Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#91659 Dec 16, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that you "forgot" to provide a legit site to support your 110% claim in your earlier post. A rational person can only conclude from your not doing so that no such legit site exists. Put up or shut up! Take your time. We'll wait...
Hey, "Chilli J"! We can SEE the effects of "Global Warming" as we watch the iceberg in your icon slowly sink down into the sea!
Attacker of BS

Malden, MO

#91660 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
How come you attack the source but then fail to disprove anything that was posted? I read them all and nothing seems "fake" about the stories. The only thing that seems fake is you. I've noticed that you left wingnuts always attack the source but never take up the challenge of proving your claims or disproving the story. Why is that?
Why is it that you believe everything you read on the internet. You call me fake, but where is your source, dearie? Not one word of your post proves your claim. Just because you read it, it all of a sudden becomes truth. I am still laughing at your reasoning. The far righties go so far around the circle that they meet the far lefties. There is no difference between the two of them. All the "crazies" left and right outright lie on the news all the time. I am surprised that you have not noticed the flawed news flying around the media. By the way, sweetie, I am a moderate republican who can see all the bs on the right and left. So try as you may, you know darn well I speak the truth about this matter.

Attacker of BS

Malden, MO

#91661 Dec 16, 2013
Global Warming fail wrote:
<quoted text>
Junk scientists are not always right. The real scientists who have proven that Global Warming is a hoax are being forced to keep their mouths shut."Global Warming" isn't about "saving the earth". It's about seeing how much money they can get out of people like you who actually fall for it.
NASA scientists are junk scientists? But the real scientists, whom you did not document, are being forced to keep their mouths shut? Do you realize how stupid you appear to be. I believe global warming is real. Ocean levels are rising, due to the melting glaciers. The atmosphere is heating up 2% warmer every year and causing extreme weather like we have never seen before. And guess what? It has not cost "people like me" one red cent.

Where do you crazies come up with all this bs? Let me guess--from the same Tea Party idiots, who believe that it is God's will if a woman gets raped and conceives. If you possess any intelligence, you would glean information from all sides, then make educated conclusions about science. You jump on one side and declare it to be absolute truth. Try to be more eclectic. It will serve you well.
GOPee CRUZifying America

Saint Louis, MO

#91662 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.
Savannah is the perfect name for her...
because that is where her people lived, after they climbed down out of the trees.. LOL

GAME POINT!
Jezeus

Malden, MO

#91663 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
I love how you left wingnuts try to pretend Jesus would have supported your views and yet you are the same ones who are trying to remove him from everything. If Jesus was such a socialist then why do you do that?
Jesus was a lot of things but one thing he was not was a supporter of abortion, homosexuality, and punishing success while rewarding laziness. Your logic is a just another sad attempt to tear down Christianity in the eyes of those who practice it. It's what you leftwing nuts do. Remember, it is love your neighbor as yourself, not love your neighbors stuff and expect him to pay for it for you.
I love how you righty tighty nutcases fabricate a war on christmas and now a war on JC. No such thing exists. It is only a figment of your Taliban-like flawed imagination.How can you pretend that you know what JC would or would not have suppported. Neither abortion or homosexuality are mentioned anywhere in the NT. The writers of the NT did not even know jesus. The first books of the NT were written from 70 AD and onward. Jesus was long gone by that time.

But jesus did mention how hard it would be for a rich man to get into heaven. Why is that so? Jesus did not punish success that was gained through honest means. However, most wealthy people today either inherited their wealth from dishonest ancestors who cheated people out of their property, or are currently creating wealth on the backs honest, hardworking people by cheating them out of their property. Either way, these elitists did not attain wealth in an honest way. The same thing was happening in Jesus's day. There is nothing new under the sun.

