Sorry to have to FACT Check you:<quoted text>
You've got to be joking right? I have seen fuzzy math and skewed math before but this beyond screwed up. Even your fuzzy math is wrong. First of all a 4 trillion increase on 10 trillion is a 40% increase not 34%. Next is the fact that Reagan had two terms yet you are only counting one term for Obama. Granted this is only in the first year of his second term. Third is the fact that by your own post the debt was at 10 trillion when Obama took office and now stands at over 17 trillion. An increase of 70%, again not the 34% you falsely are trying to claim. Lastly you can't compare the actual amounts spent versus what the percentage is. It's a nice try to make the Democrats look like the less guilty of the two but it is wrong nevertheless. The bottom line is this...
220 years of Presidents = 10 trillion
Less then 5 years of Obama = 7 trillion
Obama had held the office of President 2.27% of the total time we have had a President yet he accounts for 58.8% of the total debt.
At the rate he is going he will create more debt than all the previous Presidents combined by the end of his reign of terror.
Get your facts straight Jack. Your fuzzy math is nothing but liberal horse manure.
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower?
Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?
Slowest Spending in Decades
Annualized growth of federal spending
Reagan 1992-1985 8.7%
Reagan 1986-1989 4.9%
Bush I 1990-1993 5.4%
CIinton 1994-1997 3.2%
CIinton 1998-2001 3.9%
Bush II 2002-2005 7.3%
Bush II 2006-2009 8.1%
Obama 2010-2013 1.4%
Sources: Forbes, Marketwatch
You don't like me...because I tell the truth...plus, I'm what you fear most...a patriot that is no longer afraid to stand up and fight you...and I give slam it back at you back better than you.
You should be afraid...of yourself!