“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#76996 Feb 20, 2013
Maxims predate the 17th Century. Anything of substance?
Norton

Independence, MO

#76997 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
You obfuscate for simple reasons—there are no verses supporting your claim of a 'tribulation', or for an 'eternal fire of damnation where sinners burn in perpetuity'.
So you 'strain at a gnat while swallowing a camel'. Your conflict is with yourself, not with those who contest your rather strict and nonsensical beliefs.
The King James version of the Bible is not 'protected by anyone', and certainly not protected by the divinity of God. You are speaking of the concepts put forth in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Torah. They are verbatim. The NT and the remainder of the Bible are not. They have been altered, manipulated, and boiled into nonexistence. It is a nice myth, however.
They selected the books, not by author, but by topic. Revelation was written by an outsider, but until that point, the Bible had no ending. So they need an ending, and Revelation was a nicely written construct of a Biblical Epilogue. You stopped following Christ and began following an often poorly written book.
Human beings screw up everything we touch, including the scriptures—and the concept of love, compassion, and the Christ.
You are the new version of the Pharisees, against whom Christ railed. How does it feel to misdirect souls? To reduce the spirits of so-called 'failed Christians' to the ashes of a nonexistent fire?
To spend eternity without the Father is the horror that Christ related, and he compared the absence of the 'soul' to spend all eternity—not in a burning everlasting hell-fire, but in all eternity without God—without a spirit or without a soul, without awareness, and without any further existence. Life ends after you lose your soul, your spirit, and you are no more.
He used the Fires of the Landfills around Jerusalem as an example of something that would be worse than spending eternity without an awareness, without a soul, without his Father.
And someone along the line turned that into Hell, and made it a place for all eternity. All Christ was attempting to do—by using a parable as he always did—was not to scare people needlessly with a place called Hell, but to scare them away from the proposition of never existing again, and to be without God for an eternity.
You do a great disservice to Christ. You place words into his mouth that were never even uttered. And you do so with the belief that you are doing his will. That is sad.
Blind Guides.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =27VbFALHsjgXX
Me thinks you are clear off your rocker!!!!!!!!!!
Are you for real or even of this planet? I never heard such nonsense!


CHEERS!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76998 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
A difference in opinion doesn't require fifty Christs, now go back to bastardizing philosophy. You have far too many weaknesses to stick them all in the religious portion of discussions. Just continue fooking up philosophical argument. It's cute.
Have you ever considered going to college?
I have gone to 5 colleges / universities. Have you recently considered taking remedial grammar and remedial logic? That might help get your thinking straightened out.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76999 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever considered submitting your posts to Penthouse Forum? Both have constant and impotent wanking, and nothing of any real substance—much like everything you post here.
One of the main reasons I post here is to take people like you, who consider themselves "intellectuals," and beat them down over time with my impeccable logical arguments. I get a certain perverse satisfaction in showing them up for what they are: clueless.
Norton

Independence, MO

#77001 Feb 20, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Norton you talk as if you are a Christian and know the bible but you don't even know who died on the cross for us. Read your bible some more, go to church some more them come back and talk to us.
I know who died on the Cross. Jesus Christ, the Son of God, second person of the Trinity.(Father, Son, Holy Spirit)

I know I should have said Jesus instead in the statement I made. Heaven forbid that I make a mistake.

CHEERS!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77002 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you're blind too? Feed the dog. Otherwise, you'll fall off the 'ends of the earth' where Old Yeller resides in his trailer.
I have indeed lived in what used to be called a "house trailer" for around 5 years. And have lived several months after retirement for over 14 years in one of two motorhomes. I rather enjoy traveling, and have done quite a bit.
Norton