Nobody is trying to take your jesus away from you christians. If you like your jesus, you can keep him. But don't expect everybody to believe in your doctrines, because we have been there and done that. And, we moved on beyond your religious fables. America is a melting pot with various religious beliefs. Why should chrisitanity be able to claim special rights on a mult-religious country. The forefathers of this country were not christians. Go study history and find these facts out for yourselves. They were gnostics and Noahides (Masons) who came from Britain to escape the rule of the Church of England, who forced them to practice their religions underground. They came to America for religious freedom. And now christians don't want any other religion in their JESUSLAND!
Go figure!
Constitution Party

Southbury, CT

#91664 Dec 16, 2013
CELEBRATE THE BILL OF RIGHTS: Fifth Amendment!

Too often we only focus on one concept found in the 5th Amendment, that American citizens cannot be compelled to testify against themselves in a criminal case. But we also find that Americans cannot be deprived of Life without due process of law, which begs the question as to how abortion (the taking of a human life without due process) could ever have been considered authorized by the Constitution. Rather it is quite clear that the 5th Amendment protects human Life and does not give any right to destroy it at will.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
1 who knows

Columbia, MO

#91665 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee! Jesus was always running around with guys. Sort of makes you wonder.
Dawg, isn't it about time to quit blaming God/Jesus for your heartache and losses. We both know what I am referring to. Many hurt souls like you become angry and narcissistic. It gives you a sense of control in an out of control world, thus, turning some people away from Christianity. God, the wealthy, the neighbor down the street, all become targets where you aim your confused frustration instead of forgiveness or acceptance of power beyond your own.Don't feel alone Dawg, many have come before you, and many will follow. Make sure your reply or lack there of doesn't reflect your "Obama" like transparency. Merry CHRISTmas
Constitution Party

Southbury, CT

#91666 Dec 16, 2013
Darrell Castle talks about negotiations between the United States and Afghanistan for a new Status of Forces Agreement.

http://www.castlereport.us/afghanistan-leave -...
Brain Dead Liberals

Branson, MO

#91667 Dec 16, 2013
A GROWING NUMBER OF SHERIFFS AREN’T HAPPY WITH NEW GUN CONTROL LAWS — AND THEY’VE VOWED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
A growing number of sheriffs and police chiefs from around the nation have vowed to oppose certain gun-control measures, according to a law enforcement organization.

The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association lists 479 sheriffs and 18 state sheriffs associations who they claim are “saying ‘no’ to Obama gun control” and “have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unconstitutional gun control measures.”

The law enforcement organization said they compiled the list based “in general” on whether a sheriff had publicly stated “an affirmation to support the constitutional Second Amendment rights of citizens in his or her jurisdiction” or affirmed “that the sheriff will follow his or her oath and uphold the Constitution.”

On Sunday, The New York Times published a profile on Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County, Colo., who is reportedly refusing to enforce new gun control measures out of concern they violate Second Amendment rights.

The Times, for instance, reported that since many sheriffs in Colorado refuse to enforce the new laws, the state’s newly adopted firearm regulations may be rendered “nearly irrelevant across much of the state’s rural regions.”

Sine July 1, 2013, the possession of a “large capacity magazine” is illegal and universal background checks are required on all private sales, according to the National Rifle Association.

But the battle is playing out across the country.

A delegation of sheriffs met with California Gov. Jerry Brown recently to “try to persuade him to veto gun bills passed by the Legislature,” The Times reported.

“Our way of life means nothing to these politicians, and our interests are not being promoted in the legislative halls of Sacramento or Washington, D.C.,” Jon E. Lopey, the sheriff of Siskiyou County, Calif., told The Times.“He said enforcing gun laws was not a priority for him, and he added that residents of his rural region near the Oregon border are equally frustrated by regulations imposed by the federal Forest Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.”

In Liberty County, Fla., a jury in October acquitted a sheriff after he released a man arrested on charges of carrying a concealed firearm. According to The Times, the sheriff was immediately reinstated by the governor.

Nevertheless, proponents of gun control measures say the laws do work.

“Particularly on background checks, the numbers show the law is working,” Eric Brown, a spokesman for Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, told The Times, noting since the law has gone into effect 70 people have been denied firearm sales.

