“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#76728 Feb 17, 2013
Annie W wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again Yellow Dawg Democrat the reason the budget has not been balanced is the Dems. will not go table with anything other than to raise taxes and the debt ceiling to pay for its uncontrollable spending. Republicans on other hand don't want to raise taxes. But instead cutout many of the programs that are duplicated. Cut the size of gov. Reduce spending. Close the loop holes. The republicans have brought several plans and proposals to the table. Democrats have not as yet laid out any plan or proposals.
Well, as a woman, what is your opinion regarding the Dem's big push on the Violence Against Women Act?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/opinion/ren...

As for budget cuts, get out your calculator if you need help.
At the end of the Bush fiscal year, September 30, 2009, the deficit was $1,417,121. Obama’s first fiscal year, September 30, 2010, the deficit was $1,294,090. THE DEFICIT WENT DOWN!
Obama’s second fiscal year September 30, 2011, the deficit was $1,298,614. Obama’s third fiscal year August 31, 2012 (latest available), the deficit was $1,164,373.
Gun Grabber Commies

Forsyth, MO

#76729 Feb 17, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
When did the US government take over the oil companies?
I suppose capitalism has failed. I thought you believed in it.
What do you expect from a President who names an energy secretary that thinks we should have higher gas prices "like those in Europe"?

We warned that Obama is pushing up gas and energy prices with his "green" socialist agenda. Obama railed at gas prices when Bush was president and it was headline stories as all Bush's fault. Now the Obama propaganda media ignores the even greater gas prices costing consumers a quarter trillion dollars.

Obama killed the American oil pipeline and most drilling for domestic oil. The threats from Iran are driving up the price of gasoline and oil. Thank an environmentalist wacko and Obama for $7 gas.

The Obama administration seems to be doing everything it can to raise the price of energy. This is slowing the economy, killing jobs, hurting the poor and the middle class and raising the cost of virtually everything.

Environmentalists don't want oil drilling and they don't care that this reduces supply and raises prices. In fact, they want prices to rise.

So we have a president who promised a plan that would 'skyrocket' electricity rates, an EPA that bases its illegal and tyrannical power grab on fraudulent data and suppressed any dissent, and an administration that is collectively working to ruin the oil, steel, coal, and cement industries. An administration that ignores the will of the people and its congress and seems to be doing all it can to destroy jobs and the economy while promising to make jobs and economic growth its first priority.

Just look at the ideologues Obama chooses as his advisers. His cabinets are pushing "environmental justice" as a scheme for redistributing wealth. His energy secretary Steven Chu is on the record as having said we need higher gas prices like those in Europe. Obama warned us during his 2008 campaign that "under my plan electricity rates will necessarily have to skyrocket." Obama hired an anti-commerce commerce secretary in John Bryson.

Senator Inhofe has called Obama's EPA a "growing menace to the economy." John P. Holdren, who then-President-elect Barack Obama nominated as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in December 2008, called just five months before his nomination for a global climate-change agreement that would allow wealth to be redistributed from countries in the global "North" to countries in the "South." Obama also picked a "spread the wealth" progressive lawyer for his top economist.

Are we going to believe what they SAY or what they DO?

