Norton

Overland Park, KS

#72757 Dec 11, 2012
IToldYouSo wrote:
<quoted text>
So what if he / she is a troll? Get them banned, Fu-ck-em! Someone saying stuff that I disagree with doesn't bother me. I'm certainly always up for someone stating things so stupid i cant help but laugh at.
Whomever that Norton person is by far has more ridiculous nonsense being captured for years worth of laughs. The totally misguided or deliberate comments from that person in particular are better than most things a 4 year old says about the Easter Bunny, Sponge Bob Sqaure Pants or Pee Wee Herman! Don't ban them, TURN IT UP!
So, you think my thoughts are funny, huh? Well they say a good laugh is good for the soul.

However, most things I say I believe to be true. I can't help people that are ignorant and have no desire to know the truth.

Liberals have a whole different way of thinking than I do about politics.

Some people just sound plain dumb to me!!!!!
CHEERS!
Norton

Overland Park, KS

#72758 Dec 11, 2012
Bible Babln BS Artists wrote:
<quoted text>
Jerusalem in the days of Abraham was called Salem...and it was ruled by Melkezidek ...he is mentioned again in the book of Hebrews ...you'd know that IF YOU EVER REALLY DID READ THE BIBLE...
Jerusalem was occuppied by the Jebusites...and NEVER conquered by Joshua because of the connection with Abraham and Melkizadek...There were two bronze plaques over the gates that reminded EVERYONE of this....Jerusalem stayed Jebusite until David snuck in through the sewers and took it... YOU WOULD HAVE TO READ THE BIBLE TO KNOW THAT...later the temple was built on the Threshing floor of Anarith (A HITTITE)...who was a JEBUSITE and they bought the land from him. Uriah "the Hittite" and Bathseba Davids downfall where JEBUSITES...the famous ZADOKS that became the family of High Priests ...appear at this time...and they are believed to have been JEBUSITES since that is a shorted version of of the name Melki-ZADOK.
Before you start making a fool of yourself ...maybe you should read the Bible...you think?
You are nothing but a Pharasee!
God Bless
CHEERS
Never heard of "Melkezidek", but I have heard of Melchizedek!:))))

CHEERS!
Norton

Overland Park, KS

#72759 Dec 11, 2012
Truth Hurts wrote:
Norton,
Faith is a wonderful thing, until someone tries to push thier ideology on another. Then it crosses a line.
Someone seeking faith is another story, but random preaching and attempted conversion annoys the crap out of people. You might try preaching at church, thats where it's been done since the founding of this country.
Frankly I don't care if you believe dog turds are a sign of life on mars. One of the wonderful things about america, religious freedom.
Well, we know how you stand on faith! If conversion annoys people, then I guess that would be a sign that they have never been saved. Yes, Christianity is a great thing. I hate the word religion.

CHEERS!
Norton

Overland Park, KS

#72760 Dec 11, 2012
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I can recognize a troll when I see one. I find it amusing to actually "toy" with him, to see how ridiculous he can become. It amuses me.
How well I know you like to show your ignorance and try to make people think you are so brilliant.......you also like to copy and paste!:))))))

