A rational person can only conclude from your not doing so that no such legit site exists. Put up or shut up! Take your time. We'll wait...
Hey, "Chilli J"! We can SEE the effects of "Global Warming" as we watch the iceberg in your icon slowly sink down into the sea!
Attacker of BS

Poplar Bluff, MO

#91660 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
How come you attack the source but then fail to disprove anything that was posted? I read them all and nothing seems "fake" about the stories. The only thing that seems fake is you. I've noticed that you left wingnuts always attack the source but never take up the challenge of proving your claims or disproving the story. Why is that?
Why is it that you believe everything you read on the internet. You call me fake, but where is your source, dearie? Not one word of your post proves your claim. Just because you read it, it all of a sudden becomes truth. I am still laughing at your reasoning. The far righties go so far around the circle that they meet the far lefties. There is no difference between the two of them. All the "crazies" left and right outright lie on the news all the time. I am surprised that you have not noticed the flawed news flying around the media. By the way, sweetie, I am a moderate republican who can see all the bs on the right and left. So try as you may, you know darn well I speak the truth about this matter.

Attacker of BS

Poplar Bluff, MO

#91661 Dec 16, 2013
Global Warming fail wrote:
<quoted text>
Junk scientists are not always right. The real scientists who have proven that Global Warming is a hoax are being forced to keep their mouths shut."Global Warming" isn't about "saving the earth". It's about seeing how much money they can get out of people like you who actually fall for it.
NASA scientists are junk scientists? But the real scientists, whom you did not document, are being forced to keep their mouths shut? Do you realize how stupid you appear to be. I believe global warming is real. Ocean levels are rising, due to the melting glaciers. The atmosphere is heating up 2% warmer every year and causing extreme weather like we have never seen before. And guess what? It has not cost "people like me" one red cent.

Where do you crazies come up with all this bs? Let me guess--from the same Tea Party idiots, who believe that it is God's will if a woman gets raped and conceives. If you possess any intelligence, you would glean information from all sides, then make educated conclusions about science. You jump on one side and declare it to be absolute truth. Try to be more eclectic. It will serve you well.
GOPee CRUZifying America

Saint Louis, MO

#91662 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.
Savannah is the perfect name for her...
because that is where her people lived, after they climbed down out of the trees.. LOL

GAME POINT!
Jezeus

Poplar Bluff, MO

#91663 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
I love how you left wingnuts try to pretend Jesus would have supported your views and yet you are the same ones who are trying to remove him from everything. If Jesus was such a socialist then why do you do that?
Jesus was a lot of things but one thing he was not was a supporter of abortion, homosexuality, and punishing success while rewarding laziness. Your logic is a just another sad attempt to tear down Christianity in the eyes of those who practice it. It's what you leftwing nuts do. Remember, it is love your neighbor as yourself, not love your neighbors stuff and expect him to pay for it for you.
I love how you righty tighty nutcases fabricate a war on christmas and now a war on JC. No such thing exists. It is only a figment of your Taliban-like flawed imagination.How can you pretend that you know what JC would or would not have suppported. Neither abortion or homosexuality are mentioned anywhere in the NT. The writers of the NT did not even know jesus. The first books of the NT were written from 70 AD and onward. Jesus was long gone by that time.

But jesus did mention how hard it would be for a rich man to get into heaven. Why is that so? Jesus did not punish success that was gained through honest means. However, most wealthy people today either inherited their wealth from dishonest ancestors who cheated people out of their property, or are currently creating wealth on the backs honest, hardworking people by cheating them out of their property. Either way, these elitists did not attain wealth in an honest way. The same thing was happening in Jesus's day. There is nothing new under the sun.

Nobody is trying to take your jesus away from you christians. If you like your jesus, you can keep him. But don't expect everybody to believe in your doctrines, because we have been there and done that. And, we moved on beyond your religious fables. America is a melting pot with various religious beliefs. Why should chrisitanity be able to claim special rights on a mult-religious country. The forefathers of this country were not christians. Go study history and find these facts out for yourselves. They were gnostics and Noahides (Masons) who came from Britain to escape the rule of the Church of England, who forced them to practice their religions underground. They came to America for religious freedom. And now christians don't want any other religion in their JESUSLAND!
Go figure!
Constitution Party

Farmington, MO

#91664 Dec 16, 2013
CELEBRATE THE BILL OF RIGHTS: Fifth Amendment!