Further, those advocating tighter gun laws have vowed to continue pushing forward and are planning to spend millions in the 2014 elections, according to Fox News.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/16/a-...
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91668 Dec 16, 2013
Attacker of BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that you believe everything you read on the internet. You call me fake, but where is your source, dearie? Not one word of your post proves your claim. Just because you read it, it all of a sudden becomes truth. I am still laughing at your reasoning. The far righties go so far around the circle that they meet the far lefties. There is no difference between the two of them. All the "crazies" left and right outright lie on the news all the time. I am surprised that you have not noticed the flawed news flying around the media. By the way, sweetie, I am a moderate republican who can see all the bs on the right and left. So try as you may, you know darn well I speak the truth about this matter.
I see you like to make up assumptions and pretend people said things they never said. I never said I believe everything that I read on the internet. What source do I need to post? I haven't said anything that needs a source. When I do I will post a source.

It is funny how you are trying to change the subject back on me instead of addressing what I said. What's wrong honey, the truth a hard pill to swallow? If the stories in the links that were posted was false then you should have no problem proving it. All you do though is just attack the source. If we were to believe you left wingnuts then the only credible news sources would be left wingnut sources. You don't speak the truth about anything. Your posts are nothing but accusations, slander, assumptions, and opinion. You couldn't even reply to me without making up things I never said.
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91669 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.
Was I talking to you? Oh yeah I guess I was. I seen the posts were you got caught admitting that is just you posting logged out. So take your own advice and shut up no matter which name youre posting under.
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91670 Dec 16, 2013
Brain Dead Liberals wrote:
A GROWING NUMBER OF SHERIFFS AREN’T HAPPY WITH NEW GUN CONTROL LAWS — AND THEY’VE VOWED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
A growing number of sheriffs and police chiefs from around the nation have vowed to oppose certain gun-control measures, according to a law enforcement organization.
The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association lists 479 sheriffs and 18 state sheriffs associations who they claim are “saying ‘no’ to Obama gun control” and “have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unconstitutional gun control measures.”
The law enforcement organization said they compiled the list based “in general” on whether a sheriff had publicly stated “an affirmation to support the constitutional Second Amendment rights of citizens in his or her jurisdiction” or affirmed “that the sheriff will follow his or her oath and uphold the Constitution.”
On Sunday, The New York Times published a profile on Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County, Colo., who is reportedly refusing to enforce new gun control measures out of concern they violate Second Amendment rights.
The Times, for instance, reported that since many sheriffs in Colorado refuse to enforce the new laws, the state’s newly adopted firearm regulations may be rendered “nearly irrelevant across much of the state’s rural regions.”
Sine July 1, 2013, the possession of a “large capacity magazine” is illegal and universal background checks are required on all private sales, according to the National Rifle Association.
But the battle is playing out across the country.
A delegation of sheriffs met with California Gov. Jerry Brown recently to “try to persuade him to veto gun bills passed by the Legislature,” The Times reported.
“Our way of life means nothing to these politicians, and our interests are not being promoted in the legislative halls of Sacramento or Washington, D.C.,” Jon E. Lopey, the sheriff of Siskiyou County, Calif., told The Times.“He said enforcing gun laws was not a priority for him, and he added that residents of his rural region near the Oregon border are equally frustrated by regulations imposed by the federal Forest Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.”
In Liberty County, Fla., a jury in October acquitted a sheriff after he released a man arrested on charges of carrying a concealed firearm. According to The Times, the sheriff was immediately reinstated by the governor.
Nevertheless, proponents of gun control measures say the laws do work.
“Particularly on background checks, the numbers show the law is working,” Eric Brown, a spokesman for Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, told The Times, noting since the law has gone into effect 70 people have been denied firearm sales.
Further, those advocating tighter gun laws have vowed to continue pushing forward and are planning to spend millions in the 2014 elections, according to Fox News.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/16/a-...
I enjoy the links you post. I may not agree with them all but they are good reading. I admire how you don't let these 2 or 3 left wingnuts that attack you get to you. Keep up the fight. We are turning the tide.
Savannah