CHEERS!
Norton

Overland Park, KS

#72761 Dec 11, 2012
Jerusalem is NOT Jewish wrote:
According to the Hebrew Bible, the Jebusites (Hebrew: &#1497;&#1456;&#14 89;&#1493;&#1468;& #1505;&#1460;&#1497;, Modern Yevusi Tiberian Y&#601;&#7687;ūsī ISO 259-3 Ybusi) were a Canaanite tribe who inhabited and built Jerusalem prior to its conquest by King David according to the Biblical account; the Books of Kings state that Jerusalem was known as Jebus prior to this event. According to some Biblical chronologies, the city was conquered by King David in 1003 BC,[1] or according to other sources 869 BC.[2]
Ethnic origin
The Tanakh portion of the Bible contains the only surviving ancient text known to use the term Jebusite to describe the pre-Israelite inhabitants of Jerusalem; according to the Table of Nations at Genesis 10, the Jebusites are identified as a Canaanite tribe, which is listed in third place among the Canaanite groups, between the Biblical Hittites and the Amorites. Prior to modern archaeological studies, most Biblical scholars held the opinion that the Jebusites were identical to the Hittites, which continues to be the case, though less so.[3] However, an increasingly popular view, first put forward by Edward Lipinski, professor of Oriental and Slavonic studies at the Catholic University of Leuven, is that the Jebusites were most likely an Amorite tribe; Lipinski identified them with the group referred to as Yabusi'um in a cuneiform letter found in the archive of Mari, Syria.[4]
As Lipinski noted, however, it is entirely possible that more than one clan or tribe bore similar names, and thus that the Jebusites and Yabusi'um may have been separate people altogether.[4] In the Amarna letters, mention is made of the contemporaneous king of Jerusalem was named Abdi-Heba, which is a theophoric name invoking a Hurrian goddess named Hebat; unless a different ethnic group occupied Jerusalem in this period, this implies that the Jebusites were Hurrians themselves, were heavily influenced by Hurrian culture, or were dominated by a Hurrian maryannu class.
Jebusites named in the Bible
Melchizedek
According to Genesis, the ruler of Jerusalem in the time of Abraham was Melchizedek (also Melchizedeq), and that as well as being a ruler, he was also a priest. Rashi points out that Melchizedeq was another name for Shem, son of Noah. Later, Joshua is described as defeating a Jebusite king named Adonizedek. The first parts of their names mean king and lord, respectively, but though the zedek part can be translated as righteous (making the names my king is righteous and my lord is righteous), most Biblical scholars believe that it is a reference to a deity named Zedek, who was the main deity worshipped by the Jebusites (making the names my king is Zedek and my lord is Zedek).[5] Scholars are uncertain, however, whether Melchizedek was himself intended in the Genesis account to be understood as a Jebusite, rather than a member of another group in charge of Jerusalem prior to the Jebusites - Jerusalem is referred to as Salem rather than Jebus in the passages of Genesis describing Melchizedek.[6]
Araunah
Another Jebusite, Araunah (referred to as Ornan by the Book of Chronicles) is described by the Books of Samuel as having sold his threshing floor to King David, which David then constructed an altar on, the implication being that the altar became the core of the Temple of Solomon. Araunah means the lord in Hittite, and so most scholars, since they consider the Jebusites to have been Hittite, have argued that Araunah may have been another king of Jerusalem;[7] some scholars additionally believe that Adonijah is actually a disguised reference to Araunah, the &#1512; (r) having been corrupted to &#1491; (d).[8] The narrative itself is considered by some scholars to be aetiological and of dubious historicity;[5] Melchizedek, as a priest as well as king, was likely to have been associated with a sanctuary, probably dedicated to Zedek, and scholars su
copy and paste........copy and paste, etc.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#72762 Dec 11, 2012
Trurh Hurts wrote:
<quoted text>
Rutan used thier data, charts and graphs not his. Then applied them in a true statistical analysis with no bias.
I believe in the global teperature rise, just not the human c02 impact. The data doesn't support it, my opinion.
I don't agree that this is entirely the result of data from other climate sciences. As I said, the chart comparing our temperature to the Medeival Warming Period is incorrect. The mean temperature at that time was lower than the current mean. It is clearly evidence that he is intentionally cooking the results to favor his view. A detail like that isn't accidentally missed in a thurough review of the subject. I remain unconvinced and Rutan's presentation has done nothing to change that.

I do appreciate you providing it though. It is very interesting. Rutan is wrong about science in a big way. Whether intentional or through ignorance, I cannot say, but even he has a lot to learn.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#72763 Dec 11, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
copy and paste........copy and paste, etc.
Want a cracker?

Since: Feb 11

Columbia, MO

#72764 Dec 11, 2012
are Norton and SPC the same person?

I get this vibe on both:

http://static1.firedoglake.com/29/files/2012/...

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72765 Dec 11, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Scoffer! He did not say he would come back in their lifetime. They THOUGHT HE WOULD! God's timetable is different than ours.
Read 'EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT'!
CHEERS!
In the bible, he told them it would be in their lifetime. Get to know your own stupid book.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72766 Dec 11, 2012
1Watt Hermit wrote:
are Norton and SPC the same person?
I get this vibe on both:
http://static1.firedoglake.com/29/files/2012/...
Verdamt!