Too often we only focus on one concept found in the 5th Amendment, that American citizens cannot be compelled to testify against themselves in a criminal case. But we also find that Americans cannot be deprived of Life without due process of law, which begs the question as to how abortion (the taking of a human life without due process) could ever have been considered authorized by the Constitution. Rather it is quite clear that the 5th Amendment protects human Life and does not give any right to destroy it at will.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
1 who knows

Columbia, MO

#91665 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee! Jesus was always running around with guys. Sort of makes you wonder.
Dawg, isn't it about time to quit blaming God/Jesus for your heartache and losses. We both know what I am referring to. Many hurt souls like you become angry and narcissistic. It gives you a sense of control in an out of control world, thus, turning some people away from Christianity. God, the wealthy, the neighbor down the street, all become targets where you aim your confused frustration instead of forgiveness or acceptance of power beyond your own.Don't feel alone Dawg, many have come before you, and many will follow. Make sure your reply or lack there of doesn't reflect your "Obama" like transparency. Merry CHRISTmas
Constitution Party

Farmington, MO

#91666 Dec 16, 2013
Darrell Castle talks about negotiations between the United States and Afghanistan for a new Status of Forces Agreement.

http://www.castlereport.us/afghanistan-leave -...
Brain Dead Liberals

Willow Springs, MO

#91667 Dec 16, 2013
A GROWING NUMBER OF SHERIFFS AREN’T HAPPY WITH NEW GUN CONTROL LAWS — AND THEY’VE VOWED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
A growing number of sheriffs and police chiefs from around the nation have vowed to oppose certain gun-control measures, according to a law enforcement organization.

The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association lists 479 sheriffs and 18 state sheriffs associations who they claim are “saying ‘no’ to Obama gun control” and “have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unconstitutional gun control measures.”

The law enforcement organization said they compiled the list based “in general” on whether a sheriff had publicly stated “an affirmation to support the constitutional Second Amendment rights of citizens in his or her jurisdiction” or affirmed “that the sheriff will follow his or her oath and uphold the Constitution.”

On Sunday, The New York Times published a profile on Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County, Colo., who is reportedly refusing to enforce new gun control measures out of concern they violate Second Amendment rights.

The Times, for instance, reported that since many sheriffs in Colorado refuse to enforce the new laws, the state’s newly adopted firearm regulations may be rendered “nearly irrelevant across much of the state’s rural regions.”

Sine July 1, 2013, the possession of a “large capacity magazine” is illegal and universal background checks are required on all private sales, according to the National Rifle Association.

But the battle is playing out across the country.

A delegation of sheriffs met with California Gov. Jerry Brown recently to “try to persuade him to veto gun bills passed by the Legislature,” The Times reported.

“Our way of life means nothing to these politicians, and our interests are not being promoted in the legislative halls of Sacramento or Washington, D.C.,” Jon E. Lopey, the sheriff of Siskiyou County, Calif., told The Times.“He said enforcing gun laws was not a priority for him, and he added that residents of his rural region near the Oregon border are equally frustrated by regulations imposed by the federal Forest Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.”

In Liberty County, Fla., a jury in October acquitted a sheriff after he released a man arrested on charges of carrying a concealed firearm. According to The Times, the sheriff was immediately reinstated by the governor.

Nevertheless, proponents of gun control measures say the laws do work.

“Particularly on background checks, the numbers show the law is working,” Eric Brown, a spokesman for Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, told The Times, noting since the law has gone into effect 70 people have been denied firearm sales.