Independence, MO

#77004 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
You obfuscate for simple reasons—there are no verses supporting your claim of a 'tribulation', or for an 'eternal fire of damnation where sinners burn in perpetuity'.
So you 'strain at a gnat while swallowing a camel'. Your conflict is with yourself, not with those who contest your rather strict and nonsensical beliefs.
The King James version of the Bible is not 'protected by anyone', and certainly not protected by the divinity of God. You are speaking of the concepts put forth in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Torah. They are verbatim. The NT and the remainder of the Bible are not. They have been altered, manipulated, and boiled into nonexistence. It is a nice myth, however.
They selected the books, not by author, but by topic. Revelation was written by an outsider, but until that point, the Bible had no ending. So they need an ending, and Revelation was a nicely written construct of a Biblical Epilogue. You stopped following Christ and began following an often poorly written book.
Human beings screw up everything we touch, including the scriptures—and the concept of love, compassion, and the Christ.
You are the new version of the Pharisees, against whom Christ railed. How does it feel to misdirect souls? To reduce the spirits of so-called 'failed Christians' to the ashes of a nonexistent fire?
To spend eternity without the Father is the horror that Christ related, and he compared the absence of the 'soul' to spend all eternity—not in a burning everlasting hell-fire, but in all eternity without God—without a spirit or without a soul, without awareness, and without any further existence. Life ends after you lose your soul, your spirit, and you are no more.
He used the Fires of the Landfills around Jerusalem as an example of something that would be worse than spending eternity without an awareness, without a soul, without his Father.
And someone along the line turned that into Hell, and made it a place for all eternity. All Christ was attempting to do—by using a parable as he always did—was not to scare people needlessly with a place called Hell, but to scare them away from the proposition of never existing again, and to be without God for an eternity.
You do a great disservice to Christ. You place words into his mouth that were never even uttered. And you do so with the belief that you are doing his will. That is sad.
Blind Guides.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =27VbFALHsjgXX
You are the one that is sad. You are clueless about the Bible, while pretending like you are a brilliant scholar of everything. The Bible speaks more of Hell than Heaven. You might want to actually read the Bible and see for yourself. You may even be worse than Dawg. What are you.....a New Ager that has crazy concepts of the Bible?

CHEERS!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77005 Feb 20, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You know Dawg, it never ceases to amaze me how much you can get a guy to type when you have kicked his ass.
Yeah. One possibility is that they are masochists, and enjoy getting beaten down.

Yet another possibility is they hope that, if they keep bloviating long enough, everyone will forget their prior inanities. I think that "TN" is the latter type. He reminds me somewhat of "Smifville," who did not have the courage or intellectual honesty to admit that he was always being kicked into outer space.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77006 Feb 20, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I believe you and your neighbors in Dumbshitville do refer to it as Pascal's Gamble and the most of the rest of the world call it Pascal's Wager.
Tell us O mystic Carnac, what are these "regional colloquialisms" you speak of. Some examples to your bs would be an excellent touch. Since it was developed in the 17th Century it not only predates your previous moniker (whatever that means) but pretty much your entire existence. It isn't a maxim as Dawg has pointed out.
ROFLMFAO that you have to go through this obvious BS to cover your stupidity. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
In but a few hours, you have accurately assessed the mental level of "TN." Sometimes he bloviates such a large smokescreen that it is a bit difficult to see through the haze of all his errors.

Speaking of Carnac, check out this 2-minute video for a bit of wisdom:

http://www.youtube.com/embed/F7pYHN9iC9I...

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77007 Feb 20, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Me thinks you are clear off your rocker!!!!!!!!!!
Are you for real or even of this planet? I never heard such nonsense!
CHEERS!
The difference between you and I is simple to discern. I can rip your entire premise of both 'hell' and 'the rapture and tribulation' apart, and you cannot defend it unless you're calling me 'off my rocker'. You have never studied the Theology of Christianity, Judaism, nor any other religious philosophy. The only effort you have made is to 'attend church'. That's akin to reading the Cliff Notes of Moby Dick and then professing your expertise in fishing.

You spend more time condemning people to hell—a nonexistent cliche'—and no time whatsoever in researching your own nonsense. Read of John Darby. I'll give you the fifteen years that will take. Until then, abuse others with your messianic complex, and latent-life Tomfoolery. I thought you bad promise. In fact, you're just another blowhard.

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

The sad thing is, you think that pertains to me. Yet, if there is indeed a hell, it will be your destination; and if there is indeed a Tribulation, you will remain on earth to ponder your own judgmental nonsense.

Lament the fact that churches are empty—you're an example of the reason. It has absolutely nothing to do with Satan. You need him as a Nemesis. Otherwise, you seem to have wasted your entire life—and you have.

Godspeed.

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77008 Feb 20, 2013
****Had promise

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77009 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>{To "DanFromSmithville": } Wrong, as usual.
"Pascal's Wager (also known as Pascal's Gamble) is an argument in apologetic philosophy which was devised by the seventeenth-century French philosopher ... "
See?
ROFL! Yes. We "see." NOW you are quoting from "classic" Wikipedia. I thought you "intellectuals" did not use Wikipedia? It appears that you are totally incapable of any original thought whatsoever.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal 's_Wager

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77010 Feb 20, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one that is sad. You are clueless about the Bible, while pretending like you are a brilliant scholar of everything. The Bible speaks more of Hell than Heaven. You might want to actually read the Bible and see for yourself. You may even be worse than Dawg. What are you.....a New Ager that has crazy concepts of the Bible?
CHEERS!
Prove it. I have the time to teach you the difference between nonsensical tripe and serious philosophical theory.