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72767 Dec 11, 2012
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
<.snicker!.>
Oh mercy, he is such a putz;0)

**snorts**

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72768 Dec 11, 2012
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What were satans words when he offered the world to satan again? I don't read that bit much.
Ah, the truth begins to come out. You don't read the bible and you probably don't own one or it would be right at hand. Just another 'cafeterian christian.'

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72769 Dec 11, 2012
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I must point out that it takes a certain amount of "faith" to believe that the entire universe was formed from a certain "singularity" which magically came into existence. Similarly: POOF!
lol!

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#72770 Dec 11, 2012
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, my judgment has been in error lots of times. And I have broken "man's laws" many times. But, like you, I have never sinned.
Religion is useful for many reasons: comfort, psychological well-being, explanation of the inexplicable, social contact, moral teaching. But I do not miss the "restrictions" of the Bible. Nor do I miss the moral judgments made by the clueless adherents to their particular brand of religion.
Yes, religion does promote (mostly NT) love and compassionate behavior and all good things.

I remember when I was still teaching a Sunday School Class, the lesson plan was about the sins of people who called themselves "Humanists" and explained in great detail how their actions, not being through Christ, were wothless and pitiable. Yes, you guessed it. Hades for them.

Had I ever taught about the sins of pedophiles, rapists,etc. I would probably been thrown out of the church. Good grief, the Bible has enough sex, adultery, rape, drunkeness in it to make a soap opera!

*sighs*
Nortons Bible is FOX NEWS

Saint Charles, MO

#72771 Dec 12, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
copy and paste........copy and paste, etc.
Bulls--t and ingnorance....Bulls--it and ingnorance, etc.
Nortons Bible is FOX NEWS

Saint Charles, MO

#72772 Dec 12, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Never heard of "Melkezidek", but I have heard of Melchizedek!:))))
CHEERS!
or Melkezidok...either I guess...

maybe someday YOU SOULD READ THE BIBLE instead of believing that FOX NEWS is scripture!

CHEERS!
DEM 5th Column isFOX NEWS

Saint Charles, MO

#72773 Dec 12, 2012
1Watt Hermit wrote:
are Norton and SPC the same person?
I get this vibe on both:
http://static1.firedoglake.com/29/files/2012/...
Both weird religious NUTS...but SPCa was alot stupider!

Since the election SPCa just disapeared like most of the trolls...

Now just Norton is left...babl'n his SATANIC craziness across the inbred meth addicted rural Republican parts of this state.

FOX NEWS helping DEMOCRATS WIN ELECTION

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#72774 Dec 12, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text> ...
However, most things I say I believe to be true....
WHOA! "Norton" finally admits the truth!

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#72775 Dec 12, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Never heard of "Melkezidek", but I have heard of Melchizedek!:))))...
You took that out of context.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#72776 Dec 12, 2012
Norton wrote:
<quoted text> ... Yes, Christianity is a great thing. I hate the word religion....
Would you prefer the word "cult"?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
For some, location of Brown's hands irrelevant 1 hr Buzz Lightyear 12
Ferguson shooting: Myths vs. facts 2 hr Yes lts Me 5
Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... 4 hr Obama is Half White 4,811
Gov Jay Nixon 5 hr Herman Bishop 1
Why are black people so angry and aggressive? 8 hr Ks jones 13
should browns stepdfather be charged with incit... 8 hr Former Local 5
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 8 hr bubba ali mohamad 19,489
St. Louis Dating
Find my Match

St. Louis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

St. Louis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in St. Louis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:56 pm PST

Bleacher Report 9:56PM
Full Broncos Preview for Chiefs Game
Bleacher Report11:09 PM
Full Rams Preview for Raiders Game
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Broncos vs. Chiefs: TV Info, Spread, Injury Updates, Game Time and More
Bleacher Report 4:18 AM
Full Chiefs Preview for Broncos Game
Bleacher Report 5:28 AM
Denver Broncos vs. Kansas City Chiefs Betting Odds, Analysis and NFL Pick