Trimble, MO

#91671 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee! Jesus was always running around with guys. Sort of makes you wonder.
Doesn't make me wonder. Maybe it makes someone with a perverted brain like you wonder. But then again from everything I have seen posted by you it doesn't surprise me. You're about as sharp as a marble.
Brain Dead Liberals

Branson, MO

#91672 Dec 16, 2013
Attacker of BS wrote:
<quoted text>
NASA scientists are junk scientists? But the real scientists, whom you did not document, are being forced to keep their mouths shut? Do you realize how stupid you appear to be. I believe global warming is real. Ocean levels are rising, due to the melting glaciers. The atmosphere is heating up 2% warmer every year and causing extreme weather like we have never seen before. And guess what? It has not cost "people like me" one red cent.
Where do you crazies come up with all this bs? Let me guess--from the same Tea Party idiots, who believe that it is God's will if a woman gets raped and conceives. If you possess any intelligence, you would glean information from all sides, then make educated conclusions about science. You jump on one side and declare it to be absolute truth. Try to be more eclectic. It will serve you well.
GLOBAL WARMING HOAX, Just as Al Gore the climagate WHORE! Trying to make millions off of stupid people, like you!

Because we know it for the liberal scam that it is. We are all very familiar with liberal facts. Like the liberal fact that we were all doomed to head into another ice-age during the 1970s. Or like the liberal fact that sea levels were predicted to be 10 feet higher than they are today. Or like the liberal fact that Kilimanjaro was suppose to be devoid of snow 5 years ago. Or like the liberal fact that hurricanes, cyclones, typhoons, and tornadoes were all suppose to increase number and become more severe. Do you not ever get tired of getting your liberal facts wrong?

The reality is that liberal freaks are consummate liars. The ONLY reason you support anthropological global warming is because you desperately want to be a fascist. Anthropological global warming is just another redistribution of wealth scam. Liberal freaks increase taxes on the productive to pay for their "War on the Climate," dictating every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave. A liberal fascist utopia.

One has to be a truly sick and mentally diseased individual, on the same level as Adolf Hitler or Charles Manson, to believe in anthropological global warming. That there are people who deliberately want to cause that much misery in people's lives in order to control their every move is truly disturbing.~ Originally Posted by California831

AL GORE PURCHASES HUGE NEW MAC-MANSION
Apparently Al Gore has figured out that it pays to preach green, but it costs more than its worth to actually be green. Al and Tipper Gore have purchased yet another mansion. This one overlooks the ocean in sunny Santa Barbara, California, a couple hours north of Los Angeles. The mansion has several electrically pumped fountains, six carbon burning fireplaces, five huge bedrooms, and a whopping 9 bathrooms. We don't have the square footage for this house but it looks huge to us. Image what it costs in air conditioning. We don't begrudge Al Gore buying all the house he can afford but the hypocrisy seems a little thick.
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php...

Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2013/12/cold...

Global Warming ‘pause’ may last for 20 more years and Arctic sea ice has Already Started to Recover
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2013/11/glob...

“I told you so” edition: Increasing proof that anthopogenic global warming was a scam
http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/12/05/i-told...

The UN Global Warming Hoax is Slowly Dying
http://blog.heartland.org/2013/12/the-un-glob...
Clinton-Obama agenda

United States

#91673 Dec 16, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"GoPee" is correct. The Bible tells you to shut up. So do it.
The arrogant left wing liberal Demonrat loons.

Now lets add anti-religion to the list in the take away of freedoms?

You narcistic left wing liberals are racist.
You are Anti-feminism.
You are the economic terrorists of the middle class.
You are the environmental loons.
You are anti-individual freedoms, prosperity and growth.
But you are just the stinkin minority.

No longer are we to be kind or politically correct with you.

You are done, finished, exposed due to your/Obama's arrogance.