Further, those advocating tighter gun laws have vowed to continue pushing forward and are planning to spend millions in the 2014 elections, according to Fox News.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/16/a-...
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91668 Dec 16, 2013
Attacker of BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that you believe everything you read on the internet. You call me fake, but where is your source, dearie? Not one word of your post proves your claim. Just because you read it, it all of a sudden becomes truth. I am still laughing at your reasoning. The far righties go so far around the circle that they meet the far lefties. There is no difference between the two of them. All the "crazies" left and right outright lie on the news all the time. I am surprised that you have not noticed the flawed news flying around the media. By the way, sweetie, I am a moderate republican who can see all the bs on the right and left. So try as you may, you know darn well I speak the truth about this matter.
I see you like to make up assumptions and pretend people said things they never said. I never said I believe everything that I read on the internet. What source do I need to post? I haven't said anything that needs a source. When I do I will post a source.

It is funny how you are trying to change the subject back on me instead of addressing what I said. What's wrong honey, the truth a hard pill to swallow? If the stories in the links that were posted was false then you should have no problem proving it. All you do though is just attack the source. If we were to believe you left wingnuts then the only credible news sources would be left wingnut sources. You don't speak the truth about anything. Your posts are nothing but accusations, slander, assumptions, and opinion. You couldn't even reply to me without making up things I never said.
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91669 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.
Was I talking to you? Oh yeah I guess I was. I seen the posts were you got caught admitting that is just you posting logged out. So take your own advice and shut up no matter which name youre posting under.
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91670 Dec 16, 2013
Brain Dead Liberals wrote:
A GROWING NUMBER OF SHERIFFS AREN’T HAPPY WITH NEW GUN CONTROL LAWS — AND THEY’VE VOWED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
A growing number of sheriffs and police chiefs from around the nation have vowed to oppose certain gun-control measures, according to a law enforcement organization.
The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association lists 479 sheriffs and 18 state sheriffs associations who they claim are “saying ‘no’ to Obama gun control” and “have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unconstitutional gun control measures.”
The law enforcement organization said they compiled the list based “in general” on whether a sheriff had publicly stated “an affirmation to support the constitutional Second Amendment rights of citizens in his or her jurisdiction” or affirmed “that the sheriff will follow his or her oath and uphold the Constitution.”
On Sunday, The New York Times published a profile on Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County, Colo., who is reportedly refusing to enforce new gun control measures out of concern they violate Second Amendment rights.
The Times, for instance, reported that since many sheriffs in Colorado refuse to enforce the new laws, the state’s newly adopted firearm regulations may be rendered “nearly irrelevant across much of the state’s rural regions.”
Sine July 1, 2013, the possession of a “large capacity magazine” is illegal and universal background checks are required on all private sales, according to the National Rifle Association.
But the battle is playing out across the country.
A delegation of sheriffs met with California Gov. Jerry Brown recently to “try to persuade him to veto gun bills passed by the Legislature,” The Times reported.
“Our way of life means nothing to these politicians, and our interests are not being promoted in the legislative halls of Sacramento or Washington, D.C.,” Jon E. Lopey, the sheriff of Siskiyou County, Calif., told The Times.“He said enforcing gun laws was not a priority for him, and he added that residents of his rural region near the Oregon border are equally frustrated by regulations imposed by the federal Forest Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.”
In Liberty County, Fla., a jury in October acquitted a sheriff after he released a man arrested on charges of carrying a concealed firearm. According to The Times, the sheriff was immediately reinstated by the governor.
Nevertheless, proponents of gun control measures say the laws do work.
“Particularly on background checks, the numbers show the law is working,” Eric Brown, a spokesman for Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, told The Times, noting since the law has gone into effect 70 people have been denied firearm sales.
Further, those advocating tighter gun laws have vowed to continue pushing forward and are planning to spend millions in the 2014 elections, according to Fox News.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/16/a-...
I enjoy the links you post. I may not agree with them all but they are good reading. I admire how you don't let these 2 or 3 left wingnuts that attack you get to you. Keep up the fight. We are turning the tide.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 6 hr Pastor Pooles 19,729
Missouri Fathers Rights 9 hr booboo 8
News Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... (Aug '14) 9 hr xxxrayted 6,177
Why are black people so angry and aggressive? (Aug '14) Mon GUEST 46
be wise obey the gospel acts 2 38 Sun babylon jeremiah 50 1
be wise obey the gospel Sun babylon jeremiah 50 1
Obey The Gospel BE WISE ACTS 2 38 Sun babylon jeremiah 50 1
St. Louis Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

St. Louis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]