http://www.youtube.com/embed/hfDGRJ1LtSQ
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76730 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Grabber Commies wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you expect from a President who names an energy secretary that thinks we should have higher gas prices "like those in Europe"?
We warned that Obama is pushing up gas and energy prices with his "green" socialist agenda. Obama railed at gas prices when Bush was president and it was headline stories as all Bush's fault. Now the Obama propaganda media ignores the even greater gas prices costing consumers a quarter trillion dollars.
Obama killed the American oil pipeline and most drilling for domestic oil. The threats from Iran are driving up the price of gasoline and oil. Thank an environmentalist wacko and Obama for $7 gas.
The Obama administration seems to be doing everything it can to raise the price of energy. This is slowing the economy, killing jobs, hurting the poor and the middle class and raising the cost of virtually everything.
Environmentalists don't want oil drilling and they don't care that this reduces supply and raises prices. In fact, they want prices to rise.
So we have a president who promised a plan that would 'skyrocket' electricity rates, an EPA that bases its illegal and tyrannical power grab on fraudulent data and suppressed any dissent, and an administration that is collectively working to ruin the oil, steel, coal, and cement industries. An administration that ignores the will of the people and its congress and seems to be doing all it can to destroy jobs and the economy while promising to make jobs and economic growth its first priority.
Just look at the ideologues Obama chooses as his advisers. His cabinets are pushing "environmental justice" as a scheme for redistributing wealth. His energy secretary Steven Chu is on the record as having said we need higher gas prices like those in Europe. Obama warned us during his 2008 campaign that "under my plan electricity rates will necessarily have to skyrocket." Obama hired an anti-commerce commerce secretary in John Bryson.
Senator Inhofe has called Obama's EPA a "growing menace to the economy." John P. Holdren, who then-President-elect Barack Obama nominated as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in December 2008, called just five months before his nomination for a global climate-change agreement that would allow wealth to be redistributed from countries in the global "North" to countries in the "South." Obama also picked a "spread the wealth" progressive lawyer for his top economist.
Are we going to believe what they SAY or what they DO?
http://www.youtube.com/embed/hfDGRJ1LtSQ
Obama has certainly done more than you have with your shitty life...unlike you he doesn't have to lie about what he's done and act BIG on Topix to compensate for all his failures ...like you do!
GOP an OCEAN of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76731 Feb 17, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, as a woman, what is your opinion regarding the Dem's big push on the Violence Against Women Act?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/opinion/ren...
As for budget cuts, get out your calculator if you need help.
At the end of the Bush fiscal year, September 30, 2009, the deficit was $1,417,121. Obama’s first fiscal year, September 30, 2010, the deficit was $1,294,090. THE DEFICIT WENT DOWN!
Obama’s second fiscal year September 30, 2011, the deficit was $1,298,614. Obama’s third fiscal year August 31, 2012 (latest available), the deficit was $1,164,373.
Agree...Excellent Post!
MuslimDicktator Obozo

Forsyth, MO

#76732 Feb 17, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, as a woman, what is your opinion regarding the Dem's big push on the Violence Against Women Act?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/opinion/ren...
As for budget cuts, get out your calculator if you need help.
At the end of the Bush fiscal year, September 30, 2009, the deficit was $1,417,121. Obama’s first fiscal year, September 30, 2010, the deficit was $1,294,090. THE DEFICIT WENT DOWN!
Obama’s second fiscal year September 30, 2011, the deficit was $1,298,614. Obama’s third fiscal year August 31, 2012 (latest available), the deficit was $1,164,373.
OBAMA PROMISED TO CUT DEFICIT IN HALF BY 2012!
Remember when President Obama promised he'd cut the deficit in half in his first term? Well, the results are in, and red ink will once again top $1 trillion. Calling this an epic failure isn't enough.

In his first budget message to the country, Obama promised to make the "tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline, cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office, and put our nation on sound fiscal footing." His plan projected a deficit of $557 billion this year, and $512 billion next year.

On Wednesday, the Congressional Budget Office showed how far Obama has missed that target. It reported that the deficit will top $1.1 trillion this year, and assuming Congress keeps most of the Bush tax cuts in place (which Obama wants), the deficit will be close to, if not more than,$1 trillion next year.

It gets even worse when you look at the deficit as a share of the economy. Obama's first budget promised the deficit would account for just 3.4% of GDP by 2012. Actual result: 7.3%. He said the deficit next year would be just 2.9% of GDP. Now the CBO figures it will be more like 6%.

Obama blames everyone but himself for his failures. And sure enough, he's been claiming that most of the nation's current deficit problems are the fault of President Bush's tax cuts, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the new Medicare drug benefit.

"We ran two wars on a credit card. We went from surplus to deficit," he bemoaned at a recent campaign event. "So when I walked into office we already had a $1 trillion deficit." The truth is, Obama has only himself to blame for the country's fiscal quagmire.