The new Republicans must take over in 2014 & 2016. The footing is there!
Merry Shopmas

Malden, MO

#91674 Dec 16, 2013
1 who knows wrote:
<quoted text> Dawg, isn't it about time to quit blaming God/Jesus for your heartache and losses. We both know what I am referring to. Many hurt souls like you become angry and narcissistic. It gives you a sense of control in an out of control world, thus, turning some people away from Christianity. God, the wealthy, the neighbor down the street, all become targets where you aim your confused frustration instead of forgiveness or acceptance of power beyond your own.Don't feel alone Dawg, many have come before you, and many will follow. Make sure your reply or lack there of doesn't reflect your "Obama" like transparency. Merry CHRISTmas
If Dawg can draw people out of christianity with his posts, such people already had doubts about their faith. Grounded christians don't leave christianity because of anything Dawg has posted. Nice try though, but you get an "F" on this post, which is totally lame.

But that don't stop you christians from proselytiiziing for jesus, just like you have been doing feor centuries. Why? Because your tiny brains cannot wrap your thoughts around a concept that does not fit your ideology. Wow! What republican sheople you have become. Ted Cruzerites who profess to follow jesus, while they really are following the Tea Party right wing crazies. Foolish Tea Party pimps!

jeeeeeezass mowes my yard. I am sure he mowes Dawg's yard, too.
Poor Dumbies

Malden, MO

#91675 Dec 16, 2013
Don't even know the pagan roots of their own religion.....how hillarious is that!
mEAT me in st louie

Saint Louis, MO

#91676 Dec 16, 2013
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you like to make up assumptions and pretend people said things they never said. I never said I believe everything that I read on the internet. What source do I need to post? I haven't said anything that needs a source. When I do I will post a source.
It is funny how you are trying to change the subject back on me instead of addressing what I said. What's wrong honey, the truth a hard pill to swallow? If the stories in the links that were posted was false then you should have no problem proving it. All you do though is just attack the source. If we were to believe you left wingnuts then the only credible news sources would be left wingnut sources. You don't speak the truth about anything. Your posts are nothing but accusations, slander, assumptions, and opinion. You couldn't even reply to me without making up things I never said.
Savannah (what a prety name) reminds me of Africa!

Sweetheart ...The truth here, is that in your case, that "hard to pill to swallow", was the Birth Control Pill your mother should have used!

Now Savannah, go pretend that your Sarah Palin, and quit while you can...OK?
mEAT me in st louie

Saint Louis, MO

#91677 Dec 16, 2013
Poor Dumbies wrote:
Don't even know the pagan roots of their own religion.....how hillarious is that!
Game Point
Actually

Malden, MO

#91678 Dec 16, 2013
I addressed you throughly. I explained very well why I don't follow right wing or left wing news media. You did say that you read the weezalzipper site and found it to be true. Now you want to backtrack. Too late. You cannot delete your posts.

Game Point!
Savannah wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you like to make up assumptions and pretend people said things they never said. I never said I believe everything that I read on the internet. What source do I need to post? I haven't said anything that needs a source. When I do I will post a source.
It is funny how you are trying to change the subject back on me instead of addressing what I said. What's wrong honey, the truth a hard pill to swallow? If the stories in the links that were posted was false then you should have no problem proving it. All you do though is just attack the source. If we were to believe you left wingnuts then the only credible news sources would be left wingnut sources. You don't speak the truth about anything. Your posts are nothing but accusations, slander, assumptions, and opinion. You couldn't even reply to me without making up things I never said.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CIA Russia Hacked Election For Trump 1 hr Guest 1,309
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 8 hr mexico 20,845
John McCain jealous of Trump 8 hr vet 4
CBS'S John DICKerson is Dr Joseph Goebbels 10 hr Vet 2
CBS Sunday Morning Show welcomes Isis 10 hr Vet 2
Democrat's/CBS="Enemy of the People" 10 hr Vet 1
Want FAKE news?? =CBS Scott Pelley 11 hr American 8

St. Louis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

St. Louis Mortgages