Prove it. Not just the NT—hell is not a place of 'fire and brimstone'. The entire premise of hell is based upon your belief that 'inferior people will suffer, and you will be given the keys to gate on a road paved with gold. That's a modern concept. So is socialism. Hell means 'to live forever in the absence of God'. It's really not that complex.

Your entire foundation of believe is based upon sand, and you wonder why your your faith is crumbling. And yes, it is. The older you become, the more you realize how poorly you have been taught, and how poorly you have tried to teach.

You blather. I deal with specificity. Keep blathering, and wallow in your own self-righteous indignation. It's all that you have. Not righteousness—self-righteousne ss. They're as different as your version of hell, and the real hell.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77011 Feb 20, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
I am beginning to thing TripleNegative was home schooled and all they used was Dr. Suess Books and Hooked on Phonics tapes,,,,, and he still didn't pass. lol
Ah, hahahahahahahahaha! SO true!

GAME POINT!

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77012 Feb 20, 2013
I only speak about the things that I know. I do not bother discussing things about which I am ignorant—tractor pulls, Nirvana in a case of beer, protesting with God's so-called wrath and fury, and bitching with half-witted bastardized philosophical diatribes.

God was not bitter, Nietzsche was not that brilliant, and Lennon was not that sane.

&#9786;

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77013 Feb 20, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
I know who died on the Cross. Jesus Christ, the Son of God, second person of the Trinity.(Father, Son, Holy Spirit)...
<.sigh!.> Sorry, "Norton," but once again I feel compelled to straighten you out. The Holy Spirit appeared to the Virgin Mary before Jesus was born.

Thus, Jesus is the third person of the Trinity, because the Holy Spirit pre-dated the existence of Jesus. Nowhere in your Bible does it say that Jesus Christ is the "second person of the Trinity."

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77014 Feb 20, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
In but a few hours, you have accurately assessed the mental level of "TN." Sometimes he bloviates such a large smokescreen that it is a bit difficult to see through the haze of all his errors.
Speaking of Carnac, check out this 2-minute video for a bit of wisdom:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/F7pYHN9iC9I...
The only thing worse than your illiterate diatribes of bad ad hominem, is your illiterate diatribes of bad ad hominem directed at someone to their back.

You're a simpleton, and 'dumbing down' sophistical, theosophical, or philosophical concepts is what you expect, much like you expect your news to be in Weekly Reader content. To you, Aristotle would be a moron, and Johnny Carson would be a philosophical genius.

Now go back to your Carnac nonsense. It's rather cute in its inherent idiocy. You remain a dullard. You cannot alter that by trolling for insult-material from your wanking-buddies.

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77015 Feb 20, 2013
****are

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77016 Feb 20, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text> ... "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." ...
Is that yet another one of your logical arguments? Sounds like a maxim to me.

“Triple — Negative”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77017 Feb 20, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
<.sigh!.> Sorry, "Norton," but once again I feel compelled to straighten you out. The Holy Spirit appeared to the Virgin Mary before Jesus was born.
Thus, Jesus is the third person of the Trinity, because the Holy Spirit pre-dated the existence of Jesus. Nowhere in your Bible does it say that Jesus Christ is the "second person of the Trinity."
Old Yeller: Correcting you is a full-time job, and to be taken both with a grain-of-salt sincerity, and an overdose of remedial nonsensical diuretics. Now clean yourself up and buy some Depends. Yellow stains are supposed to be limited to your dentures, and not saturating your Khakis as well.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... (Aug '14) 47 min Jupiter 5,913
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr Samuel-6g-Jackson 19,631
Divorced after 35 years 17 hr Divorced after 35... 1
Looking for A M B I E N/Z O L P I D E M Wed stlouisperson 2
Looking for F o c a l i n Wed TypeA4Sure 1
Baldwin/Ballwin Studio (May '08) Wed HIstorybuffinNe 2
Why are black people so angry and aggressive? (Aug '14) Wed james 19
St. Louis Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

St. Louis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:55 pm PST

Bleacher Report 4:55PM
Rams Would Waste Opportunity by Not Trading Bradford
Yahoo! Sports 5:36 PM
Falcons release veteran running back Steven Jackson
Bleacher Report 8:55 PM
St. Louis Rams: 5 Best Options to Replace Joe Barksdale This Offseason
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Why the Browns Need to Stay Far Away from Bradford
NFL 7:00 AM
Weinke makes a Luck-Bradford collegiate comparison