First, the economy has vastly underperformed its potential, thanks to growth-suffocating regulations, misguided industrial policy, the looming threat of Obama-Care and the constant push to raise taxes in the most productive parts of the economy.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/Q3ddgXOHPxk
R U Kiddingme

United States

#76733 Feb 17, 2013
Does anyone know how to remove a poster so that you don't even have to see their idiotic posts?(Muslim guy from West Plains)
Sussie

United States

#76734 Feb 17, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, as a woman, what is your opinion regarding the Dem's big push on the Violence Against Women Act?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/opinion/ren...
As for budget cuts, get out your calculator if you need help.
At the end of the Bush fiscal year, September 30, 2009, the deficit was $1,417,121. Obama’s first fiscal year, September 30, 2010, the deficit was $1,294,090. THE DEFICIT WENT DOWN!
Obama’s second fiscal year September 30, 2011, the deficit was $1,298,614. Obama’s third fiscal year August 31, 2012 (latest available), the deficit was $1,164,373.
Thank you for being a voice of reason on this forum!
First Amendment

Forsyth, MO

#76736 Feb 17, 2013
R U Kiddingme wrote:
Does anyone know how to remove a poster so that you don't even have to see their idiotic posts?(Muslim guy from West Plains)
Ya, contact your dear leader. He's America's first Dictator!

Since: Feb 13

Farmington, MO

#76737 Feb 17, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, as a woman, what is your opinion regarding the Dem's big push on the Violence Against Women Act?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/opinion/ren...
As for budget cuts, get out your calculator if you need help.
At the end of the Bush fiscal year, September 30, 2009, the deficit was $1,417,121. Obama’s first fiscal year, September 30, 2010, the deficit was $1,294,090. THE DEFICIT WENT DOWN!
Obama’s second fiscal year September 30, 2011, the deficit was $1,298,614. Obama’s third fiscal year August 31, 2012 (latest available), the deficit was $1,164,373.
My goodness you are an idiot. No wonder this country is in trouble. First of all I am not from the lead belt that is an IP address this site gave me not where I am actually from. Secondly,
I don't know whose @$$ you crawled up to pull those numbers out but they are wrong or what country you live in but it sure hasn't been the good old USA. I think if you are going to argue politics maybe you need to know the actual data and facts to back up your arguement not randomly thought up fictional data. Now why don't you crawl back under your rock until you can actually discuss fact and data accurately. But first you might want to get help for your pychosis and dilusions.

Since: Feb 13

Farmington, MO

#76738 Feb 17, 2013
Now that I figured out you are a bunch of idiots that do not know the issues to even have a civil dicussion I am out of here.
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#76739 Feb 17, 2013
Annie W wrote:
Let's see and what have the Dems. done for our country lately. We have Obama Care that imposes hidden taxes on the American people which was rammed down our throats. They spent tax dollars on Solendra and other alternative energy companies that have all went bankrupt. They are now trying to take away our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. They are trying to regulate what kind of foods we can eat. They want to raise taxes. They gave themselves raises and then turned around and distributed out free phones to those on gov. assistance all from taxpayer money. This country has over 49 million people on some form of gov. assistance and it is rising everyday. There is less than that paying in taxes. How long do you think it is going to take before America goes bankrupt and nobody will get any assistance even those that have earn the right to recieve it. Then what state will this country be in. How are the people that have been recieving assistance going to react. I'll tell you. They will be the first to attack the gov. and dems. for making them dependent in the first place. At which time the dems. are going to want to have their second amendment right to protect themselves from the mass ugliness and choas they themselves created. Now if we do not raise the debt ceiling. Increase taxes across the board minamally. Close all tax loopholes within the system. Stop the free give aways. Such as phones. Get rid of Obama Care. Put restrictions on who can recieve welfare put them on a time limit in which they will not recieve assistance. Only give entitlements to those that have worked and paid into them. Cut gov. wages and benefits down to what the average taxpayer recieves. Quit stimulating the economy by printing more money and flooding the market with it. Raise intrest rates so the dollar grows in value. Then and only then will we have a chance of not going bankrupt. I hope the repulicans stick to what they've promised. Otherwise we will not succeed in a balanced budget.
Maybe you should run for an office or President! Give it some thot'! We need to get rid of the people making these terrible decision in D. C. before they ruin our country.

CHEERS!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76740 Feb 17, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not going to hell—you will be condemned to the Dahmer-Bundy Memorial Suite, and you'll sit right next to the Boston Strangler and the Green River Killer. No need to bring snacks—you're 'them', you lunatic. Put mushrooms on your ears, onions on your microscopic penis, and wear bells on your twinkle-toes. Give Ted Kennedy my best. He will be with the Chappaquiddick Party of 12.
Seriously, have you ever considered writing twaddle for the Republican National Committee? They need a writer of your caliber, meaning .01 ... Heh!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76741 Feb 17, 2013
General Sherman wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems your getting you a@@ kicked worse than your Confederate TRAITOR heros!
I love the smell of burnig Red State Trailer Homes in the morning
Don't be so critical of "TN." He fancies himself to be an "intellectual," and will probably cry if you continue. Don't be cruel -- to an ignorant fool.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76742 Feb 17, 2013
Dynamite wrote:
What a waste of time this was; seeing queer finders fight for some form of metaphorical trophy. For all humanity, find something else that persuades your time.
Who manages this forum? Such a person would have to be as challenged as the aforementioned.
The only person more challenged would be someone who just drops by to post additional inanities -- like yourself!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76743 Feb 17, 2013
General Sherman wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Your Nortons Mother...
Hello...do you know where your son Norton is?
since he's always yelling "the sky is falling" Hopefully that rock that fell out of space yesterday ...landed on him?
so quiet now ...lovely really!
I fear "Norton" has been "Raptured," or "ruptured" -- not necessarily in that order.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76744 Feb 17, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Not witty nor sane. Care to try again, or is this your final impotent answer? You're dumber than Old Yeller, and that was considered to be improbable, if not downright impossible.
You're ordinary and childish. Deal within those limitations.
Filled with your "delusions of grandeur," you consider yourself "important." I think you really meant "impotent."

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76745 Feb 17, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text> ... Have you considered using Old Yeller's source? Rent-A-Dullard?...
I would not recommend that. I rented YOU from "Rent-A-Dullard," and you could not rise to their low standards.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#76746 Feb 17, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you considered writing your juvenile diatribes for Beavis and Butthead Does San Francisco? You might get witty by accident, eventually Old Yeller, yet if I were you, I would not hold my breath unless you look fetching in blue.
I have never watched "Beavis and Butthead," but I am sure you enjoy them all the time, because they remind you of your siblings (or "significant other).
GOP an OCEAN of sTUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76747 Feb 17, 2013
Annie W wrote:
<quoted text>
My goodness you are an idiot. No wonder this country is in trouble. First of all I am not from the lead belt that is an IP address this site gave me not where I am actually from. Secondly,
I don't know whose @$$ you crawled up to pull those numbers out but they are wrong or what country you live in but it sure hasn't been the good old USA. I think if you are going to argue politics maybe you need to know the actual data and facts to back up your arguement not randomly thought up fictional data. Now why don't you crawl back under your rock until you can actually discuss fact and data accurately. But first you might want to get help for your pychosis and dilusions.
You're the one with LEAD in your drinking water...looks like it's made you STUPID.

Now your the perfect Republican

CHEERS
GOP an OCEAN of sTUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#76748 Feb 17, 2013
Annie W wrote:
Now that I figured out you are a bunch of idiots that do not know the issues to even have a civil dicussion I am out of here.
Don't let Nortons nose hity ou in the a@@ on the way out CHEERS

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... 9 min guest 4,723
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr tcaud 19,486
any girls into tribbing/scissoring? (May '10) 7 hr Crystal 74
Reaction to the Ferguson Grand Jury's Decision 7 hr BoBoo 52
Why are black people so angry and aggressive? 8 hr blkisbeauty 9
Advice for AFRICANS 12 hr right is right 4
Wilson Will Be In The News Again 12 hr right is right 2
St. Louis Dating
Find my Match

St. Louis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

St. Louis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in St. Louis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:15 am PST

NBC Sports11:15AM
Weekend Preview: Can Chiefs bounce back in Week 13?
Bleacher Report 3:17 PM
Murray's Hype Makes Him Bad Fantasy Option
NBC Sports 3:58 PM
Rams defense expects Chris Long back this week - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:04 PM
Chris Long appears likely to return for Rams this week
Bleacher Report 9:49 PM
Breaking Down Denver's Game Plan vs. KC